The Effect of Sinus Elevation and Onlay Grafts on Biological and Technical Complications of Implants Placed in the Resorbed Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Studies.

IF 1.7
Virat Hansrani, Jeenarak Duangsuwan, Megha Shah, Zeinab El Amami, Ali Abdallah, Thaleia Filokyprou, Dimitra Vasilaki, Konstantinos Michalakis
{"title":"The Effect of Sinus Elevation and Onlay Grafts on Biological and Technical Complications of Implants Placed in the Resorbed Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Studies.","authors":"Virat Hansrani, Jeenarak Duangsuwan, Megha Shah, Zeinab El Amami, Ali Abdallah, Thaleia Filokyprou, Dimitra Vasilaki, Konstantinos Michalakis","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the biological and technical complications associated with sinus elevation versus onlay graft procedures in the posterior resorbed maxilla prior to implant placement. By analyzing existing literature, this review aimed to assess how these two techniques influence implant success and complication rates in the posterior maxilla.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic search from January 2000 to December 2023 was performed in four databases following PRISMA guidelines with a focused PICO question. The quality of the reports was established using a modified Cochrane Collaboration tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1199 studies, 20 articles were selected, including 16 on sinus augmentation (SA) and 4 on both sinus augmentation and onlay grafts (SAOG). The studies involved 1245 patients, with 81.8% receiving SA and 18.1% receiving SAOG. Implant survival rates ranged from 80.25% to 100%, with an overall success rate of 91.5-100%. Complications included biological issues (e.g., membrane perforation) and mechanical issues (e.g., graft loss). The average follow-up period was 60 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited evidence exists on implant outcomes following sinus augmentation versus onlay grafting in the atrophied maxilla. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to compare these techniques, emphasizing prosthetically driven augmentation for optimal implant positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the biological and technical complications associated with sinus elevation versus onlay graft procedures in the posterior resorbed maxilla prior to implant placement. By analyzing existing literature, this review aimed to assess how these two techniques influence implant success and complication rates in the posterior maxilla.

Materials and methods: An electronic search from January 2000 to December 2023 was performed in four databases following PRISMA guidelines with a focused PICO question. The quality of the reports was established using a modified Cochrane Collaboration tool.

Results: Out of 1199 studies, 20 articles were selected, including 16 on sinus augmentation (SA) and 4 on both sinus augmentation and onlay grafts (SAOG). The studies involved 1245 patients, with 81.8% receiving SA and 18.1% receiving SAOG. Implant survival rates ranged from 80.25% to 100%, with an overall success rate of 91.5-100%. Complications included biological issues (e.g., membrane perforation) and mechanical issues (e.g., graft loss). The average follow-up period was 60 months.

Conclusions: Limited evidence exists on implant outcomes following sinus augmentation versus onlay grafting in the atrophied maxilla. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to compare these techniques, emphasizing prosthetically driven augmentation for optimal implant positioning.

上颌后吸收种植体放置的生物和技术并发症的影响:系统回顾和研究分析。
目的:评估在种植体植入前在后吸收上颌骨进行窦抬高与嵌板移植手术相关的生物学和技术并发症。通过对现有文献的分析,本综述旨在评估这两种技术对后上颌种植成功率和并发症发生率的影响。材料和方法:从2000年1月到2023年12月,按照PRISMA指南在四个数据库中进行了电子检索,重点是PICO问题。使用改进的Cochrane协作工具来确定报告的质量。结果:在1199篇研究中,选择了20篇文章,其中16篇是关于鼻窦增强术(SA)的,4篇是关于鼻窦增强术和附着移植物(SAOG)的。研究涉及1245例患者,其中81.8%接受SA, 18.1%接受SAOG。种植体成活率为80.25% ~ 100%,总成功率为91.5 ~ 100%。并发症包括生物学问题(如膜穿孔)和机械问题(如移植物丢失)。平均随访期为60个月。结论:在萎缩的上颌骨中,鼻窦增强术与嵌盖移植术对种植效果的影响有限。需要进一步的随机对照试验(rct)来比较这些技术,强调假体驱动的增强以获得最佳的种植体定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信