Experience of the use of Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Q2 Medicine
Lan Zhang, Xinmin Liu, Ziwei Xi, Fei Yuan, Jing Yao, Zhengming Jiang, Yunfeng Yan, Guangyuan Song
{"title":"Experience of the use of Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Lan Zhang, Xinmin Liu, Ziwei Xi, Fei Yuan, Jing Yao, Zhengming Jiang, Yunfeng Yan, Guangyuan Song","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study is a subgroup analysis of the Chinese Registry of moderate to severe valvular heart disease (CREDIT), which has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075006).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing TAVR with the Sentinel CEPD from October 2023 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 80 patients were included, with a median age of 72 (68, 76) years, including 52 males (65.0%) and 28 females (35.0%), 62 patients (77.5%) with tricuspid valves, and 18 (22.5%) with bicuspid valves; 34 patients (42.5%) with type Ⅰ aortic arch, 24 patients (30.0%) with type Ⅱ aortic arch, 12 patients (15.0%) with type Ⅲ aortic arch, and 10 patients (12.5%) with bovine-type aortic arch. Clinical data of the patients were summarized and analyzed. The primary endpoints were success rate of Sentinel CEPD implantation, as well as all-cause death, symptomatic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and Sentinel CEPD access vessel complications during hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 80 patients, Self-expanding valves were used in 68 cases (85.0%) and balloon-expandable valves in 12 cases (15.0%). Seventy-nine patients (98.8%) successfully underwent TAVR with Sentinel CEPD deployment. 98.8% (79/80) successful CEPD deployment. Macroscopically visible debris was captured in 93.8% (75/80) by filters of Sentinel CEPD. Although the procedure time for Sentinel CEPD placement was slightly longer in patients with bovine aortic arch, there was no statistically significant difference in deployment time among different aortic arch types (<i>P</i>>0.05). During hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively, only one case of transient ischemic attack occurred, there was no all-cause mortality, symptomatic stroke, or access-site vascular complications related to the Sentinel CEPD observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sentinel CEPD demonstrates high feasibility across aortic arch types, potential efficacy in embolic capture, and excellent safety in TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study is a subgroup analysis of the Chinese Registry of moderate to severe valvular heart disease (CREDIT), which has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075006).

Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR with the Sentinel CEPD from October 2023 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 80 patients were included, with a median age of 72 (68, 76) years, including 52 males (65.0%) and 28 females (35.0%), 62 patients (77.5%) with tricuspid valves, and 18 (22.5%) with bicuspid valves; 34 patients (42.5%) with type Ⅰ aortic arch, 24 patients (30.0%) with type Ⅱ aortic arch, 12 patients (15.0%) with type Ⅲ aortic arch, and 10 patients (12.5%) with bovine-type aortic arch. Clinical data of the patients were summarized and analyzed. The primary endpoints were success rate of Sentinel CEPD implantation, as well as all-cause death, symptomatic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and Sentinel CEPD access vessel complications during hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively.

Results: In the 80 patients, Self-expanding valves were used in 68 cases (85.0%) and balloon-expandable valves in 12 cases (15.0%). Seventy-nine patients (98.8%) successfully underwent TAVR with Sentinel CEPD deployment. 98.8% (79/80) successful CEPD deployment. Macroscopically visible debris was captured in 93.8% (75/80) by filters of Sentinel CEPD. Although the procedure time for Sentinel CEPD placement was slightly longer in patients with bovine aortic arch, there was no statistically significant difference in deployment time among different aortic arch types (P>0.05). During hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively, only one case of transient ischemic attack occurred, there was no all-cause mortality, symptomatic stroke, or access-site vascular complications related to the Sentinel CEPD observed.

Conclusions: The Sentinel CEPD demonstrates high feasibility across aortic arch types, potential efficacy in embolic capture, and excellent safety in TAVR.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术中前哨脑栓塞保护装置的应用体会。
目的:评价前哨脑栓塞保护装置(CEPD)在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的可行性、有效性和安全性。本研究是已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2300075006)注册的中国中重度瓣膜性心脏病注册中心(CREDIT)的亚组分析。方法:回顾性纳入2023年10月至2024年9月接受TAVR并前哨CEPD的患者。共纳入80例患者,中位年龄为72(68,76)岁,其中男性52例(65.0%),女性28例(35.0%),三尖瓣62例(77.5%),二尖瓣18例(22.5%);Ⅰ型主动脉弓34例(42.5%),Ⅱ型主动脉弓24例(30.0%),Ⅲ型主动脉弓12例(15.0%),牛型主动脉弓10例(12.5%)。对患者的临床资料进行总结分析。主要终点为住院期间和术后30天内前哨点CEPD植入成功率、全因死亡、症状性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作、前哨点CEPD通路血管并发症。结果:80例患者中,自膨胀瓣膜68例(85.0%),球囊膨胀瓣膜12例(15.0%)。79例(98.8%)患者成功接受了前哨CEPD部署的TAVR。98.8%(79/80)成功部署CEPD。Sentinel CEPD的滤光片捕获了93.8%(75/80)的宏观可见碎片。虽然牛主动脉弓患者哨兵CEPD放置时间稍长,但不同主动脉弓类型的部署时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。住院期间及术后30天内,仅发生1例短暂性脑缺血发作,无全因死亡、症状性脑卒中或前哨点CEPD相关的通路血管并发症。结论:前哨CEPD在主动脉弓类型上具有很高的可行性,在栓塞捕获方面具有潜在的有效性,并且在TAVR中具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信