Comparative study of 2D vs. 3D AI-enhanced ultrasound for fetal crown-rump length evaluation in the first trimester.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yuanji Zhang, Yuhao Huang, Chaoyu Chen, Xing Hu, Wenxiong Pan, Huanjia Luo, Yankai Huang, Haixia Wang, Yan Cao, Yan Yi, Yi Xiong, Dong Ni
{"title":"Comparative study of 2D vs. 3D AI-enhanced ultrasound for fetal crown-rump length evaluation in the first trimester.","authors":"Yuanji Zhang, Yuhao Huang, Chaoyu Chen, Xing Hu, Wenxiong Pan, Huanjia Luo, Yankai Huang, Haixia Wang, Yan Cao, Yan Yi, Yi Xiong, Dong Ni","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07823-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate fetal growth evaluation is crucial for monitoring fetal health, with crown-rump length (CRL) being the gold standard for estimating gestational age and assessing growth during the first trimester. To enhance CRL evaluation accuracy and efficiency, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model (3DCRL-Net) using the 3D U-Net architecture for automatic landmark detection to achieve CRL plane localization and measurement in 3D ultrasound. We then compared its performance to that of experienced radiologists using both 2D and 3D ultrasound for fetal growth assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective consecutive study collected fetal data from 1,326 ultrasound screenings conducted at 11-14 weeks of gestation (June 2021 to June 2023). Three experienced radiologists performed fetal screening using 2D video (2D-RAD) and 3D volume (3D-RAD) to obtain the CRL plane and measurement. The 3DCRL-Net model automatically outputs the landmark position, CRL plane localization and measurement. Three specialists audited the planes achieved by radiologists and 3DCRL-Net as standard or non-standard. The performance of CRL landmark detection, plane localization, measurement and time efficiency was evaluated in the internal testing dataset, comparing results with 3D-RAD. In the external dataset, CRL plane localization, measurement accuracy, and time efficiency were compared among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal dataset consisted of 126 cases in the testing set (training: validation: testing = 8:1:1), and the external dataset included 245 cases. On the internal testing set, 3DCRL-Net achieved a mean absolute distance error of 1.81 mm for the nine landmarks, higher accuracy in standard plane localization compared to 3D-RAD (91.27% vs. 80.16%), and strong consistency in CRL measurements (mean absolute error (MAE): 1.26 mm; mean difference: 0.37 mm, P = 0.70). The average time required per fetal case was 2.02 s for 3DCRL-Net versus 2 min for 3D-RAD (P < 0.001). On the external testing dataset, 3DCRL-Net demonstrated high performance in standard plane localization, achieving results comparable to 2D-RAD and 3D-RAD (accuracy: 91.43% vs. 93.06% vs. 86.12%), with strong consistency in CRL measurements, compared to 2D-RAD, which showed an MAE of 1.58 mm and a mean difference of 1.12 mm (P = 0.25). For 2D-RAD vs. 3DCRL-Net, the Pearson correlation and R² were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively, with an MAE of 0.11 ± 0.12 weeks. The average time required per fetal case was 5 s for 3DCRL-Net, compared to 2 min for 3D-RAD and 35 s for 2D-RAD (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3DCRL-Net model provides a rapid, accurate, and fully automated solution for CRL measurement in 3D ultrasound, achieving expert-level performance and significantly improving the efficiency and reliability of first-trimester fetal growth assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07823-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate fetal growth evaluation is crucial for monitoring fetal health, with crown-rump length (CRL) being the gold standard for estimating gestational age and assessing growth during the first trimester. To enhance CRL evaluation accuracy and efficiency, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model (3DCRL-Net) using the 3D U-Net architecture for automatic landmark detection to achieve CRL plane localization and measurement in 3D ultrasound. We then compared its performance to that of experienced radiologists using both 2D and 3D ultrasound for fetal growth assessment.

Materials and methods: This prospective consecutive study collected fetal data from 1,326 ultrasound screenings conducted at 11-14 weeks of gestation (June 2021 to June 2023). Three experienced radiologists performed fetal screening using 2D video (2D-RAD) and 3D volume (3D-RAD) to obtain the CRL plane and measurement. The 3DCRL-Net model automatically outputs the landmark position, CRL plane localization and measurement. Three specialists audited the planes achieved by radiologists and 3DCRL-Net as standard or non-standard. The performance of CRL landmark detection, plane localization, measurement and time efficiency was evaluated in the internal testing dataset, comparing results with 3D-RAD. In the external dataset, CRL plane localization, measurement accuracy, and time efficiency were compared among the three groups.

Results: The internal dataset consisted of 126 cases in the testing set (training: validation: testing = 8:1:1), and the external dataset included 245 cases. On the internal testing set, 3DCRL-Net achieved a mean absolute distance error of 1.81 mm for the nine landmarks, higher accuracy in standard plane localization compared to 3D-RAD (91.27% vs. 80.16%), and strong consistency in CRL measurements (mean absolute error (MAE): 1.26 mm; mean difference: 0.37 mm, P = 0.70). The average time required per fetal case was 2.02 s for 3DCRL-Net versus 2 min for 3D-RAD (P < 0.001). On the external testing dataset, 3DCRL-Net demonstrated high performance in standard plane localization, achieving results comparable to 2D-RAD and 3D-RAD (accuracy: 91.43% vs. 93.06% vs. 86.12%), with strong consistency in CRL measurements, compared to 2D-RAD, which showed an MAE of 1.58 mm and a mean difference of 1.12 mm (P = 0.25). For 2D-RAD vs. 3DCRL-Net, the Pearson correlation and R² were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively, with an MAE of 0.11 ± 0.12 weeks. The average time required per fetal case was 5 s for 3DCRL-Net, compared to 2 min for 3D-RAD and 35 s for 2D-RAD (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The 3DCRL-Net model provides a rapid, accurate, and fully automated solution for CRL measurement in 3D ultrasound, achieving expert-level performance and significantly improving the efficiency and reliability of first-trimester fetal growth assessment.

2D与3D ai增强超声在妊娠早期胎儿冠臀长度评估中的比较研究。
背景:准确的胎儿生长评估对监测胎儿健康至关重要,冠臀长(CRL)是估计胎龄和评估前三个月生长的金标准。为了提高CRL评估的准确性和效率,我们开发了一种基于人工智能(AI)的模型(3DCRL-Net),利用3D U-Net架构进行自动地标检测,实现3D超声中CRL平面的定位和测量。然后我们将其性能与经验丰富的放射科医生使用2D和3D超声进行胎儿生长评估进行比较。材料和方法:本前瞻性连续研究收集了1,326例妊娠11-14周(2021年6月至2023年6月)超声筛查的胎儿数据。三名经验丰富的放射科医生使用2D视频(2D- rad)和3D体积(3D- rad)进行胎儿筛查,以获得CRL平面和测量值。3DCRL-Net模型自动输出地标位置、CRL平面定位和测量。三名专家对放射科医生和3DCRL-Net所获得的平面进行标准或非标准审核。在内部测试数据集中评估CRL地标检测、平面定位、测量和时间效率的性能,并将结果与3D-RAD进行比较。在外部数据集中,比较三组间的CRL平面定位、测量精度和时间效率。结果:内部数据集包含126例测试集(训练:验证:测试= 8:1:1),外部数据集包含245例。在内部测试集中,3DCRL-Net对9个地标的平均绝对距离误差为1.81 mm,标准平面定位精度高于3D-RAD(91.27%比80.16%),CRL测量结果一致性强(平均绝对误差(MAE): 1.26 mm;平均差值:0.37 mm, P = 0.70)。3DCRL-Net模型平均每例胎儿所需时间为2.02 s,而3D- rad模型为2 min (P)。结论:3DCRL-Net模型为三维超声CRL测量提供了快速、准确、全自动的解决方案,达到了专家水平,显著提高了早期妊娠胎儿生长评估的效率和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信