"They tossed me up like a ball": informal settlement residents' experiences in accessing healthcare in Kampala, Uganda.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia Dickson-Gomez, Kirsten Beyer, Arthur Kiconco, Ronald Anguzu, Agnes Nyabigambo
{"title":"\"They tossed me up like a ball\": informal settlement residents' experiences in accessing healthcare in Kampala, Uganda.","authors":"Julia Dickson-Gomez, Kirsten Beyer, Arthur Kiconco, Ronald Anguzu, Agnes Nyabigambo","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23643-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most urban dwellers (55%) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) live in informal settlements. Informal settlement dwellers have higher disease risk and poorer quality of life than residents of formal urban environments, yet they have less access to healthcare. Despite benefits of most international health aid delivered through Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) such as the WHO, USAID, and PEPFAR in rapidly addressing specific conditions such as HIV, TB, malaria, many GHI have created parallel structures to existing health systems. This paper examines the experiences residents of informal settlements have in trying to access basic healthcare in the context of global health aid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this community-based study, we conducted focus group interviews (FGI) among 165 residents of six purposively selected informal settlements in Kampala, Central Uganda. Participants were purposively sampled to reflect participant demographics such as gender and age, with separate groups for males, females, youth and refugees. FGI asked residents about settlement formation, community challenges, governmental and non-governmental responsiveness, and health service delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated as needed. Inductive and deductive coding were used to merge codes into a final codebook, identifying emergent sub-themes and overarching themes summarized with supporting quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents described barriers to accessing three separate healthcare systems: the public health system (national and regional referral hospitals and district health centers), the private health system, and the international donor healthcare system. Dimensions of affordability and approachability limited healthcare access in both the public and private systems, while most residents were excluded from disease-specific international donor funded care. The focus group interviews indicated that private healthcare systems have created incentives to draw resources away from already depleted public healthcare systems, further decreasing access to the most vulnerable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reveals important and substantial gaps in the current healthcare system in Uganda. The main perceived health system challenges were its affordability and 'approachability' among residents of informal settlements. GHIs drain resources from the national health system and neglect coverage for non-priority diseases. We call upon policymakers to re-prioritize and respond to these health system challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23643-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most urban dwellers (55%) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) live in informal settlements. Informal settlement dwellers have higher disease risk and poorer quality of life than residents of formal urban environments, yet they have less access to healthcare. Despite benefits of most international health aid delivered through Global Health Initiatives (GHIs) such as the WHO, USAID, and PEPFAR in rapidly addressing specific conditions such as HIV, TB, malaria, many GHI have created parallel structures to existing health systems. This paper examines the experiences residents of informal settlements have in trying to access basic healthcare in the context of global health aid.

Methods: In this community-based study, we conducted focus group interviews (FGI) among 165 residents of six purposively selected informal settlements in Kampala, Central Uganda. Participants were purposively sampled to reflect participant demographics such as gender and age, with separate groups for males, females, youth and refugees. FGI asked residents about settlement formation, community challenges, governmental and non-governmental responsiveness, and health service delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated as needed. Inductive and deductive coding were used to merge codes into a final codebook, identifying emergent sub-themes and overarching themes summarized with supporting quotes.

Results: Residents described barriers to accessing three separate healthcare systems: the public health system (national and regional referral hospitals and district health centers), the private health system, and the international donor healthcare system. Dimensions of affordability and approachability limited healthcare access in both the public and private systems, while most residents were excluded from disease-specific international donor funded care. The focus group interviews indicated that private healthcare systems have created incentives to draw resources away from already depleted public healthcare systems, further decreasing access to the most vulnerable.

Conclusions: Our study reveals important and substantial gaps in the current healthcare system in Uganda. The main perceived health system challenges were its affordability and 'approachability' among residents of informal settlements. GHIs drain resources from the national health system and neglect coverage for non-priority diseases. We call upon policymakers to re-prioritize and respond to these health system challenges.

“他们像扔球一样把我扔起来”:乌干达坎帕拉非正式定居点居民获得医疗保健的经历。
背景:低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的大多数城市居民(55%)生活在非正式住区。与正规城市环境的居民相比,非正规住区居民的疾病风险更高,生活质量更差,但他们获得医疗保健的机会更少。尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)、美国国际开发署(USAID)和美国总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)等全球卫生倡议(Global health Initiatives, GHIs)提供的大多数国际卫生援助在迅速应对艾滋病毒、结核病、疟疾等特定疾病方面受益,但许多全球卫生倡议建立了与现有卫生系统平行的结构。本文考察了在全球卫生援助的背景下,非正式住区居民在试图获得基本医疗保健方面的经验。方法:在这项以社区为基础的研究中,我们对乌干达中部坎帕拉六个非正式定居点的165名居民进行了焦点小组访谈(FGI)。有意对参与者进行抽样,以反映参与者的人口统计数据,如性别和年龄,并分为男性、女性、青年和难民组。FGI向居民询问了定居点的形成、社区面临的挑战、政府和非政府组织的反应以及卫生服务的提供。采访录音,逐字抄写,并视需要进行翻译。归纳和演绎编码用于将代码合并到最终的代码本中,识别紧急的子主题和概括的主题,并以支持引号进行总结。结果:居民描述了进入三个独立的医疗保健系统的障碍:公共卫生系统(国家和地区转诊医院和地区卫生中心),私人卫生系统和国际供体卫生系统。可负担性和可接近性限制了公共和私人系统的医疗保健获取,而大多数居民被排除在特定疾病的国际捐助者资助的护理之外。焦点小组访谈表明,私营医疗保健系统创造了从已经枯竭的公共医疗保健系统中吸取资源的动机,进一步减少了对最弱势群体的访问。结论:我们的研究揭示了乌干达当前医疗保健系统的重要和实质性差距。人们认为卫生系统面临的主要挑战是其可负担性和非正式住区居民的“可接近性”。全球卫生保健系统消耗了国家卫生系统的资源,忽视了对非重点疾病的覆盖。我们呼吁决策者重新确定卫生系统挑战的优先次序并作出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信