Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mixed-Age Studies.

IF 3.8
Isabel A Yoon, Caili Ren, Vanessa M Pazdernik, John Li, Sandeep R Pagali, Simon Kung, Annie M Waniger, Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Maria I Lapid
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mixed-Age Studies.","authors":"Isabel A Yoon, Caili Ren, Vanessa M Pazdernik, John Li, Sandeep R Pagali, Simon Kung, Annie M Waniger, Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Maria I Lapid","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Geriatric depression is a significant public health burden and is challenging to treat. The current study aimed to examine the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a nonpharmacologic intervention approach for depression in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of 24 studies across 13 countries including a total of 1,277 participants. Excluding six studies with incomplete data, we performed a metaanalysis of 18 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 912 patients (502 active tDCS, 410 sham control tDCS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed a large effect size favouring active tDCS for depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.96, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.37), though with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). Large effect sizes favouring active tDCS were demonstrated in clinician-administered depression measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS], Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [CSDD]) as well as in self-report measures (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS]). Subgroup analyses showed a nonsignificant effect in studies focused solely on major depressive disorder (MDD) and a large, though preliminary, effect in studies limited to adults aged 65 and older.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that tDCS may be a promising nonpharmacological treatment option for depression in older adults, particularly in the context of comorbid conditions. However, further high-quality research specifically targeting this population is needed to validate its efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":520785,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1077-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2025.06.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Geriatric depression is a significant public health burden and is challenging to treat. The current study aimed to examine the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a nonpharmacologic intervention approach for depression in older adults.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of 24 studies across 13 countries including a total of 1,277 participants. Excluding six studies with incomplete data, we performed a metaanalysis of 18 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 912 patients (502 active tDCS, 410 sham control tDCS).

Results: Results revealed a large effect size favouring active tDCS for depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.96, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.37), though with high heterogeneity (I2 = 89%). Large effect sizes favouring active tDCS were demonstrated in clinician-administered depression measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS], Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [CSDD]) as well as in self-report measures (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI], Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS]). Subgroup analyses showed a nonsignificant effect in studies focused solely on major depressive disorder (MDD) and a large, though preliminary, effect in studies limited to adults aged 65 and older.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that tDCS may be a promising nonpharmacological treatment option for depression in older adults, particularly in the context of comorbid conditions. However, further high-quality research specifically targeting this population is needed to validate its efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.

经颅直流电刺激治疗老年人抑郁症的有效性和安全性:一项混合年龄研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:老年抑郁症是一个重大的公共卫生负担,具有挑战性的治疗。目前的研究旨在检验经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为一种非药物干预方法治疗老年人抑郁症的有效性。方法:我们对13个国家的24项研究进行了系统回顾,包括1277名参与者。排除6项数据不完整的研究,我们对18项随机临床试验(rct)进行了荟萃分析,涉及912例患者(502例活动tDCS, 410例假对照tDCS)。结果:结果显示,尽管存在高度异质性(I2 = 89%),但积极的tDCS治疗抑郁症状的效应量较大(SMD = -0.96, 95% CI -1.56至-0.37)。在临床应用的抑郁量表(Hamilton抑郁评定量表[HDRS]、Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表[MADRS]、Cornell痴呆抑郁量表[CSDD])以及自我报告量表(Beck抑郁量表[BDI]、Zung抑郁自评量表[SDS])中,均证实了支持活跃tDCS的大效应量。亚组分析显示,在仅关注重度抑郁症(MDD)的研究中,效果不显著,而在仅限于65岁及以上成年人的研究中,效果很大,尽管是初步的。结论:这些发现表明,tDCS可能是老年人抑郁症的一种有希望的非药物治疗选择,特别是在合并症的情况下。然而,需要进一步针对这一人群的高质量研究来验证其疗效并优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书