Patient experiences of tuberculosis treatment deferral after a trace Xpert Ultra result: a prospective cohort study.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Caitlin Visek, James Mukiibi, Mariam Nantale, Annet Nalutaaya, Patrick Biché, Joowhan Sung, Francis Kayondo, Joab Akampurira, Michael Mukiibi, Rogers Kiyonga, Achilles Katamba, Emily A Kendall
{"title":"Patient experiences of tuberculosis treatment deferral after a trace Xpert Ultra result: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Caitlin Visek, James Mukiibi, Mariam Nantale, Annet Nalutaaya, Patrick Biché, Joowhan Sung, Francis Kayondo, Joab Akampurira, Michael Mukiibi, Rogers Kiyonga, Achilles Katamba, Emily A Kendall","doi":"10.1186/s40249-025-01338-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A \"trace\" result from the Xpert Ultra molecular tuberculosis test indicates Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection but may not always signify tuberculosis disease. Little is known about the experiences of individuals with trace results who are not immediately treated. We surveyed patients with trace results to better understand their experiences and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled adults and adolescents with trace Xpert Ultra sputum results, plus individuals with positive (at a semiquantitative level greater than trace) results (\"positive controls\") and with negative results (\"negative controls\"), from community-screening and clinic settings in Kampala, Uganda between February 2021 and December 2024. After an extensive clinical, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation, participants not recommended to start tuberculosis treatment immediately were closely monitored with interval reassessments. Starting in September 2021, surveys captured participants' perceptions and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status at baseline and one and six months later. We compared categorial variables using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 329 people with trace sputum (PWTS), 241 positive controls, and 279 negative controls were enrolled. Among PWTS surveyed, 22% (28/129) and 23% (30/129) thought they were likely to have or develop tuberculosis, respectively, and most reported low associated anxiety initially (80%, 263/329) and during follow-up. While 53% (174/329) would have favored treatment at baseline if not in the study, only 30% (41/136) of those who remained untreated were inclined toward treatment at six months. Participants chose a sensitive hypothetical test, even with high false-positivity risk, over one with lower sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most PWTS in our study reported a low self-perceived likelihood of having or developing tuberculosis and low anxiety during follow up. Deferring treatment for PWTS is acceptable to most patients when sufficient testing and monitoring are available; in other contexts, upfront treatment may be preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"14 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01338-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A "trace" result from the Xpert Ultra molecular tuberculosis test indicates Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection but may not always signify tuberculosis disease. Little is known about the experiences of individuals with trace results who are not immediately treated. We surveyed patients with trace results to better understand their experiences and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status.

Methods: We enrolled adults and adolescents with trace Xpert Ultra sputum results, plus individuals with positive (at a semiquantitative level greater than trace) results ("positive controls") and with negative results ("negative controls"), from community-screening and clinic settings in Kampala, Uganda between February 2021 and December 2024. After an extensive clinical, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation, participants not recommended to start tuberculosis treatment immediately were closely monitored with interval reassessments. Starting in September 2021, surveys captured participants' perceptions and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status at baseline and one and six months later. We compared categorial variables using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: A total of 329 people with trace sputum (PWTS), 241 positive controls, and 279 negative controls were enrolled. Among PWTS surveyed, 22% (28/129) and 23% (30/129) thought they were likely to have or develop tuberculosis, respectively, and most reported low associated anxiety initially (80%, 263/329) and during follow-up. While 53% (174/329) would have favored treatment at baseline if not in the study, only 30% (41/136) of those who remained untreated were inclined toward treatment at six months. Participants chose a sensitive hypothetical test, even with high false-positivity risk, over one with lower sensitivity.

Conclusions: Most PWTS in our study reported a low self-perceived likelihood of having or developing tuberculosis and low anxiety during follow up. Deferring treatment for PWTS is acceptable to most patients when sufficient testing and monitoring are available; in other contexts, upfront treatment may be preferable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

患者经历结核治疗延迟后跟踪Xpert Ultra结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:Xpert超分子结核试验的“痕量”结果表明检测到结核分枝杆菌DNA,但不一定意味着结核病。对于没有立即治疗的微量结果个体的经历知之甚少。我们调查了有痕量结果的患者,以更好地了解他们的经历和与他们不确定的结核病状况相关的偏好。方法:我们招募了具有微量Xpert Ultra痰结果的成人和青少年,以及在2021年2月至2024年12月期间来自乌干达坎帕拉社区筛查和诊所设置的阳性(半定量水平大于痕量)结果(“阳性对照”)和阴性结果(“阴性对照”)的个体。在广泛的临床、实验室和放射学评估后,不建议立即开始结核病治疗的参与者被密切监测,并进行间隔重新评估。从2021年9月开始,调查收集了参与者在基线时以及1个月和6个月后对其不确定的结核病状况的看法和偏好。我们使用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较类别变量,显著性水平为0.05。结果:共纳入微量痰(PWTS) 329例,阳性对照241例,阴性对照279例。在接受调查的PWTS中,分别有22%(28/129)和23%(30/129)认为他们可能患有或发展为结核病,大多数人在最初(80%,263/329)和随访期间报告了低相关焦虑。虽然53%(174/329)的人如果不在研究中,会倾向于基线治疗,但只有30%(41/136)的人在六个月时倾向于治疗。参与者选择了一个敏感的假设测试,即使假阳性风险很高,而不是一个敏感度较低的测试。结论:在我们的研究中,大多数PWTS在随访期间报告了患结核病或发展结核病的低自我认知可能性和低焦虑。如果有足够的检测和监测,大多数病人可以接受延迟治疗;在其他情况下,预先治疗可能更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信