Clinical assessment of changes in basic prosthetic mobility using the component timed-up-and-go test: A retrospective cohort study in adults with lower-limb amputation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sheila Clemens, Todd Castleberry, Jim Scharf, Shane Wurdeman
{"title":"Clinical assessment of changes in basic prosthetic mobility using the component timed-up-and-go test: A retrospective cohort study in adults with lower-limb amputation.","authors":"Sheila Clemens, Todd Castleberry, Jim Scharf, Shane Wurdeman","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ideally, an individual will undergo rehabilitation to optimize functional abilities with a prosthetic leg after lower-limb amputation (LLA). Using standardized outcome measures capable of capturing changes in prosthetic mobility provides the clinical utility necessary to evaluate treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the potential of the component timed-up-and-go (cTUG) in evaluating changes in basic prosthetic mobility tasks after a structured prosthetic training program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention data was analyzed from individuals referred to a prosthetic training program. Specific subtasks of cTUG were assessed (the 180° turn and sit-to-stand transitions), as well as the total time to perform the test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data from 85 adults with unilateral LLA were analyzed. The study sample consisted of 75.3% of individuals with acquired LLA because of dysvascular causes, and 41.2% had transfemoral amputation. Individuals with transtibial amputation exhibited significantly faster performance of cTUG subtasks and total times than those with transfemoral amputation (P < 0.02). Stratified by amputation level, both groups exhibited significantly better cTUG scores upon final performance compared with initial performance in all subtasks and total time (P < 0.01). Furthermore, comparing cTUG times based on insurer (public or private insurance), individuals with private insurance generally outperformed those with public insurance, although significance varied based on amputation level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>cTUG exhibits the ability to capture changes in basic prosthetic mobility in individuals with varied causes and levels of LLA, enhancing confidence in the clinical utility of the test for measuring efficacy of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ideally, an individual will undergo rehabilitation to optimize functional abilities with a prosthetic leg after lower-limb amputation (LLA). Using standardized outcome measures capable of capturing changes in prosthetic mobility provides the clinical utility necessary to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Objective: To assess the potential of the component timed-up-and-go (cTUG) in evaluating changes in basic prosthetic mobility tasks after a structured prosthetic training program.

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Methods: Pre- and post-intervention data was analyzed from individuals referred to a prosthetic training program. Specific subtasks of cTUG were assessed (the 180° turn and sit-to-stand transitions), as well as the total time to perform the test.

Results: Complete data from 85 adults with unilateral LLA were analyzed. The study sample consisted of 75.3% of individuals with acquired LLA because of dysvascular causes, and 41.2% had transfemoral amputation. Individuals with transtibial amputation exhibited significantly faster performance of cTUG subtasks and total times than those with transfemoral amputation (P < 0.02). Stratified by amputation level, both groups exhibited significantly better cTUG scores upon final performance compared with initial performance in all subtasks and total time (P < 0.01). Furthermore, comparing cTUG times based on insurer (public or private insurance), individuals with private insurance generally outperformed those with public insurance, although significance varied based on amputation level.

Conclusions: cTUG exhibits the ability to capture changes in basic prosthetic mobility in individuals with varied causes and levels of LLA, enhancing confidence in the clinical utility of the test for measuring efficacy of interventions.

使用组件time -up-and-go测试对基本假肢活动能力变化的临床评估:一项针对下肢截肢成人的回顾性队列研究。
背景:理想情况下,在下肢截肢(LLA)后,个体将接受假肢康复以优化功能能力。使用标准化的结果测量能够捕捉假肢活动能力的变化,为评估治疗效果提供了必要的临床效用。目的:评估组件计时-起身-走(cTUG)的潜力在评估基本义肢活动任务的变化后,有组织的义肢训练计划。研究设计:回顾性队列。方法:对参与假肢训练计划的个体进行干预前和干预后的数据分析。评估了cTUG的特定子任务(180°转弯和从坐到站的转换),以及执行测试的总时间。结果:分析了85例成人单侧LLA的完整资料。研究样本包括75.3%因血管异常原因获得性LLA的个体,41.2%因经股截肢。经胫骨截肢组的cTUG子任务执行速度和总时间明显快于经股骨截肢组(P < 0.02)。按截肢水平分层,两组在所有子任务和总时间上的最终表现均显著高于初始表现(P < 0.01)。此外,比较基于保险公司(公共或私人保险)的cTUG时间,私人保险的个体通常优于公共保险的个体,尽管意义因截肢水平而异。结论:cTUG显示了在不同原因和LLA水平的个体中捕捉基本假肢活动能力变化的能力,增强了对测量干预效果的临床应用测试的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信