Femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation enhances biomechanical stability in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a comparative biomechanical study.
{"title":"Femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation enhances biomechanical stability in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a comparative biomechanical study.","authors":"Xu-Chao Shi, Zhen-Tao Chu, Yi-Wen Yuan, Xiao-Long Xia, Wei-Long Li, Chuan-Bao Wang, Jiao-Jiao Hu","doi":"10.62347/OUBC8362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study proposed a novel fixation method - femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation (FCDSF) - and evaluated its biomechanical performance. The fixation's mechanical properties were assessed and compared with those of inverted triangular parallel cannulated screws (3CS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four synthetic femur models were allocated into three reduction groups simulating positive buttress, anatomical reduction, and negative buttress conditions. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 6), fixed with FCDSF, 3CS, or BDSF. Torsional tests measured torque at the fracture site under 2° and 4° rotation. Load-to-failure tests were then conducted by applying continuous pressure until failure occurred, and the ultimate loads were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under all reduction conditions, FCDSF demonstrated significantly greater torque at both rotation angles compared with 3CS (P < 0.05), while difference with BDSF was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). FCDSF showed superior load-bearing capacity over both BDSF and 3CS across all conditions (P < 0.05). In both the FCDSF and BDSF groups, positive buttress and anatomical reductions provided significantly better resistance to torsion and shear than negative buttress configurations (both P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). In the 3CS group, only the positive buttress configuration showed a significant improvement over the negative buttress (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FCDSF provides enhanced anti-shear and anti-rotational stability compared with 3CS in managing Pauwels type III FNFs. Negative buttress reduction should be avoided due to its inferior biomechanical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 6","pages":"4445-4454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/OUBC8362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study proposed a novel fixation method - femoral calcar double-supported screw fixation (FCDSF) - and evaluated its biomechanical performance. The fixation's mechanical properties were assessed and compared with those of inverted triangular parallel cannulated screws (3CS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs).
Methods: Fifty-four synthetic femur models were allocated into three reduction groups simulating positive buttress, anatomical reduction, and negative buttress conditions. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 6), fixed with FCDSF, 3CS, or BDSF. Torsional tests measured torque at the fracture site under 2° and 4° rotation. Load-to-failure tests were then conducted by applying continuous pressure until failure occurred, and the ultimate loads were recorded.
Results: Under all reduction conditions, FCDSF demonstrated significantly greater torque at both rotation angles compared with 3CS (P < 0.05), while difference with BDSF was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). FCDSF showed superior load-bearing capacity over both BDSF and 3CS across all conditions (P < 0.05). In both the FCDSF and BDSF groups, positive buttress and anatomical reductions provided significantly better resistance to torsion and shear than negative buttress configurations (both P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). In the 3CS group, only the positive buttress configuration showed a significant improvement over the negative buttress (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: FCDSF provides enhanced anti-shear and anti-rotational stability compared with 3CS in managing Pauwels type III FNFs. Negative buttress reduction should be avoided due to its inferior biomechanical performance.