[Experience of the use of cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve replacement].

Q2 Medicine
Lan Zhang, Xinmin Liu, Ziwei Xi, Fei Yuan, Jing Yao, Zhengming Jiang, Yunfeng Yan, Guangyuan Song
{"title":"[Experience of the use of cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve replacement].","authors":"Lan Zhang, Xinmin Liu, Ziwei Xi, Fei Yuan, Jing Yao, Zhengming Jiang, Yunfeng Yan, Guangyuan Song","doi":"10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study is a subgroup analysis of the China Moderate to Severe Valvular Heart Disease Registry, which has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075006).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing TAVR with the Sentinel CEPD from October 2023 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 80 patients were included, with a median age of 72 (68, 76) years, including 52 males (65.0%) and 28 females (35.0%); 62 patients (77.5%) with tricuspid valves, and 18 patients (22.5%) with bicuspid valves; 34 patients (42.5%) with type Ⅰ aortic arch, 24 patients (30.0%) with type Ⅱ aortic arch, 12 patients (15.0%) with type Ⅲ aortic arch, and 10 patients (12.5%) with bovine-type aortic arch. Clinical data of the patients were summarized and analyzed. The primary endpoints were success rate of Sentinel CEPD implantation, as well as all-cause death, symptomatic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and Sentinel CEPD access vessel complications during hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 80 patients, self-expanding valves were used in 68 cases (85.0%) and balloon-expandable valves in 12 cases (15.0%). Seventy-nine patients (98.8%) successfully underwent TAVR with Sentinel CEPD deployment. Macroscopically visible debris was captured in 92.5% (74/80) by filters of Sentinel CEPD. Although the procedure time for Sentinel CEPD placement was slightly longer in patients with bovine-type aortic arch, there was no statistically significant difference in deployment time among different aortic arch types (<i>P</i>>0.05). During hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively, only one case of transient ischemic attack occurred, and there was no all-cause mortality, symptomatic stroke, or access-site vascular complications related to the Sentinel CEPD observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sentinel CEPD demonstrates high feasibility across aortic arch types, potential efficacy in embolic capture, and excellent safety in TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":24007,"journal":{"name":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"541-548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study is a subgroup analysis of the China Moderate to Severe Valvular Heart Disease Registry, which has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075006).

Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR with the Sentinel CEPD from October 2023 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 80 patients were included, with a median age of 72 (68, 76) years, including 52 males (65.0%) and 28 females (35.0%); 62 patients (77.5%) with tricuspid valves, and 18 patients (22.5%) with bicuspid valves; 34 patients (42.5%) with type Ⅰ aortic arch, 24 patients (30.0%) with type Ⅱ aortic arch, 12 patients (15.0%) with type Ⅲ aortic arch, and 10 patients (12.5%) with bovine-type aortic arch. Clinical data of the patients were summarized and analyzed. The primary endpoints were success rate of Sentinel CEPD implantation, as well as all-cause death, symptomatic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and Sentinel CEPD access vessel complications during hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively.

Results: In the 80 patients, self-expanding valves were used in 68 cases (85.0%) and balloon-expandable valves in 12 cases (15.0%). Seventy-nine patients (98.8%) successfully underwent TAVR with Sentinel CEPD deployment. Macroscopically visible debris was captured in 92.5% (74/80) by filters of Sentinel CEPD. Although the procedure time for Sentinel CEPD placement was slightly longer in patients with bovine-type aortic arch, there was no statistically significant difference in deployment time among different aortic arch types (P>0.05). During hospitalization and within 30 days postoperatively, only one case of transient ischemic attack occurred, and there was no all-cause mortality, symptomatic stroke, or access-site vascular complications related to the Sentinel CEPD observed.

Conclusions: The Sentinel CEPD demonstrates high feasibility across aortic arch types, potential efficacy in embolic capture, and excellent safety in TAVR.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术中前哨脑栓塞保护装置的应用体会。
目的:评价前哨脑栓塞保护装置(CEPD)在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的可行性、有效性和安全性。本研究是已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2300075006)注册的中国中重度瓣膜性心脏病注册中心(CREDIT)的亚组分析。方法:回顾性纳入2023年10月至2024年9月接受TAVR并前哨CEPD的患者。共纳入80例患者,中位年龄为72(68,76)岁,其中男性52例(65.0%),女性28例(35.0%),三尖瓣62例(77.5%),二尖瓣18例(22.5%);Ⅰ型主动脉弓34例(42.5%),Ⅱ型主动脉弓24例(30.0%),Ⅲ型主动脉弓12例(15.0%),牛型主动脉弓10例(12.5%)。对患者的临床资料进行总结分析。主要终点为住院期间和术后30天内前哨点CEPD植入成功率、全因死亡、症状性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作、前哨点CEPD通路血管并发症。结果:80例患者中,自膨胀瓣膜68例(85.0%),球囊膨胀瓣膜12例(15.0%)。79例(98.8%)患者成功接受了前哨CEPD部署的TAVR。98.8%(79/80)成功部署CEPD。Sentinel CEPD的滤光片捕获了93.8%(75/80)的宏观可见碎片。虽然牛主动脉弓患者哨兵CEPD放置时间稍长,但不同主动脉弓类型的部署时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。住院期间及术后30天内,仅发生1例短暂性脑缺血发作,无全因死亡、症状性脑卒中或前哨点CEPD相关的通路血管并发症。结论:前哨CEPD在主动脉弓类型上具有很高的可行性,在栓塞捕获方面具有潜在的有效性,并且在TAVR中具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信