Sedative co-medication patterns across frailty states in people with HIV: a network-based study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Henry Ukachukwu Michael, Marie-Josée Brouillette, Robyn Tamblyn, Lesley K Fellows, Nancy E Mayo
{"title":"Sedative co-medication patterns across frailty states in people with HIV: a network-based study.","authors":"Henry Ukachukwu Michael, Marie-Josée Brouillette, Robyn Tamblyn, Lesley K Fellows, Nancy E Mayo","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01963-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with HIV are living longer, but frailty may increase vulnerability to adverse drug interactions, particularly with sedative medications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe sedative co-medication patterns across frailty states using network-based analysis, and to identify key medications driving interaction complexity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed 321 participants using sedatives from the Positive Brain Health Now Cohort (mean age: 53 years), categorized as robust (30.2%), prefrail (47.0%), or frail (22.7%). Sedative use was classified using the Sedative Load Model, and frailty was assessed with a modified Fried Frailty Phenotype. Co-medication networks were constructed for robust, prefrail, and frail groups, with metrics such as Neighborhood Shift Scores (NESH) and ΔBetweenness used to evaluate network dynamics. Edge-level Observed-to-Expected ratios highlighted significant drug pairings and interaction risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frail individuals exhibited the most interconnected sedative network (graph density: 0.24; average degree: 7.31) followed by prefrail (graph density: 0.18; average degree: 6.67) and robust groups (graph density: 0.13; average degree: 4.61). Medications with high network influence included mirtazapine (robust-to-prefrail: NESH = 2.05; ΔBetweenness = 0.23), gabapentin (robust-to-frail: NESH = 2.46, ΔBetweenness = 0.10), and pregabalin (prefrail-to-frail: NESH = 2.55; ΔBetweenness = 0.71). High-risk sedative pairs in frail individuals included hydromorphone-clonazepam (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 3.07; interaction severity: D), amitriptyline-oxycodone (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 1.92; severity: D), and quetiapine-citalopram (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 2.12; severity: D). Prefrail individuals had intermediate-risk combinations, including clobazam-levetiracetam (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 81.5; severity: C), and gabapentin-hydroxyzine (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 3.58; severity: D). Robust individuals showed fewer and lower-risk patterns, such as amitriptyline-pregabalin (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 4.00; severity: C). Network differences reflect increasing polypharmacy and adverse interaction risks with advancing frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sedative co-medication patterns vary meaningfully across frailty states in people with HIV. Frailty is associated with more complex networks and a greater likelihood of high-risk drug interactions. Medications influencing these patterns can help identify opportunities for safer prescribing. The prefrail stage may offer a timely window for interventions aimed at minimizing polypharmacy and improving safety in middle-aged and older adults with HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01963-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with HIV are living longer, but frailty may increase vulnerability to adverse drug interactions, particularly with sedative medications.

Aim: To describe sedative co-medication patterns across frailty states using network-based analysis, and to identify key medications driving interaction complexity.

Method: This cross-sectional study analyzed 321 participants using sedatives from the Positive Brain Health Now Cohort (mean age: 53 years), categorized as robust (30.2%), prefrail (47.0%), or frail (22.7%). Sedative use was classified using the Sedative Load Model, and frailty was assessed with a modified Fried Frailty Phenotype. Co-medication networks were constructed for robust, prefrail, and frail groups, with metrics such as Neighborhood Shift Scores (NESH) and ΔBetweenness used to evaluate network dynamics. Edge-level Observed-to-Expected ratios highlighted significant drug pairings and interaction risks.

Results: Frail individuals exhibited the most interconnected sedative network (graph density: 0.24; average degree: 7.31) followed by prefrail (graph density: 0.18; average degree: 6.67) and robust groups (graph density: 0.13; average degree: 4.61). Medications with high network influence included mirtazapine (robust-to-prefrail: NESH = 2.05; ΔBetweenness = 0.23), gabapentin (robust-to-frail: NESH = 2.46, ΔBetweenness = 0.10), and pregabalin (prefrail-to-frail: NESH = 2.55; ΔBetweenness = 0.71). High-risk sedative pairs in frail individuals included hydromorphone-clonazepam (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 3.07; interaction severity: D), amitriptyline-oxycodone (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 1.92; severity: D), and quetiapine-citalopram (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 2.12; severity: D). Prefrail individuals had intermediate-risk combinations, including clobazam-levetiracetam (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 81.5; severity: C), and gabapentin-hydroxyzine (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 3.58; severity: D). Robust individuals showed fewer and lower-risk patterns, such as amitriptyline-pregabalin (Observed-to-Expected ratio: 4.00; severity: C). Network differences reflect increasing polypharmacy and adverse interaction risks with advancing frailty.

Conclusion: Sedative co-medication patterns vary meaningfully across frailty states in people with HIV. Frailty is associated with more complex networks and a greater likelihood of high-risk drug interactions. Medications influencing these patterns can help identify opportunities for safer prescribing. The prefrail stage may offer a timely window for interventions aimed at minimizing polypharmacy and improving safety in middle-aged and older adults with HIV.

艾滋病毒感染者虚弱状态下的镇静联合用药模式:一项基于网络的研究。
艾滋病毒感染者的寿命更长,但身体虚弱可能会增加对药物不良反应的脆弱性,特别是与镇静药物的相互作用。目的:利用基于网络的分析来描述衰弱状态下的镇静联合用药模式,并确定驱动相互作用复杂性的关键药物。方法:这项横断面研究分析了321名使用镇静剂的参与者,这些参与者来自积极的大脑健康队列(平均年龄:53岁),分为健壮(30.2%)、易弱(47.0%)和虚弱(22.7%)。使用镇静负荷模型对镇静剂的使用进行分类,并用改良的Fried脆弱表型评估脆弱性。我们为健全人、体弱者和体弱者构建了联合用药网络,并使用邻里转移评分(NESH)和ΔBetweenness等指标来评估网络动态。边缘水平观察到的预期比突出了显著的药物配对和相互作用风险。结果:体弱个体表现出最相互关联的镇静网络(图密度:0.24;平均度:7.31),其次是预脆弱(图密度:0.18;平均度:6.67)和稳健组(图密度:0.13;平均学位:4.61)。具有高网络影响的药物包括米氮平(稳健性-易患性:NESH = 2.05;ΔBetweenness = 0.23),加巴喷丁(健壮到虚弱:NESH = 2.46, ΔBetweenness = 0.10)和普瑞巴林(健壮到虚弱:NESH = 2.55;ΔBetweenness = 0.71)。体弱个体的高危镇静组合包括氢吗啡酮-氯硝西泮(观察预期比:3.07;相互作用严重程度:D)、阿米替林-羟考酮(观察预期比:1.92;严重性:D)和喹硫平-西酞普兰(观察预期比:2.12;严重性:D)。体弱前个体有中等风险组合,包括氯巴唑-左乙拉西坦(观察预期比:81.5;严重程度:C),加巴喷丁-羟嗪(观察预期比:3.58;严重性:D)。健康个体表现出较少和较低的风险模式,如阿米替林-普瑞巴林(观察预期比:4.00;严重性:C)。网络差异反映了越来越多的药物和不利的相互作用风险与推进脆弱。结论:镇静联合用药模式在HIV感染者虚弱状态中存在显著差异。虚弱与更复杂的网络和高风险药物相互作用的可能性更大有关。影响这些模式的药物可以帮助确定更安全处方的机会。虚弱前期可能为干预提供了一个及时的窗口,旨在最大限度地减少多种药物治疗,提高中老年人艾滋病毒感染者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信