Scaling Up Bark Hydrology: Tree Size and Functional Traits Shape Water Storage in a Tropical Cloud Forest

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Kelly Cristina Tonello, Juliano Carvalho de Oliveira, Roberto Starzynski, Sergio Dias Campos
{"title":"Scaling Up Bark Hydrology: Tree Size and Functional Traits Shape Water Storage in a Tropical Cloud Forest","authors":"Kelly Cristina Tonello,&nbsp;Juliano Carvalho de Oliveira,&nbsp;Roberto Starzynski,&nbsp;Sergio Dias Campos","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bark has long been overlooked as a component of forest water cycling, particularly in fog-dependent tropical montane cloud forests (TMCFs). Here, we quantified the water absorption capacity of bark in 17 tree species from a Brazilian TMCF and evaluated how functional traits and tree size influence bark water uptake (BWU) at the whole-tree scale. Bark samples were saturated in the lab, and field data were used to estimate water uptake per tree. While BD and BWSC showed limited interspecific variation, BWU varied greatly, mainly due to bark volume (Vb). A multiple regression model explained 89.5% of the variation in BWU. Sensitivity and bootstrapping analyses confirmed that, although Vb was the dominant predictor, functional bark traits (BD and BWSC) also contributed significantly to water uptake. These findings highlight that BWU is shaped by both structural and functional traits, underscoring a dual control on bark hydrology. Critically endangered (<i>Araucaria angustifolia</i>) and ecologically dominant (<i>Senna multijuga</i>) species exhibited the highest water storage per tree. Although the absolute values represent the potential maxima under laboratory conditions, the comparative data provide insights into species-level contributions to forest water dynamics. Notably, bark water uptake may help maintain moisture availability during dry spells or fog-free intervals, particularly in ecosystems where rainfall is intermittent and canopy-dwelling organisms depend on sustained humidity. Our results suggest that bark traits should be more explicitly considered in hydrological models and conservation planning for TMCFs under changing climate regimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bark has long been overlooked as a component of forest water cycling, particularly in fog-dependent tropical montane cloud forests (TMCFs). Here, we quantified the water absorption capacity of bark in 17 tree species from a Brazilian TMCF and evaluated how functional traits and tree size influence bark water uptake (BWU) at the whole-tree scale. Bark samples were saturated in the lab, and field data were used to estimate water uptake per tree. While BD and BWSC showed limited interspecific variation, BWU varied greatly, mainly due to bark volume (Vb). A multiple regression model explained 89.5% of the variation in BWU. Sensitivity and bootstrapping analyses confirmed that, although Vb was the dominant predictor, functional bark traits (BD and BWSC) also contributed significantly to water uptake. These findings highlight that BWU is shaped by both structural and functional traits, underscoring a dual control on bark hydrology. Critically endangered (Araucaria angustifolia) and ecologically dominant (Senna multijuga) species exhibited the highest water storage per tree. Although the absolute values represent the potential maxima under laboratory conditions, the comparative data provide insights into species-level contributions to forest water dynamics. Notably, bark water uptake may help maintain moisture availability during dry spells or fog-free intervals, particularly in ecosystems where rainfall is intermittent and canopy-dwelling organisms depend on sustained humidity. Our results suggest that bark traits should be more explicitly considered in hydrological models and conservation planning for TMCFs under changing climate regimes.

Abstract Image

扩大树皮水文学:树木的大小和功能特征影响了热带云雾林的储水量
树皮作为森林水循环的一个组成部分一直被忽视,特别是在依赖雾的热带山地云雾林(tmcf)中。在这里,我们量化了来自巴西TMCF的17种树种的树皮吸水能力,并在全树尺度上评估了功能性状和树的大小如何影响树皮吸水(BWU)。树皮样品在实验室中被饱和,并使用现场数据来估计每棵树的吸水量。种间差异有限,而种间差异较大,主要与树皮体积(Vb)有关。多元回归模型解释了89.5%的BWU变异。敏感性和自启动分析证实,虽然Vb是主要的预测因子,但树皮的功能性状(BD和BWSC)也对水分吸收有显著影响。这些发现强调了BWU是由结构和功能特征共同塑造的,强调了树皮水文的双重控制。极度濒危物种(Araucaria angustifolia)和生态优势物种(Senna multijuga)的单树储水量最高。虽然绝对值代表了实验室条件下的潜在最大值,但比较数据提供了对物种水平对森林水动力学的贡献的见解。值得注意的是,树皮的水分吸收可能有助于在干旱期或无雾期保持水分的有效性,特别是在降雨间歇性和树冠生物依赖持续湿度的生态系统中。我们的研究结果表明,在气候变化条件下,在水文模型和tmcf保护规划中应更明确地考虑树皮性状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信