Quantifying Topographic Effects on Carbon and Water Fluxes Over Mountainous Areas

IF 3.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jianjie Cao, Rong Wang, Jing M. Chen, Mengmiao Yang, Zhiqiang Cheng, Guofang Miao
{"title":"Quantifying Topographic Effects on Carbon and Water Fluxes Over Mountainous Areas","authors":"Jianjie Cao,&nbsp;Rong Wang,&nbsp;Jing M. Chen,&nbsp;Mengmiao Yang,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Cheng,&nbsp;Guofang Miao","doi":"10.1029/2025JG008878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relative to flat surfaces, mountain terrains modify solar radiation absorbed by vegetation on sloping surfaces, causing changes in mass and energy fluxes, including gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). However, these changes are generally ignored in regional and global ecosystem models and their magnitudes have not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we first validated the Biosphere-atmosphere Exchange Process Simulator (BEPS) model against measured GPP and ET over mountainous sites, and then applied it to a mountainous region (Fujian Province, China). In BEPS, the topographic effects are systematically considered in the following steps: (1) the satellite-derived leaf area index (LAI) is projected to sloping surfaces, (2) canopy radiative transfer is modeled relative to the normal to the slope, and (3) the modeled fluxes are reprojected from sloping to horizontal surfaces. Step (1) decreases LAI as sloping surfaces are larger than the corresponding horizontal surfaces, but Step (3) increases fluxes in the opposite way. Because of the nonlinear relationships between fluxes and LAI, GPP and ET simulations without considering the topographic effects are always underestimated, especially on sunlit slopes. The underestimation increases with increasing slope, and for slopes greater than 40°, GPP is underestimated by 11% and ET by 33%, suggesting that existing global GPP and ET products could have been significantly underestimated in mountainous regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JG008878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative to flat surfaces, mountain terrains modify solar radiation absorbed by vegetation on sloping surfaces, causing changes in mass and energy fluxes, including gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). However, these changes are generally ignored in regional and global ecosystem models and their magnitudes have not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we first validated the Biosphere-atmosphere Exchange Process Simulator (BEPS) model against measured GPP and ET over mountainous sites, and then applied it to a mountainous region (Fujian Province, China). In BEPS, the topographic effects are systematically considered in the following steps: (1) the satellite-derived leaf area index (LAI) is projected to sloping surfaces, (2) canopy radiative transfer is modeled relative to the normal to the slope, and (3) the modeled fluxes are reprojected from sloping to horizontal surfaces. Step (1) decreases LAI as sloping surfaces are larger than the corresponding horizontal surfaces, but Step (3) increases fluxes in the opposite way. Because of the nonlinear relationships between fluxes and LAI, GPP and ET simulations without considering the topographic effects are always underestimated, especially on sunlit slopes. The underestimation increases with increasing slope, and for slopes greater than 40°, GPP is underestimated by 11% and ET by 33%, suggesting that existing global GPP and ET products could have been significantly underestimated in mountainous regions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

山区地形对碳和水通量的量化影响
相对于平面,山地地形改变了斜坡上植被吸收的太阳辐射,引起质量和能量通量的变化,包括总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散发(ET)。然而,这些变化在区域和全球生态系统模式中通常被忽略,其大小也没有得到系统的评估。在这项研究中,我们首先对生物圈-大气交换过程模拟器(BEPS)模型进行验证,并将其应用于山区(中国福建省)的GPP和ET测量。在BEPS中,地形效应在以下步骤中得到了系统的考虑:(1)将卫星反演的叶面积指数(LAI)投影到斜坡表面,(2)相对于斜坡的法线对冠层辐射传输进行建模,(3)将模拟的通量从斜坡重投影到水平表面。步骤(1)降低了LAI,因为坡度面大于相应的水平面,而步骤(3)增加了通量。由于通量与LAI之间的非线性关系,不考虑地形效应的GPP和ET模拟总是被低估,特别是在阳光照射的斜坡上。当坡度大于40°时,GPP被低估了11%,ET被低估了33%,这表明现有的全球GPP和ET产品在山区可能被严重低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信