Effectiveness and safety of a hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with molding process for cataract surgery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Liang-Ping Liu, Ying-Yan Qin, Qiang Lu, Qiang Wu, Guang-Ying Zheng, Yi-Yong Qian, Ying-Zi Pan, Zhe-Ming Wu, Jie-Wei Liu, Hong-Pei Ji, Xu-Dong Huang, Ming-Xing Wu
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of a hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with molding process for cataract surgery.","authors":"Liang-Ping Liu, Ying-Yan Qin, Qiang Lu, Qiang Wu, Guang-Ying Zheng, Yi-Yong Qian, Ying-Zi Pan, Zhe-Ming Wu, Jie-Wei Liu, Hong-Pei Ji, Xu-Dong Huang, Ming-Xing Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04232-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical study, conducted at nine sites in P.R. China. Eligible participants were adults aged 60-80 years with a diagnosis of age-related cataract scheduled for phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the aspheric monofocal IOL (SM60AS, Henan Simedice Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) or the control IOL (SN60WF Alcon Laboratories Inc.). Postoperative outcomes including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive status, and complications were assessed and compared between the two groups at each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients completed the study, including 88 in the SM60AS group and 85 in the SN60WF group. No statistically significant differences were found in CDVA between the two groups at any postoperative visit. Although the SM60AS group showed slightly lower UDVA at day 1, day 7 (p < 0.01) and 12 months (p < 0.05), there were no statistically significant differences in UDVA between the groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The SM60AS group exhibited a slightly more myopic refractive outcome compared to the control group, while residual astigmatism remained comparable. No serious IOL-related complications were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel SM60AS IOL demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness and safety, with clinical outcomes comparable to those of the established control IOL in cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was officially registered on August 29, 2020, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, with the registration number: ChiCTR2000037527 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=60164 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04232-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract surgery.

Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical study, conducted at nine sites in P.R. China. Eligible participants were adults aged 60-80 years with a diagnosis of age-related cataract scheduled for phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the aspheric monofocal IOL (SM60AS, Henan Simedice Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) or the control IOL (SN60WF Alcon Laboratories Inc.). Postoperative outcomes including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive status, and complications were assessed and compared between the two groups at each follow-up visit.

Results: A total of 173 patients completed the study, including 88 in the SM60AS group and 85 in the SN60WF group. No statistically significant differences were found in CDVA between the two groups at any postoperative visit. Although the SM60AS group showed slightly lower UDVA at day 1, day 7 (p < 0.01) and 12 months (p < 0.05), there were no statistically significant differences in UDVA between the groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The SM60AS group exhibited a slightly more myopic refractive outcome compared to the control group, while residual astigmatism remained comparable. No serious IOL-related complications were reported in either group.

Conclusion: The novel SM60AS IOL demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness and safety, with clinical outcomes comparable to those of the established control IOL in cataract surgery.

Trial registration: The trial was officially registered on August 29, 2020, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, with the registration number: ChiCTR2000037527 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=60164 ).

疏水非球面单焦人工晶状体成型工艺用于白内障手术的有效性和安全性。
背景:评价新型疏水非球面单焦点人工晶状体(IOL)在白内障手术中的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、平行对照的临床研究,在中国的9个地点进行。符合条件的参与者是年龄在60-80岁之间的成年人,诊断为年龄相关性白内障,计划行超声乳化术联合人工晶体植入术。受试者被随机分配接受非球面单焦点人工晶状体(SM60AS,河南西美迪斯生物技术有限公司,郑州,中国)或对照人工晶状体(SN60WF爱尔康实验室公司)。术后结果包括未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、最佳矫正距离视力(CDVA)、屈光状态和并发症,并在每次随访时进行评估和比较。结果:共有173例患者完成了研究,其中SM60AS组88例,SN60WF组85例。两组术后随访时CDVA差异无统计学意义。虽然SM60AS组在第1天UDVA略低,但第7天UDVA (p)。结论:新型SM60AS IOL具有令人满意的有效性和安全性,其临床结果与现有对照IOL在白内障手术中的临床结果相当。试验注册:该试验已于2020年8月29日在中国临床试验注册中心正式注册,注册编号:ChiCTR2000037527 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=60164)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信