What Are the Experiences of Adults With ADHD of Engaging in ADHD Medication Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Laura Reeves, Anna Tickle
{"title":"What Are the Experiences of Adults With ADHD of Engaging in ADHD Medication Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Laura Reeves, Anna Tickle","doi":"10.1177/10870547251349952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review aimed to systematically review and synthesize qualitative evidence of the experiences of adults with ADHD who engage in stimulant medication treatment. A secondary aim was to establish the factors that influence adherence behavior regarding stimulant medication treatment for ADHD and appraise the quality of existing research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psych Info, Academic Search Complete, Embase, and Medline were searched between the 20th and 28th June 2024 for qualitative studies that explored the experiences of adults who had been prescribed stimulant medication for ADHD. A modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies and a meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven second-order constructs were identified from the 13 included papers (263 participants). Four third-order themes were identified: 1. Fitting in with society: Performance. 2. The impact of ADHD versus the side effects of stimulants. 3. Fitting in with society: Social functioning. 4. Difficulty accessing medication and specialist care. Further synthesis of these themes highlighted that access to a specialist doctor who was willing to \"tweak\" medication and dosage was both a key stimulus that triggered adherence behavior and a factor that influenced other stimuli for adherence behavior.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adults consistently found ADHD medications to be effective at reducing symptoms of ADHD, but their experience of taking the medications varied greatly due to the range of social, psychological, and physical side effects that could occur. All participants spoke about their experiences of taking ADHD medications in the context of \"fitting in\" with society: Being able to perform academically and in the workplace, as well as being able to meet familial and friendship obligations. However, \"fitting in\" could be both a motivation for adherence and non-adherence to medication. Societal perceptions and stigma around ADHD and ADHD medications was also discussed as important context regarding \"fitting in\" and medication adherence. When the results were viewed through the lens of the Health Belief Model, it was highlighted that the four themes identified could be considered stimuli for adherence behavior. A potential methodical limitation of the review was the weighted synthesis approach, which prevented themes being generated from lower quality, less relevant studies. However this approach could also be considered a strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251349952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251349952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This review aimed to systematically review and synthesize qualitative evidence of the experiences of adults with ADHD who engage in stimulant medication treatment. A secondary aim was to establish the factors that influence adherence behavior regarding stimulant medication treatment for ADHD and appraise the quality of existing research.

Methods: Psych Info, Academic Search Complete, Embase, and Medline were searched between the 20th and 28th June 2024 for qualitative studies that explored the experiences of adults who had been prescribed stimulant medication for ADHD. A modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies and a meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesize the results.

Results: Forty-seven second-order constructs were identified from the 13 included papers (263 participants). Four third-order themes were identified: 1. Fitting in with society: Performance. 2. The impact of ADHD versus the side effects of stimulants. 3. Fitting in with society: Social functioning. 4. Difficulty accessing medication and specialist care. Further synthesis of these themes highlighted that access to a specialist doctor who was willing to "tweak" medication and dosage was both a key stimulus that triggered adherence behavior and a factor that influenced other stimuli for adherence behavior.

Discussion: Adults consistently found ADHD medications to be effective at reducing symptoms of ADHD, but their experience of taking the medications varied greatly due to the range of social, psychological, and physical side effects that could occur. All participants spoke about their experiences of taking ADHD medications in the context of "fitting in" with society: Being able to perform academically and in the workplace, as well as being able to meet familial and friendship obligations. However, "fitting in" could be both a motivation for adherence and non-adherence to medication. Societal perceptions and stigma around ADHD and ADHD medications was also discussed as important context regarding "fitting in" and medication adherence. When the results were viewed through the lens of the Health Belief Model, it was highlighted that the four themes identified could be considered stimuli for adherence behavior. A potential methodical limitation of the review was the weighted synthesis approach, which prevented themes being generated from lower quality, less relevant studies. However this approach could also be considered a strength.

成人ADHD患者参与ADHD药物治疗的经验是什么?系统回顾与元民族志。
背景:本综述旨在系统回顾和综合成人ADHD患者接受兴奋剂治疗的定性证据。第二个目的是确定影响ADHD兴奋剂药物治疗依从性行为的因素,并评估现有研究的质量。方法:在2024年6月20日至28日期间,检索Psych Info, Academic Search Complete, Embase和Medline,以进行定性研究,探讨处方兴奋剂治疗ADHD的成年人的经历。采用改良的关键评估技能程序检查表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,并采用元人种学方法综合结果。结果:从纳入的13篇论文(263名参与者)中确定了47个二级构念。确定了四个第三级主题:1。适应社会:表现。ADHD的影响与兴奋剂的副作用。3. 适应社会:社会功能。4. 难以获得药物治疗和专科护理。这些主题的进一步综合强调,获得愿意“调整”药物和剂量的专科医生既是触发依从性行为的关键刺激因素,也是影响依从性行为的其他刺激因素的因素。讨论:成年人一致认为ADHD药物对减轻ADHD症状有效,但由于可能发生的社会、心理和身体副作用的范围,他们服用药物的经历差异很大。所有参与者都谈到了他们在“融入”社会的背景下服用ADHD药物的经历:能够在学业和工作中表现良好,以及能够履行家庭和友谊的义务。然而,“适应”既可能是坚持服药的动机,也可能是不坚持服药的动机。关于多动症和多动症药物的社会观念和耻辱也被作为“适应”和药物依从性的重要背景进行了讨论。当结果通过健康信念模型的镜头来看时,它被强调指出,确定的四个主题可以被认为是依从性行为的刺激。该综述在方法上的一个潜在限制是加权综合方法,它阻止了从质量较低、相关性较低的研究中产生主题。然而,这种方法也可以被认为是一种优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信