Ba Khuong Cao, Rachmadianti Sukma Hanifa, Thi-Phuong-Lan Nguyen, Maarten J Postma, Jurjen van der Schans
{"title":"Economic evaluations of vaccines against respiratory infections in adults in Southeast Asia: A systematic review.","authors":"Ba Khuong Cao, Rachmadianti Sukma Hanifa, Thi-Phuong-Lan Nguyen, Maarten J Postma, Jurjen van der Schans","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2528409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respiratory infections significantly impact adult health in Southeast Asia, yet vaccine coverage remains low. This systematic review evaluated the economic evaluations of vaccines targeting respiratory infections in the region. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, NHSEED, CINAHL, EconLit, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to April 24, 2024. Nineteen eligible studies were identified, focusing primarily on influenza (8 studies) and COVID-19 vaccines (7 studies), with fewer studies on pneumococcal (2 studies), varicella (1 study), and pertussis (1 study) vaccines. Overall, influenza, COVID-19 (boosters), and pneumococcal vaccines were found to be cost-effective or highly cost-effective compared to no-vaccine or no-booster scenarios. The only study on maternal pertussis vaccination found it not to be cost-effective. The most common parameters considered in sensitivity analyses were vaccine efficacy and discount rates. This review highlights the economic evaluations of influenza, COVID-19, and pneumococcal vaccines in Southeast Asia, providing essential evidence to guide vaccine policy. Future studies should address limitations in model selection, incorporate herd immunity, ensure the model validation (i.e. validity of cost and benefit measurements), and explore the cost-effectiveness of other vaccines across the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2528409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2528409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Respiratory infections significantly impact adult health in Southeast Asia, yet vaccine coverage remains low. This systematic review evaluated the economic evaluations of vaccines targeting respiratory infections in the region. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, NHSEED, CINAHL, EconLit, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to April 24, 2024. Nineteen eligible studies were identified, focusing primarily on influenza (8 studies) and COVID-19 vaccines (7 studies), with fewer studies on pneumococcal (2 studies), varicella (1 study), and pertussis (1 study) vaccines. Overall, influenza, COVID-19 (boosters), and pneumococcal vaccines were found to be cost-effective or highly cost-effective compared to no-vaccine or no-booster scenarios. The only study on maternal pertussis vaccination found it not to be cost-effective. The most common parameters considered in sensitivity analyses were vaccine efficacy and discount rates. This review highlights the economic evaluations of influenza, COVID-19, and pneumococcal vaccines in Southeast Asia, providing essential evidence to guide vaccine policy. Future studies should address limitations in model selection, incorporate herd immunity, ensure the model validation (i.e. validity of cost and benefit measurements), and explore the cost-effectiveness of other vaccines across the region.
呼吸道感染严重影响东南亚成年人的健康,但疫苗覆盖率仍然很低。本系统综述评估了该地区针对呼吸道感染的疫苗的经济评价。全面检索了几个数据库,包括MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, NHSEED, CINAHL, EconLit, Web of Science, Scopus和Cochrane Library,截止到2024年4月24日。我们确定了19项符合条件的研究,主要关注流感(8项研究)和COVID-19疫苗(7项研究),较少关注肺炎球菌(2项研究)、水痘(1项研究)和百日咳(1项研究)疫苗。总体而言,与不接种疫苗或不接种加强剂的情况相比,流感疫苗、COVID-19(加强剂)和肺炎球菌疫苗具有成本效益或高度成本效益。唯一一项关于母亲百日咳疫苗接种的研究发现它不具有成本效益。敏感性分析中最常考虑的参数是疫苗效力和贴现率。本综述重点介绍了东南亚对流感、COVID-19和肺炎球菌疫苗的经济评估,为指导疫苗政策提供了重要证据。未来的研究应解决模型选择的局限性,纳入群体免疫,确保模型验证(即成本和效益测量的有效性),并探索该地区其他疫苗的成本效益。
期刊介绍:
(formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619)
Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.