{"title":"Assessment of remote digital auscultation for identifying significant aortic stenosis: A pilot study.","authors":"Yuval Avidan, Vsevolod Tabachnikov, Amir Aker","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.06.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. Technological advances, such as the TytoCare™ device, have introduced remote telemedicine-based cardiac auscultation. Its utility in diagnosing and grading AS remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the TytoCare™ for assessing AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were classified by standard echocardiogram into three groups: significant AS (at least moderate AS; n=20), non-significant AS (aortic sclerosis or mild AS; n=20) and controls (n=20). Heart sounds were self-recorded using the TytoCare™ stethoscope. Fifteen blinded physicians - five each from primary care, internal medicine and cardiology - reviewed the recordings using standardized equipment and assigned diagnoses based on a categorical scale: 0=insufficient data, 1=normal, 2=mild AS and 3=at least moderate AS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, with a mean±standard deviation age of 72.6±9.1years. The correct response rate for significant AS was 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 80-88%), with both cardiologists and non-cardiologists achieving≥80%. In contrast, performance declined in non-significant AS (57%, 95% CI: 51-62%), but remained high in the control group (87%, 95% CI: 82-90%). Cardiologists outperformed other physicians, overall (P=0.029) and in significant AS cases (P=0.022), while no significant differences were found among non-cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TytoCare™ demonstrated high reliability in the remote assessment of significant AS by both cardiologists and non-cardiologists. Its intuitive and user-friendly design enables self-application, even among older populations, emphasizing its potential as an effective screening tool for AS across diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2025.06.072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. Technological advances, such as the TytoCare™ device, have introduced remote telemedicine-based cardiac auscultation. Its utility in diagnosing and grading AS remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the TytoCare™ for assessing AS.
Methods: Sixty patients were classified by standard echocardiogram into three groups: significant AS (at least moderate AS; n=20), non-significant AS (aortic sclerosis or mild AS; n=20) and controls (n=20). Heart sounds were self-recorded using the TytoCare™ stethoscope. Fifteen blinded physicians - five each from primary care, internal medicine and cardiology - reviewed the recordings using standardized equipment and assigned diagnoses based on a categorical scale: 0=insufficient data, 1=normal, 2=mild AS and 3=at least moderate AS.
Results: The study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, with a mean±standard deviation age of 72.6±9.1years. The correct response rate for significant AS was 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 80-88%), with both cardiologists and non-cardiologists achieving≥80%. In contrast, performance declined in non-significant AS (57%, 95% CI: 51-62%), but remained high in the control group (87%, 95% CI: 82-90%). Cardiologists outperformed other physicians, overall (P=0.029) and in significant AS cases (P=0.022), while no significant differences were found among non-cardiologists.
Conclusions: TytoCare™ demonstrated high reliability in the remote assessment of significant AS by both cardiologists and non-cardiologists. Its intuitive and user-friendly design enables self-application, even among older populations, emphasizing its potential as an effective screening tool for AS across diverse healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.