Comparative Analysis of Preferences and Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccine Among Individuals With and Without Chronic Diseases: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Afroza Begum, Md. Azhar Uddin, Syed M. Ahsan, Md. Ahsanul Islam
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Preferences and Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccine Among Individuals With and Without Chronic Diseases: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach","authors":"Afroza Begum,&nbsp;Md. Azhar Uddin,&nbsp;Syed M. Ahsan,&nbsp;Md. Ahsanul Islam","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in the global battle against the pandemic. However, vaccine acceptance remains a critical determinant of their effectiveness. While numerous studies have explored factors influencing vaccine acceptance, there is a notable dearth of research regarding preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) among individuals with chronic diseases (ChD) who are at heightened risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This study addresses this gap by investigating COVID-19 vaccine preferences and WTP among individuals with and without chronic diseases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Employing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach, we interviewed 843 participants to assess their preference for COVID-19 vaccine attributes such as origin, efficacy level, protection duration, and provider. We used a mixed logit model to analyze DCE data and estimated WTP by taking the negative ratio of preference and price parameters. Furthermore, we performed a stratified analysis according to the household head's ChD status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>As expected, vaccines with higher efficacy and longer protection are most preferred. Interestingly, our research shows a preference for European and American vaccines over Chinese vaccines. Additionally, this study reveals a preference for private facilities over government facilities for vaccinations among vaccine seekers. Patients with ChD exhibit higher WTP than those without such conditions, demonstrating the group's urgency in becoming vaccinated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Vaccine procurement and administration decisions by health authorities should be evidence-based and reflect public preferences regarding acceptance and WTP. Health authorities should prioritize both high efficacy and long-lasting protection in vaccine procurement, ensuring that neither is compromised. This approach addresses the top concerns of both groups—vaccine effectiveness for the ChD group and extended immunity for the NChD group. This study also informs policy decisions regarding vaccine origin and suggests incorporating private facilities as vaccine administration points to reduce pressure on government facilities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in the global battle against the pandemic. However, vaccine acceptance remains a critical determinant of their effectiveness. While numerous studies have explored factors influencing vaccine acceptance, there is a notable dearth of research regarding preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) among individuals with chronic diseases (ChD) who are at heightened risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This study addresses this gap by investigating COVID-19 vaccine preferences and WTP among individuals with and without chronic diseases.

Methods

Employing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach, we interviewed 843 participants to assess their preference for COVID-19 vaccine attributes such as origin, efficacy level, protection duration, and provider. We used a mixed logit model to analyze DCE data and estimated WTP by taking the negative ratio of preference and price parameters. Furthermore, we performed a stratified analysis according to the household head's ChD status.

Results

As expected, vaccines with higher efficacy and longer protection are most preferred. Interestingly, our research shows a preference for European and American vaccines over Chinese vaccines. Additionally, this study reveals a preference for private facilities over government facilities for vaccinations among vaccine seekers. Patients with ChD exhibit higher WTP than those without such conditions, demonstrating the group's urgency in becoming vaccinated.

Conclusion

Vaccine procurement and administration decisions by health authorities should be evidence-based and reflect public preferences regarding acceptance and WTP. Health authorities should prioritize both high efficacy and long-lasting protection in vaccine procurement, ensuring that neither is compromised. This approach addresses the top concerns of both groups—vaccine effectiveness for the ChD group and extended immunity for the NChD group. This study also informs policy decisions regarding vaccine origin and suggests incorporating private facilities as vaccine administration points to reduce pressure on government facilities.

Abstract Image

有和没有慢性疾病的个体对COVID-19疫苗的偏好和支付意愿的比较分析:离散选择实验方法
背景和目的快速开发和部署COVID-19疫苗在全球抗击疫情中发挥了关键作用。然而,疫苗的接受程度仍然是决定其有效性的关键因素。虽然有许多研究探讨了影响疫苗接受度的因素,但关于慢性疾病(ChD)患者的偏好和支付意愿(WTP)的研究明显缺乏,这些患者患COVID-19严重后果的风险较高。本研究通过调查患有和非慢性疾病的个体对COVID-19疫苗的偏好和WTP来解决这一差距。方法采用离散选择实验(DCE)方法,对843名参与者进行访谈,评估他们对COVID-19疫苗的来源、疗效水平、保护时间和提供者等属性的偏好。我们使用混合logit模型对DCE数据进行分析,并采用偏好与价格参数的负比来估计WTP。此外,我们还根据户主的冠心病状况进行了分层分析。结果正如预期的那样,人们更倾向于选择效力更高、保护时间更长的疫苗。有趣的是,我们的研究显示,欧洲和美国的疫苗比中国的疫苗更受欢迎。此外,这项研究表明,寻求疫苗的人更倾向于在私人设施接种疫苗,而不是在政府设施接种疫苗。冠心病患者的WTP高于无此类疾病的患者,这表明该组织迫切需要接种疫苗。结论卫生当局的疫苗采购和管理决策应以证据为基础,并反映公众对疫苗接受度和WTP的偏好。卫生当局应在疫苗采购中优先考虑高效和长效保护,确保两者都不受影响。这种方法解决了两组人最关心的问题——针对冠心病组的疫苗有效性和针对非冠心病组的扩展免疫。这项研究还为有关疫苗来源的政策决定提供信息,并建议将私营设施作为疫苗管理点,以减轻对政府设施的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信