Epidemiological Trends and Evolving Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Burn Patients: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Surveillance in Northern Iran

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mahsa Sadeghi, Mohammadreza Mobayen, Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi, Zahra Mehrdad, Mohammadamin Khajavi Gaskarei, Sina Kamrani Moghadam, Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie, Meysam Hasannejad-Bibalan
{"title":"Epidemiological Trends and Evolving Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Burn Patients: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Surveillance in Northern Iran","authors":"Mahsa Sadeghi,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Mobayen,&nbsp;Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi,&nbsp;Zahra Mehrdad,&nbsp;Mohammadamin Khajavi Gaskarei,&nbsp;Sina Kamrani Moghadam,&nbsp;Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie,&nbsp;Meysam Hasannejad-Bibalan","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p><i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>P. aeruginosa</i>) is a major cause of burn wound infections, posing a significant challenge due to its increasing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> isolates from burn patients admitted to a referral burn center in Northern Iran over 3 years (March 2018–March 2021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 535 samples collected from burn patients. <i>P. aeruginosa</i> isolates were identified using standard microbiological methods and tested for susceptibility to various antibiotics through the disc diffusion method. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics to assess the prevalence and resistance patterns of the isolates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><i>P. aeruginosa</i> accounted for 36.1% (193/535) of bacterial isolates. The annual prevalence of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> varied from 19.6% to 44.4%, with the highest frequency observed among patients with 26%–50% total body surface area burns. Skin and soft tissue infections were the most common source (75.1%), followed by bloodstream infections (15%). Notably, 62.7% of isolates originated from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. High resistance was observed against ceftazidime (80%), ciprofloxacin (77.2%), imipenem (76.6%), and meropenem (76.1%). Conversely, amikacin (78.2%) and gentamicin (45%) exhibited the highest susceptibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicate a high prevalence of <i>Pseudomonas</i> with DTR, highlighting the need for stricter antibiotic stewardship and alternative treatment options. While amikacin showed higher susceptibility in our study, the recent CLSI 2023 guidelines suggest its use should be limited to urine isolates. In light of these updated recommendations, the use of aminoglycosides in treating <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections requires cautious evaluation. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to generalize these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is a major cause of burn wound infections, posing a significant challenge due to its increasing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa isolates from burn patients admitted to a referral burn center in Northern Iran over 3 years (March 2018–March 2021).

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 535 samples collected from burn patients. P. aeruginosa isolates were identified using standard microbiological methods and tested for susceptibility to various antibiotics through the disc diffusion method. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics to assess the prevalence and resistance patterns of the isolates.

Results

P. aeruginosa accounted for 36.1% (193/535) of bacterial isolates. The annual prevalence of P. aeruginosa varied from 19.6% to 44.4%, with the highest frequency observed among patients with 26%–50% total body surface area burns. Skin and soft tissue infections were the most common source (75.1%), followed by bloodstream infections (15%). Notably, 62.7% of isolates originated from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. High resistance was observed against ceftazidime (80%), ciprofloxacin (77.2%), imipenem (76.6%), and meropenem (76.1%). Conversely, amikacin (78.2%) and gentamicin (45%) exhibited the highest susceptibility.

Conclusion

The findings indicate a high prevalence of Pseudomonas with DTR, highlighting the need for stricter antibiotic stewardship and alternative treatment options. While amikacin showed higher susceptibility in our study, the recent CLSI 2023 guidelines suggest its use should be limited to urine isolates. In light of these updated recommendations, the use of aminoglycosides in treating P. aeruginosa infections requires cautious evaluation. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to generalize these findings.

伊朗北部烧伤患者铜绿假单胞菌的流行病学趋势和不断变化的抗生素耐药性:一项为期3年的横断面监测
背景和目的铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)是烧伤创面感染的主要原因,由于其日益增加的抗生素耐药性而带来了重大挑战。本研究评估了3年来(2018年3月至2021年3月)伊朗北部一家转诊烧伤中心收治的烧伤患者中铜绿假单胞菌的流行率和抗生素耐药性模式。方法对535例烧伤患者进行回顾性横断面研究。采用标准微生物学方法对铜绿假单胞菌进行鉴定,并采用圆盘扩散法对不同抗生素进行药敏试验。数据分析涉及描述性统计,以评估分离株的流行率和耐药模式。结果铜绿假单胞菌占36.1%(193/535)。铜绿假单胞菌的年患病率从19.6%到44.4%不等,在全身面积烧伤26%-50%的患者中发病率最高。皮肤和软组织感染是最常见的来源(75.1%),其次是血液感染(15%)。值得注意的是,62.7%的分离株来自重症监护病房(ICU)患者。头孢他啶(80%)、环丙沙星(77.2%)、亚胺培南(76.6%)、美罗培南(76.1%)耐药。相反,阿米卡星(78.2%)和庆大霉素(45%)的易感性最高。结论DTR假单胞菌的流行率较高,需要更严格的抗生素管理和替代治疗方案。虽然阿米卡星在我们的研究中显示出更高的敏感性,但最近的CLSI 2023指南建议,阿米卡星的使用应仅限于尿液分离物。鉴于这些最新的建议,氨基糖苷类药物在治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染方面的使用需要谨慎评估。进一步的多中心研究和更大的样本量有必要推广这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信