Assessment of remote digital auscultation for identifying significant aortic stenosis: A pilot study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuval Avidan, Vsevolod Tabachnikov, Amir Aker
{"title":"Assessment of remote digital auscultation for identifying significant aortic stenosis: A pilot study.","authors":"Yuval Avidan, Vsevolod Tabachnikov, Amir Aker","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.06.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. Technological advances, such as the TytoCare™ device, have introduced remote telemedicine-based cardiac auscultation. Its utility in diagnosing and grading AS remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the TytoCare™ for assessing AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients were classified by standard echocardiogram into three groups: significant AS (at least moderate AS; n=20), non-significant AS (aortic sclerosis or mild AS; n=20) and controls (n=20). Heart sounds were self-recorded using the TytoCare™ stethoscope. Fifteen blinded physicians - five each from primary care, internal medicine and cardiology - reviewed the recordings using standardized equipment and assigned diagnoses based on a categorical scale: 0=insufficient data, 1=normal, 2=mild AS and 3=at least moderate AS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, with a mean±standard deviation age of 72.6±9.1years. The correct response rate for significant AS was 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 80-88%), with both cardiologists and non-cardiologists achieving≥80%. In contrast, performance declined in non-significant AS (57%, 95% CI: 51-62%), but remained high in the control group (87%, 95% CI: 82-90%). Cardiologists outperformed other physicians, overall (P=0.029) and in significant AS cases (P=0.022), while no significant differences were found among non-cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TytoCare™ demonstrated high reliability in the remote assessment of significant AS by both cardiologists and non-cardiologists. Its intuitive and user-friendly design enables self-application, even among older populations, emphasizing its potential as an effective screening tool for AS across diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2025.06.072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. Technological advances, such as the TytoCare™ device, have introduced remote telemedicine-based cardiac auscultation. Its utility in diagnosing and grading AS remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the TytoCare™ for assessing AS.

Methods: Sixty patients were classified by standard echocardiogram into three groups: significant AS (at least moderate AS; n=20), non-significant AS (aortic sclerosis or mild AS; n=20) and controls (n=20). Heart sounds were self-recorded using the TytoCare™ stethoscope. Fifteen blinded physicians - five each from primary care, internal medicine and cardiology - reviewed the recordings using standardized equipment and assigned diagnoses based on a categorical scale: 0=insufficient data, 1=normal, 2=mild AS and 3=at least moderate AS.

Results: The study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, with a mean±standard deviation age of 72.6±9.1years. The correct response rate for significant AS was 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 80-88%), with both cardiologists and non-cardiologists achieving≥80%. In contrast, performance declined in non-significant AS (57%, 95% CI: 51-62%), but remained high in the control group (87%, 95% CI: 82-90%). Cardiologists outperformed other physicians, overall (P=0.029) and in significant AS cases (P=0.022), while no significant differences were found among non-cardiologists.

Conclusions: TytoCare™ demonstrated high reliability in the remote assessment of significant AS by both cardiologists and non-cardiologists. Its intuitive and user-friendly design enables self-application, even among older populations, emphasizing its potential as an effective screening tool for AS across diverse healthcare settings.

评估远程数字听诊识别显著主动脉狭窄:一项初步研究。
背景:主动脉瓣狭窄(Aortic stenosis, AS)是西方最常见的瓣膜疾病。技术进步,如TytoCare™设备,已经引入了基于远程远程医疗的心脏听诊。它在AS诊断和分级中的应用仍未被探索。本研究旨在评估TytoCare™评估AS的可靠性。方法:60例患者通过标准超声心动图分为3组:明显AS(中度以上AS;n=20),非显著性AS(主动脉硬化或轻度AS;N =20)和对照组(N =20)。使用TytoCare™听诊器自录心音。15名盲法医生——来自初级保健、内科和心脏病学各5名——使用标准化设备审查记录,并根据分类量表进行诊断:0=数据不足,1=正常,2=轻度AS, 3=至少中度AS。结果:两个研究组的基线特征相似,平均±标准差年龄为72.6±9.1岁。对于显著AS的正确反应率为85%(95%可信区间[95% CI]: 80-88%),心脏病专家和非心脏病专家均达到≥80%。相比之下,非显著AS组的表现下降(57%,95% CI: 51-62%),但对照组的表现仍然很高(87%,95% CI: 82-90%)。心脏病专家在总体(P=0.029)和重大AS病例(P=0.022)上的表现优于其他医生,而在非心脏病专家之间没有发现显著差异。结论:TytoCare™在心脏病专家和非心脏病专家对显著AS的远程评估中表现出高可靠性。其直观和用户友好的设计允许自我应用,甚至在老年人中,强调其作为不同医疗保健环境中as的有效筛查工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信