Liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection: an exploration road from evidence to implementation.

IF 18.8 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yongjie Xu, Sibo Zhu, Changfa Xia, Hui Yu, Si Shi, Kezhong Chen, Yue He, Chuxia Deng, Haoxuan Jin, Jing Liu, Rebecca Fitzgerald, Partha Basu, Wanqing Chen
{"title":"Liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection: an exploration road from evidence to implementation.","authors":"Yongjie Xu, Sibo Zhu, Changfa Xia, Hui Yu, Si Shi, Kezhong Chen, Yue He, Chuxia Deng, Haoxuan Jin, Jing Liu, Rebecca Fitzgerald, Partha Basu, Wanqing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current cancer screening methods are limited in scope, often detecting only a few cancer types with low positive predictive value and suboptimal patient adherence. In recent years, liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) has emerged as a promising approach to revolutionize cancer control. Despite several MCED tests reaching clinical trial phases and seeking regulatory approval, none have yet been approved for clinical use, highlighting uncertainties regarding their efficacy and applicability. This review comprehensively examines the advancements in MCED technologies and offers insights into the selection of cancer types for inclusion in MCED panels. We explore the clinical development pathway for MCED, from biomarker discovery and analytical validation to large-scale randomized controlled trials, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate endpoints such as reducing late-stage cancer incidence or cancer-specific mortality. Key challenges, including achieving optimal sensitivity for early-stage cancers, minimizing false positives and negatives, and ensuring equitable access to MCED tests, are also addressed. Finally, we evaluate the added value and health economic benefits of integrating MCED into established healthcare systems through widespread implementation. By providing a thorough analysis of these aspects, this review aims to advance the field of cancer screening and guide future research and development efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":421,"journal":{"name":"Science Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current cancer screening methods are limited in scope, often detecting only a few cancer types with low positive predictive value and suboptimal patient adherence. In recent years, liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) has emerged as a promising approach to revolutionize cancer control. Despite several MCED tests reaching clinical trial phases and seeking regulatory approval, none have yet been approved for clinical use, highlighting uncertainties regarding their efficacy and applicability. This review comprehensively examines the advancements in MCED technologies and offers insights into the selection of cancer types for inclusion in MCED panels. We explore the clinical development pathway for MCED, from biomarker discovery and analytical validation to large-scale randomized controlled trials, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate endpoints such as reducing late-stage cancer incidence or cancer-specific mortality. Key challenges, including achieving optimal sensitivity for early-stage cancers, minimizing false positives and negatives, and ensuring equitable access to MCED tests, are also addressed. Finally, we evaluate the added value and health economic benefits of integrating MCED into established healthcare systems through widespread implementation. By providing a thorough analysis of these aspects, this review aims to advance the field of cancer screening and guide future research and development efforts.

基于液体活检的多癌早期检测:一条从证据到实施的探索之路。
目前的癌症筛查方法范围有限,往往只能检测到几种阳性预测值低、患者依从性不佳的癌症类型。近年来,基于液体活检的多癌早期检测(MCED)已成为一种有前途的癌症控制方法。尽管有几项MCED测试已进入临床试验阶段,并正在寻求监管部门的批准,但尚未有一项被批准用于临床,这凸显了其疗效和适用性的不确定性。这篇综述全面考察了MCED技术的进步,并为MCED小组中癌症类型的选择提供了见解。我们探索了MCED的临床发展途径,从生物标志物发现和分析验证到大规模随机对照试验,强调了选择适当终点的重要性,如降低晚期癌症发病率或癌症特异性死亡率。还讨论了主要挑战,包括实现对早期癌症的最佳敏感性,尽量减少假阳性和阴性,以及确保公平获得MCED检测。最后,我们评估了通过广泛实施将MCED整合到现有医疗系统中的附加价值和健康经济效益。通过对这些方面的深入分析,本文旨在推动癌症筛查领域的发展,并指导未来的研究和开发工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Bulletin
Science Bulletin MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
24.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
8092
期刊介绍: Science Bulletin (Sci. Bull., formerly known as Chinese Science Bulletin) is a multidisciplinary academic journal supervised by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and co-sponsored by the CAS and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). Sci. Bull. is a semi-monthly international journal publishing high-caliber peer-reviewed research on a broad range of natural sciences and high-tech fields on the basis of its originality, scientific significance and whether it is of general interest. In addition, we are committed to serving the scientific community with immediate, authoritative news and valuable insights into upcoming trends around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信