A cluster randomised crossover trial of single resilience and professionalism tutorials among undergraduate medical students.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2529964
David Byrne, Anne Hickey, Denis Harkin, Aine Ryan, Catherine Moran, Fiona Boland, Jan Illing, Laura Staines, Mohamed Abdelnasser, Lisa Mellon, Caroline Kelleher, Frank Doyle
{"title":"A cluster randomised crossover trial of single resilience and professionalism tutorials among undergraduate medical students.","authors":"David Byrne, Anne Hickey, Denis Harkin, Aine Ryan, Catherine Moran, Fiona Boland, Jan Illing, Laura Staines, Mohamed Abdelnasser, Lisa Mellon, Caroline Kelleher, Frank Doyle","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2529964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that targeted interventions can improve medical students' perceptions of professionalism and professional identity formation, resilience and coping skills. However, it is unclear how many educational sessions are required for a meaningful impact. We aimed to determine the impact of single resilience/professionalism tutorials on Year 1 medical students' coping self-efficacy and resilience and perceptions of professionalism and professional identity formation. We also conducted a qualitative process evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cluster crossover design was used to evaluate tutorials. Student groups were randomly allocated to 'resilience first' and 'professionalism first' classes, followed immediately by the alternative tutorial. Students (<i>n</i> = 106) completed the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) and Penn State Questionnaire on Professionalism (PSCOM) before the first tutorial, between tutorials, and after the second tutorial. Differences in CSES and PSCOM scores between groups were assessed using multivariate analysis of variance. Findings were presented to students (<i>n</i>=6) and focus group data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within-group effects showed significant increases in scores for CSES and PSCOM, but irrespective of original group allocation. Qualitative results suggested three themes: positive aspects, limitations, and improving training. Several logistical issues were identified that may have inhibited tutorial efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While we found increased self-efficacy and professionalism scores, these could not be related to the efficacy of respective single tutorials, suggesting that multiple tutorials are required to impact these outcomes. While cross-over designs are feasible to implement, logistical issues may detract from their efficacy. Tutorials could potentially be improved by introducing more interactive learning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2529964"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2529964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that targeted interventions can improve medical students' perceptions of professionalism and professional identity formation, resilience and coping skills. However, it is unclear how many educational sessions are required for a meaningful impact. We aimed to determine the impact of single resilience/professionalism tutorials on Year 1 medical students' coping self-efficacy and resilience and perceptions of professionalism and professional identity formation. We also conducted a qualitative process evaluation.

Methods: A cluster crossover design was used to evaluate tutorials. Student groups were randomly allocated to 'resilience first' and 'professionalism first' classes, followed immediately by the alternative tutorial. Students (n = 106) completed the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) and Penn State Questionnaire on Professionalism (PSCOM) before the first tutorial, between tutorials, and after the second tutorial. Differences in CSES and PSCOM scores between groups were assessed using multivariate analysis of variance. Findings were presented to students (n=6) and focus group data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

Results: Within-group effects showed significant increases in scores for CSES and PSCOM, but irrespective of original group allocation. Qualitative results suggested three themes: positive aspects, limitations, and improving training. Several logistical issues were identified that may have inhibited tutorial efficacy.

Conclusion: While we found increased self-efficacy and professionalism scores, these could not be related to the efficacy of respective single tutorials, suggesting that multiple tutorials are required to impact these outcomes. While cross-over designs are feasible to implement, logistical issues may detract from their efficacy. Tutorials could potentially be improved by introducing more interactive learning methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医大学生单项心理弹性与专业素养辅导的整群随机交叉试验。
背景:有针对性的干预可以提高医学生的专业意识和职业认同的形成、心理韧性和应对技能。然而,目前尚不清楚需要多少次教育会议才能产生有意义的影响。本研究旨在探讨单一弹性/专业辅导对医学生应对自我效能感和弹性、专业认知和职业认同形成的影响。我们还进行了定性的过程评价。方法:采用聚类交叉设计对教学进行评价。学生小组被随机分配到“弹性第一”和“专业第一”的班级,紧接着是另一种辅导。106名学生在第一次辅导课前、辅导课间和辅导课后分别填写了应对自我效能量表(CSES)和宾夕法尼亚州立大学职业素养问卷(PSCOM)。采用多变量方差分析评估两组间CSES和PSCOM评分的差异。研究结果呈现给学生(n=6),焦点小组数据使用反思性主题分析进行分析。结果:组内效应显示CSES和PSCOM得分显著增加,但与原始组分配无关。定性结果显示了三个主题:积极方面、局限性和改进训练。几个后勤问题被确认可能抑制了辅导效果。结论:虽然我们发现自我效能感和专业精神得分有所提高,但这些与各自的单个教程的效果无关,这表明需要多个教程来影响这些结果。虽然交叉设计是可行的,但后勤问题可能会降低其有效性。教程可以通过引入更多的互动学习方法来改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信