Evaluation of the Baseplate Position and Screws in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using 3D Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Wonhee Lee, Woojin Yu, HwaYong Lee, Guk Bae Kim, In-Ho Jeon, Kyoung Hwan Koh
{"title":"Evaluation of the Baseplate Position and Screws in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using 3D Printed Patient-Specific Instrumentation.","authors":"Wonhee Lee, Woojin Yu, HwaYong Lee, Guk Bae Kim, In-Ho Jeon, Kyoung Hwan Koh","doi":"10.1002/jor.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty has been used to translate preoperative surgical planning into precise implant positioning. However, screws for baseplate fixation using PSI have not been preoperatively planned or verified for proper location and length. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of the 3D-printed PSI system for baseplate and screw positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and the role of preoperative screw planning. Postoperative CT data from 30 patients who underwent primary rTSA using PSI were collected. After ideal position planning of the baseplate and screws, a PSI guide was 3D-printed. Postoperative CT evaluated baseplate version, inclination, and translation. Screw length, insertion angle, and potential penetration of the spinoglenoid and suprascapular notch were investigated. The mean differences between planned and actual implantation were 2.7° ± 5.8° for version, 0.9° ± 3.5° for inclination, and 1.0° ± 5.4° for rotation. The mean translation difference was 1.7 ± 1.0 mm. The mean screw angulation differences were -0.5° ± 6.4° anteroposteriorly and -1.4° ± 7.1° superior-inferiorly. There was no risk of nerve injury from suprascapular notch involvement because it was considered that the screw was positioned away from the nerve path. The posterior screw was abandoned in 93.3% of patients due to proximity to the suprascapular nerve or insufficient length for bone purchase (mean length: 9.3 ± 2.0 mm). Using PSI, the reproducibility of baseplate and screw placement in rTSA was confirmed. The posterior screw has a limited role due to its length and direction constraints. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative planning and PSI enable precise surgery, including proper screw insertion and baseplate positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in shoulder arthroplasty has been used to translate preoperative surgical planning into precise implant positioning. However, screws for baseplate fixation using PSI have not been preoperatively planned or verified for proper location and length. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of the 3D-printed PSI system for baseplate and screw positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and the role of preoperative screw planning. Postoperative CT data from 30 patients who underwent primary rTSA using PSI were collected. After ideal position planning of the baseplate and screws, a PSI guide was 3D-printed. Postoperative CT evaluated baseplate version, inclination, and translation. Screw length, insertion angle, and potential penetration of the spinoglenoid and suprascapular notch were investigated. The mean differences between planned and actual implantation were 2.7° ± 5.8° for version, 0.9° ± 3.5° for inclination, and 1.0° ± 5.4° for rotation. The mean translation difference was 1.7 ± 1.0 mm. The mean screw angulation differences were -0.5° ± 6.4° anteroposteriorly and -1.4° ± 7.1° superior-inferiorly. There was no risk of nerve injury from suprascapular notch involvement because it was considered that the screw was positioned away from the nerve path. The posterior screw was abandoned in 93.3% of patients due to proximity to the suprascapular nerve or insufficient length for bone purchase (mean length: 9.3 ± 2.0 mm). Using PSI, the reproducibility of baseplate and screw placement in rTSA was confirmed. The posterior screw has a limited role due to its length and direction constraints. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative planning and PSI enable precise surgery, including proper screw insertion and baseplate positioning.

使用3D打印患者专用器械评估反向全肩关节置换术中底板位置和螺钉。
肩关节置换术中患者特异性内固定(PSI)已被用于将术前手术计划转化为精确的植入物定位。然而,使用PSI进行底板固定的螺钉尚未预先规划或验证其正确的位置和长度。本研究旨在评估3d打印PSI系统在反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)中用于底板和螺钉定位的可重复性以及术前螺钉计划的作用。收集了30例使用PSI进行原发性rTSA的患者的术后CT数据。在对底板和螺钉进行理想位置规划后,3d打印PSI导轨。术后CT评估底板的形态、倾斜度和移位。研究螺钉长度、插入角度以及棘突和肩胛上切迹的潜在穿透。计划植入与实际植入的平均差异为版本2.7°±5.8°,倾角0.9°±3.5°,旋转1.0°±5.4°。平均平移差为1.7±1.0 mm。平均螺钉角度差异为-0.5°±6.4°前后和-1.4°±7.1°上下。肩胛上切迹受累者没有神经损伤的风险,因为我们认为螺钉的位置远离神经通路。93.3%的患者由于靠近肩胛上神经或购买骨的长度不足(平均长度:9.3±2.0 mm)而放弃使用后路螺钉。使用PSI,证实了rTSA中基板和螺钉放置的重复性。后螺钉由于其长度和方向的限制作用有限。临床意义:术前计划和PSI可以精确手术,包括正确的螺钉插入和底板定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信