Efficacy of interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms induced by traumatic medical events: a systematic review.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Corinne Meinhausen, Katherine Fu, Richard D Urbina, Tanisha Gunby, Lauren A Perez, Patrick A Wilson, Christina M Luberto, Jennifer A Sumner
{"title":"Efficacy of interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms induced by traumatic medical events: a systematic review.","authors":"Corinne Meinhausen, Katherine Fu, Richard D Urbina, Tanisha Gunby, Lauren A Perez, Patrick A Wilson, Christina M Luberto, Jennifer A Sumner","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serious medical events are increasingly recognised as potential triggers for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of interventions for medically induced PTSD. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024504055). Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of interventions for adults diagnosed with, or exhibiting elevated symptoms of, PTSD related to life-threatening medical events. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Group differences at follow-up were assessed using independent <i>t</i>-tests for statistical significance, and Cohen's <i>d</i> was calculated to measure effect sizes. Eleven trials (sample sizes: 17-89) met inclusion criteria, with PTSD primarily resulting from cardiovascular events (<i>n</i> = 5) or cancer (<i>n</i> = 4). Interventions included trauma-focused psychotherapies (<i>n</i> = 8; e.g., Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing [EMDR]) and others (<i>n</i> = 3; e.g., supportive therapy). Most studies reported significant posttreatment differences and large effect sizes favouring the intervention group, with EMDR and other trauma-focused psychotherapies particularly well-supported. Common limitations included small sample sizes, use of self-reported outcomes, and high dropout rates. Results highlight the efficacy of several interventions for medically induced PTSD and the need for larger trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serious medical events are increasingly recognised as potential triggers for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of interventions for medically induced PTSD. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024504055). Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of interventions for adults diagnosed with, or exhibiting elevated symptoms of, PTSD related to life-threatening medical events. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Group differences at follow-up were assessed using independent t-tests for statistical significance, and Cohen's d was calculated to measure effect sizes. Eleven trials (sample sizes: 17-89) met inclusion criteria, with PTSD primarily resulting from cardiovascular events (n = 5) or cancer (n = 4). Interventions included trauma-focused psychotherapies (n = 8; e.g., Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing [EMDR]) and others (n = 3; e.g., supportive therapy). Most studies reported significant posttreatment differences and large effect sizes favouring the intervention group, with EMDR and other trauma-focused psychotherapies particularly well-supported. Common limitations included small sample sizes, use of self-reported outcomes, and high dropout rates. Results highlight the efficacy of several interventions for medically induced PTSD and the need for larger trials.

干预措施对创伤性医疗事件引起的创伤后应激障碍症状的疗效:一项系统综述。
严重的医疗事件越来越被认为是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的潜在诱因。本系统综述评估了药物性创伤后应激障碍干预措施的疗效。检索自成立至2023年11月的9个电子数据库(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024504055)。符合条件的研究是对被诊断患有或表现出与危及生命的医疗事件相关的PTSD症状升高的成年人进行干预的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。随访时的组间差异采用独立t检验进行统计显著性评估,并计算Cohen’s d来衡量效应量。11项试验(样本量:17-89)符合纳入标准,其中PTSD主要由心血管事件(n = 5)或癌症(n = 4)引起。干预措施包括以创伤为重点的心理治疗(n = 8;例如,眼动脱敏和再处理[EMDR])和其他(n = 3;例如,支持性治疗)。大多数研究报告了显著的治疗后差异和支持干预组的大效应,EMDR和其他以创伤为重点的心理治疗得到了特别好的支持。常见的限制包括样本量小、使用自我报告的结果和高辍学率。结果强调了几种干预措施对医学诱发的创伤后应激障碍的疗效,并需要进行更大规模的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信