Repeatability of color measurements in multi-shade and single-shade resin composites of different thicknesses at different times: spectrophotometer versus mobile phone color applications.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
İbrahim Elgin Olgar, Özhan Yağcı, Muhammet Fidan
{"title":"Repeatability of color measurements in multi-shade and single-shade resin composites of different thicknesses at different times: spectrophotometer versus mobile phone color applications.","authors":"İbrahim Elgin Olgar, Özhan Yağcı, Muhammet Fidan","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06577-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term repeatability of a spectrophotometer and three mobile phone color applications (MCAs) on the iPhone Operating System (iOS) platform for color differences of single-shade and multi-shade resin materials of different thicknesses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A spectrophotometer (Vita Easy Shade V) was used as a reference instrument. Three MCAs were used: ColorMeter RGB, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, and Color Info Cam. Color measurements were performed on 1-mm and 2-mm thick specimens of resin composites: Charisma Smart (CS) / A1-A2-A3; Charisma Diamond One (C); Opallis (OP) / E1-E2-E3; Vittra APS Unique (V); Estelite Sigma Quick (ES) / A1-A2-A3; and Omnichroma (O) (n = 8). The specimens were measured at three time periods: Day 0 (t<sub>0</sub>), Day 1 (t<sub>1</sub>), and Day 7 (t<sub>2</sub>). The color differences were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula, with the corresponding color difference (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM<sub>00</sub>). Robust analysis of variation (Robust ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resin composites' main effects were statistically significant for MCDM<sub>00</sub> (p < 0.001). The highest MCDM<sub>00</sub> was observed in the OP-A3 composite (2.39 ± 0.18). Method effects were also significant (p = 0.001), with the Color Analyzer showing the highest MCDM<sub>00</sub> (2.02 ± 0.08) and the spectrophotometer showing the lowest MCDM<sub>00</sub> (0.40 ± 0.02). The highest MCDM<sub>00</sub> was found in the OP-A3 × 2 mm × Color Analyzer combination (4.18 ± 0.38). At t<sub>0</sub> - t<sub>1</sub>, the highest ΔE<sub>00</sub> was observed in the Vittra APS Unique composite (1.43 ± 0.10). At t<sub>0</sub> - t<sub>2</sub> and t<sub>1</sub> - t<sub>2</sub>, the highest ΔE<sub>00</sub> values were found in OP-A3 (2.97 ± 0.22 and 3.37 ± 0.24, respectively). The highest ΔE<sub>00</sub> was observed in the OP-A3 × 2 mm × Color Analyzer combination at t<sub>0</sub>-t<sub>2</sub> (5.29 ± 0.53) and t<sub>1</sub> - t<sub>2</sub> (5.57 ± 0.57) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spectrophotometer showed the highest repeatability over the times tested. The ColorMeter showed the highest repeatability among MCAs. The mobile phone color apps provided accessible and cost-effective color measurements, although their accuracy was inferior to that of spectrophotometers.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06577-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term repeatability of a spectrophotometer and three mobile phone color applications (MCAs) on the iPhone Operating System (iOS) platform for color differences of single-shade and multi-shade resin materials of different thicknesses.

Materials and methods: A spectrophotometer (Vita Easy Shade V) was used as a reference instrument. Three MCAs were used: ColorMeter RGB, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, and Color Info Cam. Color measurements were performed on 1-mm and 2-mm thick specimens of resin composites: Charisma Smart (CS) / A1-A2-A3; Charisma Diamond One (C); Opallis (OP) / E1-E2-E3; Vittra APS Unique (V); Estelite Sigma Quick (ES) / A1-A2-A3; and Omnichroma (O) (n = 8). The specimens were measured at three time periods: Day 0 (t0), Day 1 (t1), and Day 7 (t2). The color differences were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula, with the corresponding color difference (ΔE00) and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM00). Robust analysis of variation (Robust ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Results: The resin composites' main effects were statistically significant for MCDM00 (p < 0.001). The highest MCDM00 was observed in the OP-A3 composite (2.39 ± 0.18). Method effects were also significant (p = 0.001), with the Color Analyzer showing the highest MCDM00 (2.02 ± 0.08) and the spectrophotometer showing the lowest MCDM00 (0.40 ± 0.02). The highest MCDM00 was found in the OP-A3 × 2 mm × Color Analyzer combination (4.18 ± 0.38). At t0 - t1, the highest ΔE00 was observed in the Vittra APS Unique composite (1.43 ± 0.10). At t0 - t2 and t1 - t2, the highest ΔE00 values were found in OP-A3 (2.97 ± 0.22 and 3.37 ± 0.24, respectively). The highest ΔE00 was observed in the OP-A3 × 2 mm × Color Analyzer combination at t0-t2 (5.29 ± 0.53) and t1 - t2 (5.57 ± 0.57) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The spectrophotometer showed the highest repeatability over the times tested. The ColorMeter showed the highest repeatability among MCAs. The mobile phone color apps provided accessible and cost-effective color measurements, although their accuracy was inferior to that of spectrophotometers.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

不同厚度的多色和单色树脂复合材料在不同时间颜色测量的重复性:分光光度计与手机颜色应用。
目的:研究在iPhone操作系统(iOS)平台上,利用分光光度计和三种手机显色软件(MCAs)对不同厚度的单色和多色树脂材料色差的短期和长期重复性。材料和方法:以分光光度计(Vita Easy Shade V)作为参比仪器。使用了三个MCAs: ColorMeter RGB, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe和Color Info Cam。对1 mm和2 mm厚的树脂复合材料试样进行颜色测量:Charisma Smart (CS) / A1-A2-A3;魅力钻石一号(C);Opallis (OP) / E1-E2-E3;Vittra APS Unique (V);Estelite Sigma Quick (ES) / A1-A2-A3;全彩色(O) (n = 8)。在三个时间段测量标本:第0天(t0)、第1天(t1)和第7天(t2)。色差分析采用CIEDE2000公式,对应色差(ΔE00)和均值与均值色差(MCDM00)。采用稳健方差分析(Robust ANOVA)进行统计学分析(p)结果:树脂复合材料对MCDM00的主效应具有统计学意义(OP-A3复合材料的p为00(2.39±0.18))。方法效应也显著(p = 0.001),其中颜色分析仪的MCDM00最高(2.02±0.08),分光光度计的MCDM00最低(0.40±0.02)。OP-A3 × 2mm ×颜色分析仪组合的MCDM00最高(4.18±0.38)。在t0 - t1时,Vittra APS Unique复合物的ΔE00最高(1.43±0.10)。在t0 - t2和t1 - t2时,OP-A3的ΔE00值最高,分别为2.97±0.22和3.37±0.24。OP-A3 × 2mm ×颜色分析仪组合在t1 -t2(5.29±0.53)和t1 -t2(5.57±0.57)时的准确度最高ΔE00 (p)。色度计在mca中重复性最高。手机颜色应用程序提供了方便和经济有效的颜色测量,尽管它们的精度不如分光光度计。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信