Balancing ethics and conservation: Assessing short-term behavioral impacts of biopsy sampling in a recovering whale population

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Leena Riekkola, Simon Childerhouse, Rochelle Constantine, Ros Cole, Robert Harcourt, Dorothea Heimeier, Dave Lundquist, Catherine Meyer, Mike Ogle, Debbie Steel, Esther Stuck, Aimee van der Reis, Emma L. Carroll
{"title":"Balancing ethics and conservation: Assessing short-term behavioral impacts of biopsy sampling in a recovering whale population","authors":"Leena Riekkola,&nbsp;Simon Childerhouse,&nbsp;Rochelle Constantine,&nbsp;Ros Cole,&nbsp;Robert Harcourt,&nbsp;Dorothea Heimeier,&nbsp;Dave Lundquist,&nbsp;Catherine Meyer,&nbsp;Mike Ogle,&nbsp;Debbie Steel,&nbsp;Esther Stuck,&nbsp;Aimee van der Reis,&nbsp;Emma L. Carroll","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-term monitoring programs based on individual identification have provided a sound basis for monitoring the status of endangered and recovering species. However, the impact of such research needs to be understood relative to the benefit gained. Here, we present a case study of a population that has been studied using genetic monitoring since 1995, the New Zealand southern right whale (<i>Eubalaena australis;</i> tohorā). Tissue samples for genetic monitoring were collected using a remote biopsy system, an approach used widely in marine mammal research. Under most ethical frameworks, this is considered a minor impact of short duration, but perceived or potential impact limits sampling of some demographic classes (e.g., calves). We used data collected during surveys from 2020 to 2022 to measure short-term behavioral impact of biopsy sample collection, with 748 responses collected over 52 days in the field from 524 individual whales. Biopsy sampling was overwhelmingly of minimal impact: the majority (90%) of biopsy responses were classified as either ‘no response’ (46%, <i>n</i> = 341) or ‘weak response’ (44%, <i>n</i> = 326). This study also supports previous work that calves do not show a greater reaction to biopsy sampling than adults. The behavior of the whales prior to being approached for biopsy sampling significantly affected the response elicited, but there was no measurable cumulative impact of multiple sampling, based on within-year (<i>n</i> = 113) or between-year (<i>n</i> = 21) comparisons. Genetic data from this monitoring project has been used to revise the conservation status of the population, to demonstrate the effectiveness of conservation polices and to understand circumpolar stock structure. Overall, this study confirms that biopsy sampling is a minimally invasive, data-rich collection method that provides a wealth of information for conservation and management of whales. It typically causes only a minor, short-term behavioral disturbance with wounds that, based on other studies, heal quickly and without discernible adverse health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term monitoring programs based on individual identification have provided a sound basis for monitoring the status of endangered and recovering species. However, the impact of such research needs to be understood relative to the benefit gained. Here, we present a case study of a population that has been studied using genetic monitoring since 1995, the New Zealand southern right whale (Eubalaena australis; tohorā). Tissue samples for genetic monitoring were collected using a remote biopsy system, an approach used widely in marine mammal research. Under most ethical frameworks, this is considered a minor impact of short duration, but perceived or potential impact limits sampling of some demographic classes (e.g., calves). We used data collected during surveys from 2020 to 2022 to measure short-term behavioral impact of biopsy sample collection, with 748 responses collected over 52 days in the field from 524 individual whales. Biopsy sampling was overwhelmingly of minimal impact: the majority (90%) of biopsy responses were classified as either ‘no response’ (46%, n = 341) or ‘weak response’ (44%, n = 326). This study also supports previous work that calves do not show a greater reaction to biopsy sampling than adults. The behavior of the whales prior to being approached for biopsy sampling significantly affected the response elicited, but there was no measurable cumulative impact of multiple sampling, based on within-year (n = 113) or between-year (n = 21) comparisons. Genetic data from this monitoring project has been used to revise the conservation status of the population, to demonstrate the effectiveness of conservation polices and to understand circumpolar stock structure. Overall, this study confirms that biopsy sampling is a minimally invasive, data-rich collection method that provides a wealth of information for conservation and management of whales. It typically causes only a minor, short-term behavioral disturbance with wounds that, based on other studies, heal quickly and without discernible adverse health effects.

Abstract Image

平衡伦理和保护:评估活组织取样对恢复鲸鱼种群的短期行为影响
基于个体鉴定的长期监测计划为监测濒危物种和恢复物种的状况提供了良好的基础。然而,这种研究的影响需要相对于所获得的利益来理解。在这里,我们提出了一个种群的案例研究,该种群自1995年以来一直使用遗传监测进行研究,新西兰南露脊鲸(Eubalaena australis;tohorā)。用于遗传监测的组织样本使用远程活检系统收集,这是一种在海洋哺乳动物研究中广泛使用的方法。在大多数道德框架下,这被认为是短期的轻微影响,但感知或潜在的影响限制了某些人口统计学类别(例如小牛)的抽样。我们使用2020年至2022年调查期间收集的数据来测量活检样本收集的短期行为影响,在52天内从524只鲸鱼中收集了748份回复。活检取样的影响微乎其微:大多数(90%)活检反应被归类为“无反应”(46%,n = 341)或“弱反应”(44%,n = 326)。这项研究也支持了先前的研究,即小牛对活检取样的反应并不比成人大。在进行活检取样之前,鲸鱼的行为显著影响了所引起的反应,但基于年内(n = 113)或年内(n = 21)比较,多次取样没有可测量的累积影响。该监测项目的遗传数据已用于修订种群的保护状况,证明保护政策的有效性,并了解环极地种群结构。总的来说,这项研究证实了活检取样是一种微创的、数据丰富的收集方法,为鲸鱼的保护和管理提供了丰富的信息。根据其他研究,它通常只会引起轻微的、短期的行为障碍,而且伤口愈合得很快,没有明显的不良健康影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信