Risk factors for low-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study within the FinRSPC trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Uzoamaka E Okwor, Jani Raitanen, Kirsi Talala, Teuvo L J Tammela, Kimmo Taari, Paula Kujala, Anssi Auvinen
{"title":"Risk factors for low-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study within the FinRSPC trial.","authors":"Uzoamaka E Okwor, Jani Raitanen, Kirsi Talala, Teuvo L J Tammela, Kimmo Taari, Paula Kujala, Anssi Auvinen","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer (PC), often accompanied by overtreatment, remains an important harmful consequence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening. Although PSA screening can reduce PC mortality and metastatic PC, the balance of benefits and harms remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study of 80,144 men from the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, with a median follow-up of 18.0 years, compared determinants of low-risk PC with determinants of high-risk PC. Low-risk PC (N = 1774) was classified according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, excluding cases with subsequent PC death. A secondary analysis excluded cases with post-diagnosis disease progression. Intermediate, high-risk, and advanced cases were classified as high-risk PC (N = 6466). Poisson regression was used to analyze PC incidence. Low-risk PC was more common in the screening than the control arm (1.9 vs. 1.2 cases per 1000 person-years), whereas high-risk PC was more frequent in the control arm (5.7 vs. 5.4 cases per 1000 person-years in the screening arm). The risk of low-risk PC remained stable across screening rounds, while the risk for high-risk PC declined after the first screen. Age was associated with an increased risk of high-risk PC, but no clear trend by age was observed for low-risk PC. Family history and use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors showed stronger associations with low-risk PC than high-risk PC, though less so for screen-detected cancers. These suggest that risk factors for low-risk PC differ from those for high-risk PC, with determinants of low-risk PC being more closely related to medical service use.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer (PC), often accompanied by overtreatment, remains an important harmful consequence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening. Although PSA screening can reduce PC mortality and metastatic PC, the balance of benefits and harms remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study of 80,144 men from the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, with a median follow-up of 18.0 years, compared determinants of low-risk PC with determinants of high-risk PC. Low-risk PC (N = 1774) was classified according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, excluding cases with subsequent PC death. A secondary analysis excluded cases with post-diagnosis disease progression. Intermediate, high-risk, and advanced cases were classified as high-risk PC (N = 6466). Poisson regression was used to analyze PC incidence. Low-risk PC was more common in the screening than the control arm (1.9 vs. 1.2 cases per 1000 person-years), whereas high-risk PC was more frequent in the control arm (5.7 vs. 5.4 cases per 1000 person-years in the screening arm). The risk of low-risk PC remained stable across screening rounds, while the risk for high-risk PC declined after the first screen. Age was associated with an increased risk of high-risk PC, but no clear trend by age was observed for low-risk PC. Family history and use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors showed stronger associations with low-risk PC than high-risk PC, though less so for screen-detected cancers. These suggest that risk factors for low-risk PC differ from those for high-risk PC, with determinants of low-risk PC being more closely related to medical service use.

低风险前列腺癌的危险因素:FinRSPC试验中的回顾性队列研究。
低危前列腺癌(PC)的过度诊断,往往伴随着过度治疗,仍然是基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的一个重要有害后果。尽管PSA筛查可以降低前列腺癌死亡率和转移性前列腺癌,但利弊平衡仍存在争议。这项来自芬兰前列腺癌随机筛查研究的80,144名男性的回顾性队列研究,中位随访时间为18.0年,比较了低风险前列腺癌和高风险前列腺癌的决定因素。低风险PC (N = 1774)根据欧洲泌尿外科协会指南分类,排除随后PC死亡的病例。二次分析排除了诊断后疾病进展的病例。中度、高危和晚期病例被归类为高危PC (N = 6466)。用泊松回归分析PC发病率。低风险PC在筛查组中比对照组更常见(每1000人年1.9例对1.2例),而高风险PC在对照组更常见(筛查组每1000人年5.7例对5.4例)。低风险PC的风险在筛查过程中保持稳定,而高风险PC的风险在第一次筛查后下降。年龄与高危PC的风险增加有关,但低危PC没有明显的年龄变化趋势。家族史和5- α还原酶抑制剂的使用与低风险PC的相关性比高风险PC强,但与筛查检测到的癌症的相关性较低。这表明低风险PC的危险因素不同于高风险PC,低风险PC的决定因素与医疗服务使用更密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信