Systematic review of fruit and vegetable voucher interventions for pregnant women and families with young children.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Grace Grove, Nida Ziauddeen, Mary Malone, Dianna Smith, Nisreen Alwan
{"title":"Systematic review of fruit and vegetable voucher interventions for pregnant women and families with young children.","authors":"Grace Grove, Nida Ziauddeen, Mary Malone, Dianna Smith, Nisreen Alwan","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025100657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to explore the impact of food voucher schemes during pregnancy and early life on fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption and explore experiences of schemes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched. Interventional, observational, qualitative and mixed methods studies published from January 2000 to April 2024 in English were included.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Food voucher interventions targeting F&V intake.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Low-income pregnant women and families with young children (aged under 5 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7,344 peer reviewed records, and 103 grey literature documents were screened. Sixteen peer reviewed studies (across eighteen reports) and eight grey literature documents met the inclusion criteria. All studies took place in the UK or the USA. There was a lack of consistency across primary quantitative outcomes. Overall, F&V voucher schemes did appear to increase fruit and/or vegetable consumption, but confidence in this finding was low. Qualitative data was more consistent. F&V vouchers were used in three main ways; as a financial benefit to subsidise food already being purchased, to increase the quantity or variety of F&V purchased, or as a safety net, to be used to ensure that the family had something to eat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>F&V vouchers may increase F&V intake and are positively received by recipients. This review also highlights some of the difficulties that researchers face in evaluating the impact of public health measures to improve population health. It is clear that more high quality research is required to better understand the impacts of F&V vouchers on individual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aimed to explore the impact of food voucher schemes during pregnancy and early life on fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption and explore experiences of schemes.

Design: Six electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched. Interventional, observational, qualitative and mixed methods studies published from January 2000 to April 2024 in English were included.

Setting: Food voucher interventions targeting F&V intake.

Participants: Low-income pregnant women and families with young children (aged under 5 years).

Results: 7,344 peer reviewed records, and 103 grey literature documents were screened. Sixteen peer reviewed studies (across eighteen reports) and eight grey literature documents met the inclusion criteria. All studies took place in the UK or the USA. There was a lack of consistency across primary quantitative outcomes. Overall, F&V voucher schemes did appear to increase fruit and/or vegetable consumption, but confidence in this finding was low. Qualitative data was more consistent. F&V vouchers were used in three main ways; as a financial benefit to subsidise food already being purchased, to increase the quantity or variety of F&V purchased, or as a safety net, to be used to ensure that the family had something to eat.

Conclusions: F&V vouchers may increase F&V intake and are positively received by recipients. This review also highlights some of the difficulties that researchers face in evaluating the impact of public health measures to improve population health. It is clear that more high quality research is required to better understand the impacts of F&V vouchers on individual outcomes.

对孕妇和有幼儿的家庭的水果和蔬菜代金券干预的系统评价。
目的:本系统综述旨在探讨怀孕和生命早期食品券计划对水果和蔬菜消费的影响,并探讨计划的经验。设计:检索6个电子数据库和灰色文献来源。纳入2000年1月至2024年4月发表的干预性、观察性、定性和混合方法的英文研究。设定:食品券干预针对食品和饮料的摄入。参与者:低收入孕妇和有幼儿(5岁以下)的家庭。结果:共筛选同行评议文献7344篇,灰色文献103篇。16项同行评议研究(共18份报告)和8份灰色文献符合纳入标准。所有的研究都在英国或美国进行。主要定量结果缺乏一致性。总的来说,餐饮券计划确实增加了水果和/或蔬菜的消费,但对这一发现的信心很低。定性数据更为一致。餐饮券主要有三种使用方式;作为一种经济利益来补贴已经购买的食品,增加购买的食品和饮料的数量或种类,或者作为一个安全网,用来确保家庭有东西吃。结论:餐食券可以增加餐食的摄入量,并得到接受者的积极接受。这篇综述还强调了研究人员在评估改善人口健康的公共卫生措施的影响时所面临的一些困难。很明显,需要更多高质量的研究来更好地理解食品和医疗券对个人结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信