Acceptability of a Web-Based Financial Education Intervention for Latino Caregivers: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Susanna Mage, Donna Benton, Kathleen Wilber, Rocio Aguila Rodriguez, David Silva, Alexander Gonzalez, Frank Puga, Kylie Meyer
{"title":"Acceptability of a Web-Based Financial Education Intervention for Latino Caregivers: Mixed Methods Evaluation.","authors":"Susanna Mage, Donna Benton, Kathleen Wilber, Rocio Aguila Rodriguez, David Silva, Alexander Gonzalez, Frank Puga, Kylie Meyer","doi":"10.2196/70471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia face distinct financial challenges, spending nearly half of their annual household income on caregiving expenses, almost twice as much as non-Latino caregivers. Cultural norms, limited access to financial resources, and underrepresentation in intervention research compound this economic burden. There remains a critical gap in evidence-based, culturally tailored programs designed to reduce financial stress among Latino caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the acceptability and perceived value of the Confidently Navigating Financial Decisions and Enhancing Financial Well-Being in Dementia Caregiving (CONFIDENCE) program, a culturally tailored, web-based psychoeducational intervention designed to reduce financial stress and improve financial well-being among Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied a multimethod approach to evaluate the acceptability of the CONFIDENCE pilot. Following completion, 14 caregivers participated in in-depth, semistructured interviews, and 27 (39% of program participants) completed a 14-item satisfaction survey. The study was guided by a theoretical framework of acceptability composed of 7 domains: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Interview transcripts were analyzed independently by 4 coders (SM, RAR, DS, and KM) using thematic analysis, and survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants overall reported satisfaction with the CONFIDENCE program. Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts revealed four themes: (1) the perceived need for financial intervention; (2) perceived intervention effectiveness, particularly in improving financial knowledge, communication skills, and mental health; (3) positive emotional responses to participation, with high praise for the program's group setting and cultural relevance; and (4) recommendations for intervention improvement, including shorter sessions and technology support. Survey results confirmed high acceptability, with 96% (n=26) of respondents reporting they enjoyed the program. All participants (n=27, 100%) said they would recommend CONFIDENCE to other Latino caregivers. Participants reported improved awareness of available resources, increased confidence in financial decision-making, and reduced financial stress. Caregivers appreciated the group setting, which allowed for mutual interaction and learning; discussions fostered emotional connection and peer learning. Participants praised the content's trustworthiness and relevance. Although most agreed that participation required minimal effort, barriers such as time constraints and technology challenges were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that CONFIDENCE is acceptable among Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia. Culturally tailored content, group learning, and an emphasis on practical financial strategies were central to the program's success. Findings will inform program refinements, including limiting burden by addressing barriers while maintaining strengths such as group learning to optimize engagement. Considering the unique economic burdens Latino caregivers face, it is vital to develop and support interventions tailored to their unique needs. This study adds to the limited but growing literature on financial well-being interventions for Latino caregivers and highlights the value of culturally informed, community-driven approaches to supporting caregiver financial resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e70471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia face distinct financial challenges, spending nearly half of their annual household income on caregiving expenses, almost twice as much as non-Latino caregivers. Cultural norms, limited access to financial resources, and underrepresentation in intervention research compound this economic burden. There remains a critical gap in evidence-based, culturally tailored programs designed to reduce financial stress among Latino caregivers.

Objective: This study examines the acceptability and perceived value of the Confidently Navigating Financial Decisions and Enhancing Financial Well-Being in Dementia Caregiving (CONFIDENCE) program, a culturally tailored, web-based psychoeducational intervention designed to reduce financial stress and improve financial well-being among Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia.

Methods: We applied a multimethod approach to evaluate the acceptability of the CONFIDENCE pilot. Following completion, 14 caregivers participated in in-depth, semistructured interviews, and 27 (39% of program participants) completed a 14-item satisfaction survey. The study was guided by a theoretical framework of acceptability composed of 7 domains: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Interview transcripts were analyzed independently by 4 coders (SM, RAR, DS, and KM) using thematic analysis, and survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: Participants overall reported satisfaction with the CONFIDENCE program. Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts revealed four themes: (1) the perceived need for financial intervention; (2) perceived intervention effectiveness, particularly in improving financial knowledge, communication skills, and mental health; (3) positive emotional responses to participation, with high praise for the program's group setting and cultural relevance; and (4) recommendations for intervention improvement, including shorter sessions and technology support. Survey results confirmed high acceptability, with 96% (n=26) of respondents reporting they enjoyed the program. All participants (n=27, 100%) said they would recommend CONFIDENCE to other Latino caregivers. Participants reported improved awareness of available resources, increased confidence in financial decision-making, and reduced financial stress. Caregivers appreciated the group setting, which allowed for mutual interaction and learning; discussions fostered emotional connection and peer learning. Participants praised the content's trustworthiness and relevance. Although most agreed that participation required minimal effort, barriers such as time constraints and technology challenges were noted.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that CONFIDENCE is acceptable among Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia. Culturally tailored content, group learning, and an emphasis on practical financial strategies were central to the program's success. Findings will inform program refinements, including limiting burden by addressing barriers while maintaining strengths such as group learning to optimize engagement. Considering the unique economic burdens Latino caregivers face, it is vital to develop and support interventions tailored to their unique needs. This study adds to the limited but growing literature on financial well-being interventions for Latino caregivers and highlights the value of culturally informed, community-driven approaches to supporting caregiver financial resilience.

拉丁裔照护者网上金融教育干预的可接受性:混合方法评估。
背景:痴呆症患者的拉丁裔照顾者面临着明显的经济挑战,他们将家庭年收入的近一半用于照顾费用,几乎是非拉丁裔照顾者的两倍。文化规范、获得财政资源的机会有限以及干预研究中代表性不足加剧了这一经济负担。在以证据为基础,根据文化量身定制的旨在减轻拉丁裔护理人员财务压力的项目中,仍存在重大差距。目的:本研究考察了在痴呆症护理中自信地导航财务决策和增强财务福祉(CONFIDENCE)计划的可接受性和感知价值,这是一项基于文化的基于网络的心理教育干预,旨在减轻拉丁裔痴呆症患者护理人员的财务压力和改善财务福祉。方法:我们采用多方法来评估CONFIDENCE试点的可接受性。完成后,14名护理人员参加了深入的半结构化访谈,27名(占项目参与者的39%)完成了14项满意度调查。本研究以可接受性的理论框架为指导,可接受性由7个领域组成:情感态度、负担、伦理、干预一致性、机会成本、感知有效性和自我效能。访谈记录由4位编码员(SM、RAR、DS和KM)采用主题分析独立分析,调查结果采用描述性统计进行汇总。结果:参与者总体报告了对CONFIDENCE计划的满意度。访谈记录的定性分析揭示了四个主题:(1)财务干预的感知需求;(2)感知干预效果,特别是在提高金融知识、沟通技巧和心理健康方面;(3)积极的参与情绪反应,对项目的群体设置和文化相关性给予高度评价;(4)改进干预措施的建议,包括缩短疗程和技术支持。调查结果证实了较高的可接受性,96% (n=26)的受访者表示他们喜欢该计划。所有参与者(n= 27,100%)表示他们会向其他拉丁裔护理人员推荐CONFIDENCE。参与者报告说,他们提高了对现有资源的认识,增强了对财务决策的信心,减轻了财务压力。照顾者欣赏小组设置,允许相互互动和学习;讨论促进了情感联系和同侪学习。参与者称赞了内容的可信度和相关性。虽然大多数人同意参与所需的努力最少,但也注意到时间限制和技术挑战等障碍。结论:研究结果表明,拉丁裔痴呆症患者的护理人员可以接受CONFIDENCE。根据不同文化量身定制的内容、小组学习以及强调实用的财务策略是该项目成功的关键。研究结果将为改进项目提供信息,包括通过解决障碍来减少负担,同时保持小组学习等优势,以优化参与。考虑到拉丁裔护理人员面临的独特经济负担,制定和支持针对其独特需求的干预措施至关重要。本研究补充了有限但不断增长的关于拉丁裔护理人员财务健康干预的文献,并强调了文化知情,社区驱动的方法对支持护理人员财务弹性的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信