Time Interval From Coronary Angiography to Bypass Surgery and Risk of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Farzane Mahboubian, Hamidreza Sanati, Erfan Kohansal, Zahra Shafii
{"title":"Time Interval From Coronary Angiography to Bypass Surgery and Risk of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Farzane Mahboubian,&nbsp;Hamidreza Sanati,&nbsp;Erfan Kohansal,&nbsp;Zahra Shafii","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The association of the time interval between coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) remains uncertain. We evaluated and compared the risk of developing AKI after CABG in two groups of patients with a time interval between coronary angiography and CABG of less than 7 days and more than 7 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 171 patients who needed to undergo CABG for the first time within 1 month after coronary angiography. Overall, 85 patients underwent operation within 7 days of angiography (Group A) and 86 within 7 days to 1 month after angiography (Group B). AKI was defined using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median preoperative biomarkers (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen) were similar between groups and did not significantly change postoperatively. The incidence of AKI was 5.8% (<i>n</i> = 10), with 4.7% (<i>n</i> = 8) in the Risk class and 1.2% (<i>n</i> = 2) in the Failure class per RIFLE. Despite a numerically higher AKI rate in Group A (8.2%) compared to Group B (3.5%), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Notably, patients who developed AKI had significantly lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction compared to those without AKI (40% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While a 7-day interval between angiography and CABG did not significantly impact AKI incidence, we observed a non-significant trend toward higher AKI rates with shorter intervals. Our limited sample size and low overall AKI incidence (5.8%) warrant larger studies to clarify this relationship, particularly in patients with reduced left ventricular function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

The association of the time interval between coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) remains uncertain. We evaluated and compared the risk of developing AKI after CABG in two groups of patients with a time interval between coronary angiography and CABG of less than 7 days and more than 7 days.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 171 patients who needed to undergo CABG for the first time within 1 month after coronary angiography. Overall, 85 patients underwent operation within 7 days of angiography (Group A) and 86 within 7 days to 1 month after angiography (Group B). AKI was defined using Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria.

Results

Median preoperative biomarkers (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen) were similar between groups and did not significantly change postoperatively. The incidence of AKI was 5.8% (n = 10), with 4.7% (n = 8) in the Risk class and 1.2% (n = 2) in the Failure class per RIFLE. Despite a numerically higher AKI rate in Group A (8.2%) compared to Group B (3.5%), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Notably, patients who developed AKI had significantly lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction compared to those without AKI (40% vs. 50%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

While a 7-day interval between angiography and CABG did not significantly impact AKI incidence, we observed a non-significant trend toward higher AKI rates with shorter intervals. Our limited sample size and low overall AKI incidence (5.8%) warrant larger studies to clarify this relationship, particularly in patients with reduced left ventricular function.

冠状动脉造影到搭桥手术的时间间隔和术后急性肾损伤的风险:一项横断面研究
背景和目的冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)之间的时间间隔与术后急性肾损伤(AKI)的关系尚不清楚。我们评估并比较了冠脉造影和冠脉搭桥间隔小于7天和大于7天的两组患者在冠脉搭桥后发生AKI的风险。方法对171例冠状动脉造影后1个月内首次行冠脉搭桥的患者进行横断面研究。总体而言,85例患者在血管造影后7天内手术(A组),86例患者在血管造影后7天至1个月内手术(B组)。AKI的定义采用风险、损伤、衰竭、肾功能丧失和终末期肾病(RIFLE)标准。结果两组患者术前中位生物标志物(血清肌酐、血尿素氮)差异无统计学意义,术后无显著差异。AKI的发生率为5.8% (n = 10),其中4.7% (n = 8)为风险级,1.2% (n = 2)为失败级。尽管数值上a组AKI发生率(8.2%)高于B组(3.5%),但这一差异没有达到统计学意义。值得注意的是,发生AKI的患者术前左室射血分数明显低于未发生AKI的患者(40% vs. 50%, p < 0.01)。结论:虽然血管造影和冠脉搭桥间隔7天对AKI发病率没有显著影响,但我们观察到间隔越短,AKI发病率升高的趋势不显著。我们有限的样本量和较低的AKI总发病率(5.8%)保证了更大规模的研究来阐明这种关系,特别是在左心室功能降低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信