Rita Opoku-Danso, Isaac Tetteh Commey, Dorcas Frempomaa Agyare, Gifty Owusu, Mustapha Amoadu, Susanna Aba Abraham
{"title":"Quality faculty-nursing students' relationship: a systematic review of facilitators, barriers, and impact on students.","authors":"Rita Opoku-Danso, Isaac Tetteh Commey, Dorcas Frempomaa Agyare, Gifty Owusu, Mustapha Amoadu, Susanna Aba Abraham","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03580-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faculty-student relationships are central to the academic and professional development of nursing students. This review aimed to systematically identify and synthesise existing evidence on the facilitators and barriers to quality faculty-nursing student relationships and their impact on student outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were carried out across major databases including PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, JSTOR, Dimensions.ai, and others. Studies published in English between 2000 and 2025 that focused on faculty-nursing student relationships were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools and mixed-method appraisal tool, and thematic synthesis was employed to analyse and report findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight studies were included in the final synthesis. Key barriers identified included disrespectful behaviours, ineffective teaching, poor communication, institutional constraints, and discrimination. These factors contributed to psychological distress, disengagement, and reduced academic performance. Facilitators of positive relationships included strong faculty support, caring behaviours, respectful and inclusive interactions, effective communication, and structured learning environments. Positive relationships were associated with improved confidence, motivation, clinical readiness, and professional identity formation. Poor-quality relationships, in contrast, may be linked to emotional distress and negative perceptions of the nursing profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from the included studies suggest that the quality of the faculty-nursing student relationship plays a critical role in shaping student experiences and outcomes. Strengthening relational practices in nursing education may support student development and promote more inclusive and effective learning environments. Further research is needed to explore interventions across diverse settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03580-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Faculty-student relationships are central to the academic and professional development of nursing students. This review aimed to systematically identify and synthesise existing evidence on the facilitators and barriers to quality faculty-nursing student relationships and their impact on student outcomes.
Method: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were carried out across major databases including PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, JSTOR, Dimensions.ai, and others. Studies published in English between 2000 and 2025 that focused on faculty-nursing student relationships were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools and mixed-method appraisal tool, and thematic synthesis was employed to analyse and report findings.
Results: Thirty-eight studies were included in the final synthesis. Key barriers identified included disrespectful behaviours, ineffective teaching, poor communication, institutional constraints, and discrimination. These factors contributed to psychological distress, disengagement, and reduced academic performance. Facilitators of positive relationships included strong faculty support, caring behaviours, respectful and inclusive interactions, effective communication, and structured learning environments. Positive relationships were associated with improved confidence, motivation, clinical readiness, and professional identity formation. Poor-quality relationships, in contrast, may be linked to emotional distress and negative perceptions of the nursing profession.
Conclusion: Findings from the included studies suggest that the quality of the faculty-nursing student relationship plays a critical role in shaping student experiences and outcomes. Strengthening relational practices in nursing education may support student development and promote more inclusive and effective learning environments. Further research is needed to explore interventions across diverse settings.
背景:师生关系是护理专业学生学术和专业发展的核心。本综述旨在系统地识别和综合现有的证据,以促进和障碍的质量教师-护理学生的关系和他们对学生的影响结果。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。在PubMed Central、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、ERIC、JSTOR、Dimensions等主要数据库中进行了全面的搜索。等等。2000年至2025年间以英语发表的研究集中在教师与护理学生的关系上。采用Joana Briggs研究所(JBI)关键评估工具和混合方法评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估,并采用主题综合分析和报告结果。结果:38项研究被纳入最终的综合。确定的主要障碍包括不尊重行为、无效教学、沟通不良、制度限制和歧视。这些因素导致了心理困扰、不投入、学习成绩下降。积极关系的促进因素包括强大的教师支持、关怀行为、尊重和包容的互动、有效的沟通和结构化的学习环境。积极的人际关系与自信心、动机、临床准备和职业认同形成的提高有关。相比之下,低质量的人际关系可能与情绪困扰和对护理职业的负面看法有关。结论:纳入的研究结果表明,护校师生关系的质量在塑造学生体验和结果方面起着关键作用。加强护理教育中的关系实践可以支持学生的发展,促进更包容和有效的学习环境。需要进一步的研究来探索不同环境下的干预措施。临床试验号:不适用。
期刊介绍:
BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.