Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Risk and Protective Factors of Dementia in the U.S.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2025.2534651
Nasim B Ferdows, María P Aranda
{"title":"Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Risk and Protective Factors of Dementia in the U.S.","authors":"Nasim B Ferdows, María P Aranda","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2534651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates racial/ethnic disparities in dementia risk and protective factors using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 3,495 individuals aged 65+ from the 2016 HCAP linked to the HRS was conducted. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Risk factors included midlife cardiovascular conditions, hearing loss, current smoking, depression, and physical inactivity. Protective factors were education and wealth. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method was used to quantify the contribution of these factors in explaining racial/ethnic disparities in cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black participants had 2.883 times higher odds of developing dementia compared to Whites, while Hispanic participants had 1.230 times higher odds (not statistically significant). Mid- and late-life risk and protective factors explained 32% of the cognitive gap between Black and White participants, and 70% between Hispanic and White participants, leaving 68% and 30% unexplained, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing disparities in education, wealth, cardiovascular risks, depression, and hearing loss can reduce cognitive dysfunction in older adults.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Clinicians should target modifiable risk factors like depression and physical inactivity, particularly in minority populations. Addressing socioeconomic disparities is also crucial for improving cognitive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1186-1199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2534651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates racial/ethnic disparities in dementia risk and protective factors using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 3,495 individuals aged 65+ from the 2016 HCAP linked to the HRS was conducted. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Risk factors included midlife cardiovascular conditions, hearing loss, current smoking, depression, and physical inactivity. Protective factors were education and wealth. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method was used to quantify the contribution of these factors in explaining racial/ethnic disparities in cognitive functioning.

Results: Black participants had 2.883 times higher odds of developing dementia compared to Whites, while Hispanic participants had 1.230 times higher odds (not statistically significant). Mid- and late-life risk and protective factors explained 32% of the cognitive gap between Black and White participants, and 70% between Hispanic and White participants, leaving 68% and 30% unexplained, respectively.

Conclusions: Addressing disparities in education, wealth, cardiovascular risks, depression, and hearing loss can reduce cognitive dysfunction in older adults.

Clinical implications: Clinicians should target modifiable risk factors like depression and physical inactivity, particularly in minority populations. Addressing socioeconomic disparities is also crucial for improving cognitive health.

分解美国痴呆症风险和保护因素的种族和民族差异
目的:本研究利用健康与退休研究(HRS)和统一认知评估协议(HCAP)的数据调查痴呆风险和保护因素的种族/民族差异。方法:回顾性分析2016年HCAP与HRS相关的3495名65岁以上的个体。认知状态采用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评分进行评估。危险因素包括中年心血管疾病、听力损失、当前吸烟、抑郁和缺乏体育锻炼。保护因素是教育和财富。使用瓦哈卡-布林德分解方法来量化这些因素在解释种族/民族认知功能差异方面的贡献。结果:黑人参与者患痴呆症的几率是白人的2.883倍,而西班牙裔参与者患痴呆症的几率是白人的1.230倍(无统计学意义)。中年和晚年的风险和保护因素解释了黑人和白人参与者之间32%的认知差异,西班牙裔和白人参与者之间70%的认知差异,剩下的68%和30%分别无法解释。结论:解决教育、财富、心血管风险、抑郁和听力损失方面的差异可以减少老年人的认知功能障碍。临床意义:临床医生应该针对可改变的风险因素,如抑郁症和缺乏运动,特别是在少数民族人群中。解决社会经济差异对改善认知健康也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信