The Risk of Colonoscopy-related Bleeding in Patients With or Without Continued Treatment With an Antithrombotic Agent

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70175
Emi Nonaka, Ichitaro Horiuchi, Akira Horiuchi, Satoshi Ukai, Noriko Takahata, Kimihiko Oishi
{"title":"The Risk of Colonoscopy-related Bleeding in Patients With or Without Continued Treatment With an Antithrombotic Agent","authors":"Emi Nonaka,&nbsp;Ichitaro Horiuchi,&nbsp;Akira Horiuchi,&nbsp;Satoshi Ukai,&nbsp;Noriko Takahata,&nbsp;Kimihiko Oishi","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively investigated the risk of colonoscopy-related bleeding in relation to antithrombotic treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study (NCT02594813) enrolled consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy, including the removal of colorectal polyps, regardless of the continuation of antithrombotic treatment. The primary outcome measure was delayed bleeding in the patients who underwent a hot snare polypectomy and/or endoscopic mucosal resection in addition to a cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and required endoscopic treatment ≤2 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were immediate bleeding and the number of hemostatic clips used during the procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2019 to December 2023 at our institution, 1562 (mean age 75 years) and 15,769 (mean age, 64 years) patients underwent colonoscopy with or without antithrombotic treatment, respectively. Immediate bleeding following the removal of colorectal polyps, regardless of the polypectomy technique, occurred in 173 (33.86%) of the 511 patients with antithrombotic treatment, which was significantly more frequent than in 439 (9.44%) of the 4651 patients without antithrombotic treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in delayed bleeding after CSP between the two groups (0.41% vs. 0.11%, <i>p</i> = 0.15). However, the incidence of delayed bleeding following polypectomy was significantly higher in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment compared to those without it (seven of 511 [1.37%] vs. 12 of 4651 [0.26%], <i>p</i> = 0.0016).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of delayed bleeding after colonoscopy with removal of colorectal polyps was low despite continuation of antithrombotic therapy. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02594813).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We prospectively investigated the risk of colonoscopy-related bleeding in relation to antithrombotic treatment.

Methods

This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study (NCT02594813) enrolled consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy, including the removal of colorectal polyps, regardless of the continuation of antithrombotic treatment. The primary outcome measure was delayed bleeding in the patients who underwent a hot snare polypectomy and/or endoscopic mucosal resection in addition to a cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and required endoscopic treatment ≤2 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were immediate bleeding and the number of hemostatic clips used during the procedure.

Results

From January 2019 to December 2023 at our institution, 1562 (mean age 75 years) and 15,769 (mean age, 64 years) patients underwent colonoscopy with or without antithrombotic treatment, respectively. Immediate bleeding following the removal of colorectal polyps, regardless of the polypectomy technique, occurred in 173 (33.86%) of the 511 patients with antithrombotic treatment, which was significantly more frequent than in 439 (9.44%) of the 4651 patients without antithrombotic treatment (p < 0.001). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in delayed bleeding after CSP between the two groups (0.41% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.15). However, the incidence of delayed bleeding following polypectomy was significantly higher in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment compared to those without it (seven of 511 [1.37%] vs. 12 of 4651 [0.26%], p = 0.0016).

Conclusions

The risk of delayed bleeding after colonoscopy with removal of colorectal polyps was low despite continuation of antithrombotic therapy. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02594813).

Abstract Image

结肠镜相关出血的风险在患者接受或不接受抗血栓药物治疗
目的:前瞻性研究结肠镜相关出血风险与抗栓治疗的关系。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性、单中心队列研究(NCT02594813)招募了连续接受结肠镜检查的患者,包括切除结肠直肠息肉,无论是否继续进行抗血栓治疗。主要结局指标是在冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)之外进行热圈套息肉切除术和/或内镜粘膜切除术并在手术后≤2周需要内镜治疗的患者的延迟出血。次要结果是立即出血和手术过程中使用的止血夹的数量。结果2019年1月至2023年12月,在我院,分别有1562例(平均年龄75岁)和15769例(平均年龄64岁)患者接受了结肠镜检查,并接受了抗血栓治疗。在511例接受抗栓治疗的患者中,173例(33.86%)发生了结肠息肉切除后立即出血,而在4651例未接受抗栓治疗的患者中,439例(9.44%)发生了立即出血(p <;0.001)。另一方面,两组CSP后延迟出血发生率无显著差异(0.41% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.15)。然而,接受抗栓治疗的息肉切除术后迟发性出血的发生率明显高于未接受抗栓治疗的患者(511例中有7例[1.37%]对4651例中有12例[0.26%],p = 0.0016)。结论结肠镜切除结肠息肉后迟发性出血的风险较低,尽管持续进行抗栓治疗。www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02594813)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信