Superior diagnostic performance of computed tomography over abdominal ultrasound for ovarian cancer detection.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/FEQD5607
Ming Wu, Hui Zhang, Si Wang, Guangjin Bao
{"title":"Superior diagnostic performance of computed tomography over abdominal ultrasound for ovarian cancer detection.","authors":"Ming Wu, Hui Zhang, Si Wang, Guangjin Bao","doi":"10.62347/FEQD5607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical use of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis of ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 120 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 2021 and June 2024. All patients underwent both abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) examinations. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were compared between the two modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to abdominal ultrasound in all evaluated criteria. Specifically, CT exhibited higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. In addition, CT demonstrated superior performance for assessing tumor characteristics, a solid component, peritoneal involvement, lymph node metastasis, tumor vascularity, metastasis, and ovarian cystic lesions. Statistically significant differences were observed in the diagnostic accuracy for both early- and advanced-stages of ovarian cancer, highlighting CT's ability to deliver more accurate, reliable, and comprehensive information compared to ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT outperformed abdominal ultrasound in diagnosing ovarian cancer, demonstrating superior sensitivity, specificity, and definition of tumor characteristics, metastasis, peritoneal involvement, and lymph node detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 6","pages":"4849-4858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/FEQD5607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical use of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included 120 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 2021 and June 2024. All patients underwent both abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) examinations. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were compared between the two modalities.

Results: CT demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to abdominal ultrasound in all evaluated criteria. Specifically, CT exhibited higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. In addition, CT demonstrated superior performance for assessing tumor characteristics, a solid component, peritoneal involvement, lymph node metastasis, tumor vascularity, metastasis, and ovarian cystic lesions. Statistically significant differences were observed in the diagnostic accuracy for both early- and advanced-stages of ovarian cancer, highlighting CT's ability to deliver more accurate, reliable, and comprehensive information compared to ultrasound.

Conclusion: CT outperformed abdominal ultrasound in diagnosing ovarian cancer, demonstrating superior sensitivity, specificity, and definition of tumor characteristics, metastasis, peritoneal involvement, and lymph node detection.

计算机断层扫描对卵巢癌的诊断优于腹部超声。
目的:探讨计算机断层扫描(CT)在卵巢癌诊断中的应用价值。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2021年1月至2024年6月期间诊断为卵巢癌的120例患者。所有患者均行腹部超声和计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。比较两种方法的诊断性能,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性。结果:与腹部超声相比,CT在所有评估标准中表现出优越的诊断性能。具体来说,CT表现出更高的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV。此外,CT在评估肿瘤特征、实体成分、腹膜受累、淋巴结转移、肿瘤血管分布、转移和卵巢囊性病变方面表现优异。在早期和晚期卵巢癌的诊断准确性上观察到统计学上的显著差异,这表明与超声相比,CT能够提供更准确、可靠和全面的信息。结论:CT对卵巢癌的诊断优于腹部超声,在肿瘤特征、转移、腹膜受累及淋巴结检测方面具有更高的敏感性、特异性和明确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信