Diagnostic efficacy of large language models in the pediatric emergency department: a pilot study.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1624786
Francesco Del Monte, Roberta Barolo, Maria Circhetta, Angelo Giovanni Delmonaco, Emanuele Castagno, Emanuele Pivetta, Letizia Bergamasco, Matteo Franco, Gabriella Olmo, Claudia Bondone
{"title":"Diagnostic efficacy of large language models in the pediatric emergency department: a pilot study.","authors":"Francesco Del Monte, Roberta Barolo, Maria Circhetta, Angelo Giovanni Delmonaco, Emanuele Castagno, Emanuele Pivetta, Letizia Bergamasco, Matteo Franco, Gabriella Olmo, Claudia Bondone","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1624786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) faces significant challenges, such as high patient volumes, time-sensitive decisions, and complex diagnoses. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance patient care; however, their effectiveness in supporting the diagnostic process remains uncertain, with studies showing mixed results regarding their impact on clinical reasoning. We aimed to assess LLM-based chatbots performance in realistic PED scenarios, and to explore their use as diagnosis-making assistants in pediatric emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of 5 LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash, Llama-3-8B, and ChatGPT-4o mini) compared to 23 physicians (including 10 PED physicians, 6 PED residents, and 7 Emergency Medicine residents). Both LLMs and physicians had to provide one primary diagnosis and two differential diagnoses for 80 real-practice pediatric clinical cases from the PED of a tertiary care Children's Hospital, with three different levels of diagnostic complexity. The responses from both LLMs and physicians were compared to the final diagnoses assigned upon patient discharge; two independent experts evaluated the answers using a five-level accuracy scale. Each physician or LLM received a total score out of 80, based on the sum of all answer points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing chatbots were ChatGPT-4o (score: 72.5) and Gemini 1.5 Pro (score: 62.75), the first performing better (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than PED physicians (score: 61.88). Emergency Medicine residents performed worse (score: 43.75) than both the other physicians and chatbots (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Chatbots' performance was inversely proportional to case difficulty, but ChatGPT-4o managed to match the majority of the correct answers even for highly difficult cases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro could be a valid tool for ED physicians, supporting clinical decision-making without replacing the physician's judgment. Shared protocols for effective collaboration between AI chatbots and healthcare professionals are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1624786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1624786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) faces significant challenges, such as high patient volumes, time-sensitive decisions, and complex diagnoses. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance patient care; however, their effectiveness in supporting the diagnostic process remains uncertain, with studies showing mixed results regarding their impact on clinical reasoning. We aimed to assess LLM-based chatbots performance in realistic PED scenarios, and to explore their use as diagnosis-making assistants in pediatric emergency.

Methods: We evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of 5 LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash, Llama-3-8B, and ChatGPT-4o mini) compared to 23 physicians (including 10 PED physicians, 6 PED residents, and 7 Emergency Medicine residents). Both LLMs and physicians had to provide one primary diagnosis and two differential diagnoses for 80 real-practice pediatric clinical cases from the PED of a tertiary care Children's Hospital, with three different levels of diagnostic complexity. The responses from both LLMs and physicians were compared to the final diagnoses assigned upon patient discharge; two independent experts evaluated the answers using a five-level accuracy scale. Each physician or LLM received a total score out of 80, based on the sum of all answer points.

Results: The best performing chatbots were ChatGPT-4o (score: 72.5) and Gemini 1.5 Pro (score: 62.75), the first performing better (p < 0.05) than PED physicians (score: 61.88). Emergency Medicine residents performed worse (score: 43.75) than both the other physicians and chatbots (p < 0.01). Chatbots' performance was inversely proportional to case difficulty, but ChatGPT-4o managed to match the majority of the correct answers even for highly difficult cases.

Discussion: ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro could be a valid tool for ED physicians, supporting clinical decision-making without replacing the physician's judgment. Shared protocols for effective collaboration between AI chatbots and healthcare professionals are needed.

大型语言模型在儿科急诊科的诊断效果:一项试点研究。
背景:儿科急诊科(PED)面临着巨大的挑战,如高病人量,时间敏感的决策,和复杂的诊断。大型语言模型(LLMs)具有增强患者护理的潜力;然而,它们在支持诊断过程中的有效性仍然不确定,研究显示它们对临床推理的影响结果不一。我们的目的是评估基于llm的聊天机器人在现实PED场景中的表现,并探索它们在儿科急诊中作为诊断制定助手的用途。方法:我们评估了5名LLMs (chatgpt - 40、Gemini 1.5 Pro、Gemini 1.5 Flash、lama-3- 8b和chatgpt - 40 mini)与23名医生(包括10名PED医生、6名PED住院医生和7名急诊医学住院医生)的诊断效果。llm和医生必须为80例来自三级儿童医院PED的实际儿科临床病例提供一个初步诊断和两个鉴别诊断,诊断复杂性有三个不同的级别。将法学硕士和医生的回答与患者出院时的最终诊断进行比较;两位独立专家使用五级准确度量表对答案进行评估。根据所有答案的总和,每位医生或法学硕士的总分为80分。结果:表现最好的聊天机器人是chatgpt - 40(得分:72.5)和Gemini 1.5 Pro(得分:62.75),第一个表现更好(p p)讨论:chatgpt - 40和Gemini 1.5 Pro可以成为ED医生的有效工具,支持临床决策,而不取代医生的判断。需要在人工智能聊天机器人和医疗保健专业人员之间进行有效协作的共享协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信