Utility of indicator thresholds across spatial gradients for applications to ecosystem-based fisheries management

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70307
Shannon M. Hennessey, Jamison M. Gove, Mary K. Donovan
{"title":"Utility of indicator thresholds across spatial gradients for applications to ecosystem-based fisheries management","authors":"Shannon M. Hennessey,&nbsp;Jamison M. Gove,&nbsp;Mary K. Donovan","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) is increasingly recognized as an effective management strategy, especially in systems with dynamic components that have integrated responses to interacting drivers. Management targets therefore need to incorporate these complex dynamics, which may be accomplished by establishing targets based on the indicators. Here, we leverage existing data to evaluate the use of indicators in EBFM for nearshore ecosystems in Hawai‘i. We screened for potential nonlinearities in the spatial relationships between ecosystem indicators and environmental drivers over a 10-year period, and assessed commonalities in identified indicator–driver thresholds. To understand how the ecosystem indicators relate to commonly used metrics in single-species assessments, we also tested whether these relationships were consistent across species, species complexes, and functional groups. Gradient forests and generalized additive mixed models revealed detectable threshold relationships across five environmental drivers and six ecosystem indicators. Several indicators showed considerable overlap in threshold locations with common drivers, especially for rugosity (habitat complexity) and wave forcing. While some indicators comprising nested species, species complexes, and functional groups had comparable thresholds with a common driver, this was not always the case, highlighting the need for careful consideration when selecting indicators for management applications. We demonstrate the use of these thresholds in environmental drivers by evaluating them along a gradient of fish biomass. The use of multi-model inference to incorporate multiple statistical methods to define the relationship between an ecosystem indicator and driver offers a quantitative basis for ecosystem management. Our results here provide a rubric by which to test for the existence of thresholds in indicator–driver relationships across spatial gradients and additionally identify clear thresholds for which to consider when managing fisheries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) is increasingly recognized as an effective management strategy, especially in systems with dynamic components that have integrated responses to interacting drivers. Management targets therefore need to incorporate these complex dynamics, which may be accomplished by establishing targets based on the indicators. Here, we leverage existing data to evaluate the use of indicators in EBFM for nearshore ecosystems in Hawai‘i. We screened for potential nonlinearities in the spatial relationships between ecosystem indicators and environmental drivers over a 10-year period, and assessed commonalities in identified indicator–driver thresholds. To understand how the ecosystem indicators relate to commonly used metrics in single-species assessments, we also tested whether these relationships were consistent across species, species complexes, and functional groups. Gradient forests and generalized additive mixed models revealed detectable threshold relationships across five environmental drivers and six ecosystem indicators. Several indicators showed considerable overlap in threshold locations with common drivers, especially for rugosity (habitat complexity) and wave forcing. While some indicators comprising nested species, species complexes, and functional groups had comparable thresholds with a common driver, this was not always the case, highlighting the need for careful consideration when selecting indicators for management applications. We demonstrate the use of these thresholds in environmental drivers by evaluating them along a gradient of fish biomass. The use of multi-model inference to incorporate multiple statistical methods to define the relationship between an ecosystem indicator and driver offers a quantitative basis for ecosystem management. Our results here provide a rubric by which to test for the existence of thresholds in indicator–driver relationships across spatial gradients and additionally identify clear thresholds for which to consider when managing fisheries.

Abstract Image

跨空间梯度指标阈值在基于生态系统的渔业管理中的应用
基于生态系统的渔业管理(EBFM)越来越被认为是一种有效的管理策略,特别是在具有动态组成部分的系统中,这些系统对相互作用的驱动因素具有综合响应。因此,管理目标需要纳入这些复杂的动态,这可以通过根据指标建立目标来实现。在这里,我们利用现有数据来评估EBFM指标在夏威夷近岸生态系统中的使用情况。我们筛选了10年间生态系统指标和环境驱动因素之间潜在的非线性空间关系,并评估了确定的指标-驱动因素阈值的共性。为了了解生态系统指标与单物种评估中常用的指标之间的关系,我们还测试了这些关系在物种、物种复合体和功能群之间是否一致。梯度森林和广义加性混合模型揭示了5个环境驱动因素和6个生态系统指标之间可检测的阈值关系。一些指标显示,在具有共同驱动因素的阈值位置有相当大的重叠,特别是在粗糙度(生境复杂性)和波浪强迫方面。虽然包含嵌套物种、物种复合体和功能群的一些指标与共同驱动因素具有可比的阈值,但情况并非总是如此,这突出了在选择管理应用程序的指标时需要仔细考虑。我们通过沿着鱼类生物量的梯度评估这些阈值来证明这些阈值在环境驱动因素中的使用。利用多模型推理,结合多种统计方法来定义生态系统指标与驱动因素之间的关系,为生态系统管理提供了定量依据。我们在这里的结果提供了一个标准,通过该标准可以测试跨空间梯度的指标-驱动关系中阈值的存在性,并且还可以确定在管理渔业时要考虑的明确阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信