Apnea testing for brain death confirmation in VV-ECMO patients with very low sweep flow: a case reports and practical physiological insights.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250373
Carine Carrijo de Faria, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Luis Carlos Cardoso Maia Junior, Gabriel Afonso Dutra Kreling, Marcelo Park
{"title":"Apnea testing for brain death confirmation in VV-ECMO patients with very low sweep flow: a case reports and practical physiological insights.","authors":"Carine Carrijo de Faria, Pedro Vitale Mendes, Luis Carlos Cardoso Maia Junior, Gabriel Afonso Dutra Kreling, Marcelo Park","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a critical therapeutic tool for patients with severe respiratory failure. Neurological complications, including brain death, are common in this population, and confirming brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients presents unique challenges. In Brazil, an apnea test is mandatory for confirming brain death. However, its application in patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which predominantly addresses venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases, is not well defined in the literature. This report outlines our standardized approach for conducting apnea tests in three patients with suspected brain death during ongoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We describe three cases from a cohort of 93 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients treated for severe respiratory failure. The apnea test was conducted after 24 hours of observation without sedation. Given the physiological nuances of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, where carbon dioxide clearance is primarily influenced by sweep flow, we adopted a low-sweep-flow protocol (200mL/minute) to achieve a partial pressure of carbon dioxide greater than 55mmHg, consistent with brain death criteria. In cases of severe hypoxemia during the test, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow can be temporarily increased to maintain oxygenation. All patients received concurrent renal support, which also facilitated carbon dioxide clearance. Our findings suggest that the apnea test with very low sweep flow is a safe and feasible method for diagnosing brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients. This physiologically grounded approach provides a clinically viable strategy for managing the complex interplay between gas exchange, oxygenation, and carbon dioxide clearance during the apnea test.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a critical therapeutic tool for patients with severe respiratory failure. Neurological complications, including brain death, are common in this population, and confirming brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients presents unique challenges. In Brazil, an apnea test is mandatory for confirming brain death. However, its application in patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which predominantly addresses venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases, is not well defined in the literature. This report outlines our standardized approach for conducting apnea tests in three patients with suspected brain death during ongoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We describe three cases from a cohort of 93 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients treated for severe respiratory failure. The apnea test was conducted after 24 hours of observation without sedation. Given the physiological nuances of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, where carbon dioxide clearance is primarily influenced by sweep flow, we adopted a low-sweep-flow protocol (200mL/minute) to achieve a partial pressure of carbon dioxide greater than 55mmHg, consistent with brain death criteria. In cases of severe hypoxemia during the test, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow can be temporarily increased to maintain oxygenation. All patients received concurrent renal support, which also facilitated carbon dioxide clearance. Our findings suggest that the apnea test with very low sweep flow is a safe and feasible method for diagnosing brain death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported patients. This physiologically grounded approach provides a clinically viable strategy for managing the complex interplay between gas exchange, oxygenation, and carbon dioxide clearance during the apnea test.

VV-ECMO极低扫描流患者脑死亡确认的呼吸暂停测试:1例报告和实用生理学见解。
近年来,静脉-静脉体外膜氧合已成为严重呼吸衰竭患者的重要治疗手段。神经系统并发症,包括脑死亡,在这一人群中很常见,确认静脉静脉体外膜氧支持患者的脑死亡提出了独特的挑战。在巴西,确认脑死亡必须进行呼吸暂停测试。然而,它在静脉-静脉体外膜氧合患者中的应用,主要是针对静脉-动脉体外膜氧合病例,在文献中没有很好的定义。本报告概述了我们在进行静脉-静脉体外膜氧合支持期间对三名疑似脑死亡患者进行呼吸暂停测试的标准化方法。我们描述了93例体外膜氧合治疗严重呼吸衰竭的患者中的3例。在不镇静的情况下观察24小时后进行呼吸暂停试验。考虑到体外膜氧合的生理差异,其中二氧化碳清除主要受扫描流量的影响,我们采用了低扫描流量方案(200mL/分钟)来实现大于55mmHg的二氧化碳分压,符合脑死亡标准。在试验期间严重低氧血症的情况下,可暂时增加体外膜氧合血流量以维持氧合。所有患者同时接受肾脏支持,这也促进了二氧化碳的清除。我们的研究结果表明,极低扫描流量的呼吸暂停试验是诊断静脉静脉体外膜氧支持患者脑死亡的一种安全可行的方法。这种基于生理学的方法为管理呼吸暂停测试中气体交换、氧合和二氧化碳清除之间复杂的相互作用提供了一种临床可行的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信