Analysis of factors contributing to severity of AV crashes at intersections: Insights from the Autonomous Vehicle Operation Incident Dataset Across The Globe (AVOID).

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rui Guo, Yanyan Chen, Yunchao Zhang, Fuhua Yi
{"title":"Analysis of factors contributing to severity of AV crashes at intersections: Insights from the Autonomous Vehicle Operation Incident Dataset Across The Globe (AVOID).","authors":"Rui Guo, Yanyan Chen, Yunchao Zhang, Fuhua Yi","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2520006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The market for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is developing rapidly, while safety concerns persist as a critical challenge hindering their widespread development and commercialization. Intersections, characterized by highly dynamic and unpredictable traffic conditions, represent particularly high-risk scenarios for AVs. This study systematically investigates the key risk factors influencing collision severity at intersections to enhance AV safety performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs the Autonomous Vehicle Operation Crash Dataset Across The Globe (AVOID) to investigate the key factors influencing the injury severity of AV related collisions. A hybrid analytical framework is proposed, integrating an XGBoost-SHAP model for feature importance analysis and a multinomial logit (MNL) model for statistical inference. Following the factor importance ranking, nine critical determinants were selected to examine their individual effects on injury severity levels. Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP approach was utilized to explore interaction effects among significant factors, revealing synergistic relationships between key features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that the majority of crashes at intersections occurred when AVs were stationary or moving at low speeds (17.71% while stopped, 42.76% at speeds below 10 mph). Approximately 58.14% of the crashes involved autonomous driving mode, with an injury rate 14.5% higher compared to manual mode. Factors such as pre-crash movement, crash scene, contact area, pre-crash speed, and autonomous mode significantly influenced injury severity. Crashes occurring during straight-line travel or lane changes in autonomous mode tended to result in more severe injury compared to manual driving. Additionally, crashes in steering direction scenes at speeds between 10 and 20 mph were associated with higher injury severity, and speeds exceeding 20 mph in traffic through scenes led to even more severe injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals the main factors influencing the severity of collisions in autonomous vehicles and the combination of the following factors that may increase the severity of injuries: autonomous driving mode, lane changing, turning or crossing scenarios, and high-speed driving. The results advance the understanding of autonomous vehicle safety and offer potential implications for enhancing self-driving systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2520006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The market for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is developing rapidly, while safety concerns persist as a critical challenge hindering their widespread development and commercialization. Intersections, characterized by highly dynamic and unpredictable traffic conditions, represent particularly high-risk scenarios for AVs. This study systematically investigates the key risk factors influencing collision severity at intersections to enhance AV safety performance.

Methods: This study employs the Autonomous Vehicle Operation Crash Dataset Across The Globe (AVOID) to investigate the key factors influencing the injury severity of AV related collisions. A hybrid analytical framework is proposed, integrating an XGBoost-SHAP model for feature importance analysis and a multinomial logit (MNL) model for statistical inference. Following the factor importance ranking, nine critical determinants were selected to examine their individual effects on injury severity levels. Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP approach was utilized to explore interaction effects among significant factors, revealing synergistic relationships between key features.

Results: The results indicate that the majority of crashes at intersections occurred when AVs were stationary or moving at low speeds (17.71% while stopped, 42.76% at speeds below 10 mph). Approximately 58.14% of the crashes involved autonomous driving mode, with an injury rate 14.5% higher compared to manual mode. Factors such as pre-crash movement, crash scene, contact area, pre-crash speed, and autonomous mode significantly influenced injury severity. Crashes occurring during straight-line travel or lane changes in autonomous mode tended to result in more severe injury compared to manual driving. Additionally, crashes in steering direction scenes at speeds between 10 and 20 mph were associated with higher injury severity, and speeds exceeding 20 mph in traffic through scenes led to even more severe injuries.

Conclusions: This study reveals the main factors influencing the severity of collisions in autonomous vehicles and the combination of the following factors that may increase the severity of injuries: autonomous driving mode, lane changing, turning or crossing scenarios, and high-speed driving. The results advance the understanding of autonomous vehicle safety and offer potential implications for enhancing self-driving systems.

十字路口自动驾驶汽车碰撞严重程度的影响因素分析:来自全球自动驾驶汽车操作事件数据集(AVOID)的见解。
目标:自动驾驶汽车(AVs)市场正在迅速发展,而安全问题仍然是阻碍其广泛发展和商业化的关键挑战。十字路口具有高度动态和不可预测的交通状况,对自动驾驶汽车来说是特别高风险的场景。为了提高自动驾驶汽车的安全性能,本研究系统地研究了影响交叉口碰撞严重程度的关键危险因素。方法:采用全球自动驾驶汽车操作碰撞数据集(AVOID),研究影响自动驾驶汽车相关碰撞伤害严重程度的关键因素。提出了一种混合分析框架,将用于特征重要性分析的XGBoost-SHAP模型与用于统计推断的多项logit (MNL)模型相结合。根据因素重要性排名,我们选择了9个关键决定因素来检查它们对损伤严重程度的个体影响。此外,利用XGBoost-SHAP方法探索显著因子之间的交互作用,揭示关键特征之间的协同关系。结果:结果表明,在十字路口,大多数事故发生在自动驾驶汽车静止或低速行驶时(停车时占17.71%,车速低于10 mph时占42.76%)。大约58.14%的事故涉及自动驾驶模式,受伤率比手动模式高14.5%。碰撞前运动、碰撞现场、接触区域、碰撞前速度和自主模式等因素对损伤严重程度有显著影响。与手动驾驶相比,自动驾驶模式下直线行驶或变道时发生的碰撞往往会导致更严重的伤害。此外,在车速在10到20英里/小时之间的转向场景中,碰撞会导致更严重的伤害,而在车速超过20英里/小时的场景中,交通事故会导致更严重的伤害。结论:本研究揭示了影响自动驾驶汽车碰撞严重程度的主要因素,以及可能增加伤害严重程度的以下因素的组合:自动驾驶模式、变道、转弯或过马路场景以及高速驾驶。研究结果促进了对自动驾驶汽车安全性的理解,并为增强自动驾驶系统提供了潜在的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信