Dynamic Changes of 3D Bending Angle Through the Cardiac Cycle: Implications With Bioresorbable Scaffold Performance.

Simone Fezzi, Jiayue Huang, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Daixin Ding, Alessandro Sarai, Domenico Tavella, Gabriele Pesarini, Roberto Scarsini, William Wijns, Shengxian Tu, Flavio Luciano Ribichini
{"title":"Dynamic Changes of 3D Bending Angle Through the Cardiac Cycle: Implications With Bioresorbable Scaffold Performance.","authors":"Simone Fezzi, Jiayue Huang, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Daixin Ding, Alessandro Sarai, Domenico Tavella, Gabriele Pesarini, Roberto Scarsini, William Wijns, Shengxian Tu, Flavio Luciano Ribichini","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several predictors of adverse events following bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been identified. The role of vessel biomechanical properties remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe the biomechanical properties of coronary arteries after BRS implantation by assessing the maximum bending angle (BAmax) changes through the cardiac cycle and their interaction with long-term incidence of target-vessel failure (TVF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional BAmax was computed at end-diastole and end-systole, before and after BRS implantation. Cardiac motion-induced angulation change (ΔcBAmax) was calculated as the absolute difference between end-systole and end-diastole, and scaffold-induced angulation changes as the absolute difference between pre- and postimplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BAmax computation was available in 164 coronary vessels at baseline and in 88 at long-term follow-up (57 [42-66] months). Following BRS implantation, BAmax decreased both in diastole (-6.2°) and in systole (-9.0°). TVF-related vessels showed higher pre-PCI BAmax at end-diastole, at end-systole, and higher ΔcBAmax (11.4° [6.0°-22.9°] vs 5.8° [2.7°-12.4°]; P = 0.002), whereas no significant difference in post-PCI BAmax was present. Scaffold-induced BAmax change was significantly higher in vessels with TVF compared with TVF-free ones, both at end-diastole, end-systole, and in the ΔcBAmax group (10.1° [4.4°-20.6°] vs 5.7° [2.3°-10.9°]; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified scaffold-induced change in ΔcBAmax as an independent predictor of TVF (for 10° increase: aHR 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11-2.45; P = 0.01). After BRS resorption, coronary artery BAmax increased, restoring baseline biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BA changes through the cardiac cycle decrease after PCI with BRS; the greater the decrease, the higher the risk of target vessel failure at follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several predictors of adverse events following bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been identified. The role of vessel biomechanical properties remains underexplored.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the biomechanical properties of coronary arteries after BRS implantation by assessing the maximum bending angle (BAmax) changes through the cardiac cycle and their interaction with long-term incidence of target-vessel failure (TVF).

Methods: Three-dimensional BAmax was computed at end-diastole and end-systole, before and after BRS implantation. Cardiac motion-induced angulation change (ΔcBAmax) was calculated as the absolute difference between end-systole and end-diastole, and scaffold-induced angulation changes as the absolute difference between pre- and postimplantation.

Results: BAmax computation was available in 164 coronary vessels at baseline and in 88 at long-term follow-up (57 [42-66] months). Following BRS implantation, BAmax decreased both in diastole (-6.2°) and in systole (-9.0°). TVF-related vessels showed higher pre-PCI BAmax at end-diastole, at end-systole, and higher ΔcBAmax (11.4° [6.0°-22.9°] vs 5.8° [2.7°-12.4°]; P = 0.002), whereas no significant difference in post-PCI BAmax was present. Scaffold-induced BAmax change was significantly higher in vessels with TVF compared with TVF-free ones, both at end-diastole, end-systole, and in the ΔcBAmax group (10.1° [4.4°-20.6°] vs 5.7° [2.3°-10.9°]; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified scaffold-induced change in ΔcBAmax as an independent predictor of TVF (for 10° increase: aHR 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11-2.45; P = 0.01). After BRS resorption, coronary artery BAmax increased, restoring baseline biomechanics.

Conclusions: BA changes through the cardiac cycle decrease after PCI with BRS; the greater the decrease, the higher the risk of target vessel failure at follow-up.

心脏周期内三维弯曲角度的动态变化:与生物可吸收支架性能的关系。
背景:生物可吸收支架(BRS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良事件的几个预测因素已经确定。血管生物力学特性的作用仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究旨在通过评估心脏周期内冠状动脉最大弯曲角(BAmax)的变化及其与靶血管衰竭(TVF)长期发生率的相互作用,描述BRS植入后冠状动脉的生物力学特性。方法:在BRS植入前后舒张末和收缩期分别计算三维BAmax。心脏运动诱导的成角变化(ΔcBAmax)计算为收缩期末和舒张期末的绝对差异,支架诱导的成角变化计算为植入前后的绝对差异。结果:基线时164条冠状血管和长期随访(57[42-66]个月)时88条冠状血管可进行BAmax计算。BRS植入后,舒张期(-6.2°)和收缩期(-9.0°)BAmax均下降。tvf相关血管舒张末期和收缩期终末pci前BAmax较高,ΔcBAmax较高(11.4°[6.0°-22.9°]vs 5.8°[2.7°-12.4°];P = 0.002),而pci后BAmax无显著差异。支架诱导的BAmax变化在有TVF的血管中明显高于无TVF的血管,无论是在舒张末期、收缩期末期,还是在ΔcBAmax组(10.1°[4.4°-20.6°]vs 5.7°[2.3°-10.9°];P = 0.001)。多变量分析发现支架诱导的ΔcBAmax变化是TVF的独立预测因子(升高10°:aHR 1.65;95% ci: 1.11-2.45;P = 0.01)。BRS吸收后,冠状动脉BAmax增加,恢复基线生物力学。结论:PCI合并BRS后BA随心周期降低而变化;降低幅度越大,随访时靶血管衰竭的风险越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Asia
JACC. Asia Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信