From lexicon to phrase: Behavioral evidence for a dynamic cognitive mechanism underlying language control.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105277
Qingwei Xue, Qiping Wang, Junjie Wu, Luyao Chen
{"title":"From lexicon to phrase: Behavioral evidence for a dynamic cognitive mechanism underlying language control.","authors":"Qingwei Xue, Qiping Wang, Junjie Wu, Luyao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined language control at both lexical and phrasal levels, and their relationships with general cognitive control. Thirty-three participants completed two picture-naming tasks assessing lexical and phrasal control. We measured mixing costs (i.e., the index of proactive language control) and switch costs (i.e., the index of reactive language control), and examined their relationships with general proactive cognitive control, assessed by the Proactive Behavioral Index (PBI) from the AX-CPT task, and with general reactive cognitive control, assessed by Stroop scores from the Stroop task. Results revealed greater L1 than L2 mixing costs at both linguistic levels. Switch costs were symmetrical at the lexical level but asymmetrical at the phrasal level. PBI predicted mixing costs at both linguistic levels, whereas Stroop scores predicted switch costs only at the phrasal level. These findings suggest that bilinguals rely on proactive control to monitor bilingual lexical competition, whereas both proactive and reactive control are engaged at the phrasal level. This study proposes a hypothesis that control demands vary across linguistic levels, influencing the adaptation of language control mechanisms and their relationships with general cognitive control.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"258 ","pages":"105277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined language control at both lexical and phrasal levels, and their relationships with general cognitive control. Thirty-three participants completed two picture-naming tasks assessing lexical and phrasal control. We measured mixing costs (i.e., the index of proactive language control) and switch costs (i.e., the index of reactive language control), and examined their relationships with general proactive cognitive control, assessed by the Proactive Behavioral Index (PBI) from the AX-CPT task, and with general reactive cognitive control, assessed by Stroop scores from the Stroop task. Results revealed greater L1 than L2 mixing costs at both linguistic levels. Switch costs were symmetrical at the lexical level but asymmetrical at the phrasal level. PBI predicted mixing costs at both linguistic levels, whereas Stroop scores predicted switch costs only at the phrasal level. These findings suggest that bilinguals rely on proactive control to monitor bilingual lexical competition, whereas both proactive and reactive control are engaged at the phrasal level. This study proposes a hypothesis that control demands vary across linguistic levels, influencing the adaptation of language control mechanisms and their relationships with general cognitive control.

从词汇到短语:语言控制背后动态认知机制的行为证据。
本研究考察了词汇和短语两个层面的语言控制,以及它们与一般认知控制的关系。33名参与者完成了两项图片命名任务,评估词汇和短语控制能力。我们测量了混合成本(即主动语言控制指数)和转换成本(即反应性语言控制指数),并考察了它们与一般主动认知控制(用AX-CPT任务的主动行为指数(PBI)评估)和一般反应性认知控制(用Stroop任务的Stroop分数评估)的关系。结果显示,在两种语言水平上,母语混合成本都高于第二语言混合成本。转换成本在词汇水平上是对称的,而在短语水平上是不对称的。PBI预测了两种语言水平上的混合成本,而Stroop分数只预测了短语水平上的转换成本。这些发现表明,双语者依靠主动控制来监控双语词汇竞争,而主动控制和被动控制都在短语层面进行。本研究提出了一种假设,即控制需求在不同的语言水平上存在差异,影响语言控制机制的适应及其与一般认知控制的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信