Comment on “The Evolution of Inflation Expectations in Japan”

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tsutomu Watanabe
{"title":"Comment on “The Evolution of Inflation Expectations in Japan”","authors":"Tsutomu Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/aepr.12514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The basic idea of Fukuda and Soma (<span>2025</span>) is that the variation in inflation expectations among forecasters is due to their differing forecasts about future output gaps, crude oil prices, and exchange rates. They find that factors like the output gap can explain some of the variation in inflation expectations, but not the majority. Specifically, Fukuda and Soma's (<span>2025</span>) table 2 indicates an <i>R</i>\n <sup>2</sup> around 0.3, suggesting that other hidden variables may play a more significant role in determining the variation in inflation expectations.</p><p>In the spring of 2022, economists had two conflicting views when inflation rates began to rise. One view was that the increase in import prices would eventually stop, and when that happened, the rise in domestic prices would also cease (referred to as the “transitory” view). The other view was that domestic prices would continue to rise even after import prices stopped rising (referred to as the “persistent” view). In other words, there was a difference in consumer price index (CPI) inflation expectations depending on whether or not the increase in import prices would permanently impact domestic prices. The sources of such a variation in inflation expectations are not considered in Fukuda and Soma (<span>2025</span>).</p><p>In addition, according to Diamond et al. (<span>2020</span>), an individual's expectations of inflation are influenced by the inflation they have experienced in their lifetime. Even among the forecasters participating in the ESP Survey, there are different generations. For example, those who experienced high inflation in the 1970s may have higher inflation expectations, while those who grew up during deflation in the 1990s may have lower inflation expectations. This source of variation in inflation expectations is also not considered in Fukuda and Soma (<span>2025</span>).</p><p>The critical point is whether the forecasters' expectations are aligned with the Bank of Japan's (BOJ's) target of 2%. Figure 1 displays the distribution of inflation expectations from around 40 forecasters who participated in the ESP survey. The forecasts were made in September each year (specifically, September 2021, September 2022, September 2023, and September 2024). Their predictions for the inflation rate for the upcoming fiscal year were considered for each forecast time. For example, in September 2021, before inflation began in Japan, the mode of distribution was 0.6%, indicating that most forecasters were predicting an inflation rate close to 0%. However, over time, the distribution has gradually shifted to the right. The most recent survey results from September 2024 show that the mode of distribution is 1.8% to 1.9%, which is quite close to the BOJ's target of 2%. Nonetheless, there is still a significant variation in inflation forecasts, with some forecasters predicting inflation significantly below 2% and others predicting inflation above 2%. This indicates that the forecasters' inflation forecasts have not yet been fully anchored at 2%.</p><p>If we apply the method developed by Fukuda and Soma (<span>2025</span>) to account for differences in the forecasts of the output gap and other factors, the shape and position of the distribution may change slightly. However, since their estimates have a small R-squared, the change will likely be minimal. It is unclear where the remaining variation in inflation expectations in September 2024 comes from. Nevertheless, it seems undeniable that, as of September 2024, the ESP Survey participants' inflation expectations are anchored, if not fully, to the BOJ's 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":45430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Policy Review","volume":"20 2","pages":"218-219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aepr.12514","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The basic idea of Fukuda and Soma (2025) is that the variation in inflation expectations among forecasters is due to their differing forecasts about future output gaps, crude oil prices, and exchange rates. They find that factors like the output gap can explain some of the variation in inflation expectations, but not the majority. Specifically, Fukuda and Soma's (2025) table 2 indicates an R 2 around 0.3, suggesting that other hidden variables may play a more significant role in determining the variation in inflation expectations.

In the spring of 2022, economists had two conflicting views when inflation rates began to rise. One view was that the increase in import prices would eventually stop, and when that happened, the rise in domestic prices would also cease (referred to as the “transitory” view). The other view was that domestic prices would continue to rise even after import prices stopped rising (referred to as the “persistent” view). In other words, there was a difference in consumer price index (CPI) inflation expectations depending on whether or not the increase in import prices would permanently impact domestic prices. The sources of such a variation in inflation expectations are not considered in Fukuda and Soma (2025).

In addition, according to Diamond et al. (2020), an individual's expectations of inflation are influenced by the inflation they have experienced in their lifetime. Even among the forecasters participating in the ESP Survey, there are different generations. For example, those who experienced high inflation in the 1970s may have higher inflation expectations, while those who grew up during deflation in the 1990s may have lower inflation expectations. This source of variation in inflation expectations is also not considered in Fukuda and Soma (2025).

The critical point is whether the forecasters' expectations are aligned with the Bank of Japan's (BOJ's) target of 2%. Figure 1 displays the distribution of inflation expectations from around 40 forecasters who participated in the ESP survey. The forecasts were made in September each year (specifically, September 2021, September 2022, September 2023, and September 2024). Their predictions for the inflation rate for the upcoming fiscal year were considered for each forecast time. For example, in September 2021, before inflation began in Japan, the mode of distribution was 0.6%, indicating that most forecasters were predicting an inflation rate close to 0%. However, over time, the distribution has gradually shifted to the right. The most recent survey results from September 2024 show that the mode of distribution is 1.8% to 1.9%, which is quite close to the BOJ's target of 2%. Nonetheless, there is still a significant variation in inflation forecasts, with some forecasters predicting inflation significantly below 2% and others predicting inflation above 2%. This indicates that the forecasters' inflation forecasts have not yet been fully anchored at 2%.

If we apply the method developed by Fukuda and Soma (2025) to account for differences in the forecasts of the output gap and other factors, the shape and position of the distribution may change slightly. However, since their estimates have a small R-squared, the change will likely be minimal. It is unclear where the remaining variation in inflation expectations in September 2024 comes from. Nevertheless, it seems undeniable that, as of September 2024, the ESP Survey participants' inflation expectations are anchored, if not fully, to the BOJ's 2.

Abstract Image

评《日本通胀预期的演变》
福田和索玛(2025)的基本观点是,预测者之间通胀预期的差异是由于他们对未来产出缺口、原油价格和汇率的预测不同。他们发现,像产出缺口这样的因素可以解释通胀预期的一些变化,但不是大多数。具体而言,Fukuda和Soma(2025)的表2表明r2在0.3左右,这表明其他隐藏变量可能在决定通胀预期变化方面发挥更重要的作用。2022年春天,当通胀率开始上升时,经济学家们有两种相互矛盾的观点。一种观点认为,进口价格的上涨最终会停止,而当这种情况发生时,国内价格的上涨也会停止(被称为“暂时”观点)。另一种观点认为,即使进口价格停止上涨,国内价格仍将继续上涨(称为“持续”观点)。换句话说,消费者价格指数(CPI)通胀预期的差异取决于进口价格上涨是否会永久影响国内价格。Fukuda和Soma(2025)没有考虑这种通胀预期变化的来源。此外,根据Diamond等人(2020)的研究,个人对通货膨胀的预期受到其一生中经历的通货膨胀的影响。即使在参与ESP调查的预测者中,也有不同的世代。例如,在20世纪70年代经历过高通胀的人可能有更高的通胀预期,而在90年代通缩时期长大的人可能有更低的通胀预期。Fukuda和Soma(2025)也没有考虑通胀预期变化的这一来源。关键的一点是预测者的预期是否与日本银行2%的目标一致。图1显示了参与ESP调查的大约40位预测者的通胀预期分布。预测是在每年的9月份进行的(具体来说是2021年9月、2022年9月、2023年9月和2024年9月)。他们对即将到来的财政年度通货膨胀率的预测是在每次预测时考虑的。例如,2021年9月,在日本通货膨胀开始之前,分布模式为0.6%,这表明大多数预测者预测通货膨胀率接近0%。然而,随着时间的推移,分布逐渐向右转移。从2024年9月开始的最新调查结果显示,其分布模式为1.8%至1.9%,这与日本央行2%的目标相当接近。尽管如此,人们对通胀的预测仍存在很大差异,一些预测者预计通胀将大大低于2%,而另一些预测者预计通胀将高于2%。这表明预测者的通胀预测还没有完全固定在2%。如果我们采用Fukuda和Soma(2025)开发的方法来考虑产出缺口预测和其他因素的差异,那么分布的形状和位置可能会略有变化。然而,由于他们的估计有一个小的r平方,变化可能是最小的。目前尚不清楚2024年9月通胀预期的剩余变化来自何处。然而,似乎不可否认的是,截至2024年9月,ESP调查参与者的通胀预期(如果不是完全的话)锚定在日本央行的2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The goal of the Asian Economic Policy Review is to become an intellectual voice on the current issues of international economics and economic policy, based on comprehensive and in-depth analyses, with a primary focus on Asia. Emphasis is placed on identifying key issues at the time - spanning international trade, international finance, the environment, energy, the integration of regional economies and other issues - in order to furnish ideas and proposals to contribute positively to the policy debate in the region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信