Effect of Intracanal Medicament Type on Postoperative Pain - A Prospective Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Manal J Almaslamani, Mohamed H El Mesmari, Shamim M Ismail
{"title":"Effect of Intracanal Medicament Type on Postoperative Pain - A Prospective Study.","authors":"Manal J Almaslamani, Mohamed H El Mesmari, Shamim M Ismail","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_777_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to comparatively evaluate the ability of Ledemix and non-setting calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments to reduce postoperative pain in teeth undergoing root canal treatment (RCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted at Ajman University College of Dentistry, involving 59 patients requiring RCT on maxillary and mandibular first molars. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 received Ledermix paste, while Group 2 received non-setting calcium hydroxide paste. Treatments were performed by supervised fifth-year dental students using standardised aseptic techniques. Local anesthesia was administered, and rubber dam isolation was ensured. After access cavity preparation, root canals were instrumented using WaveOne Gold Files with sodium hypochlorite irrigation. The assigned intracanal medicament was placed, and the cavity was sealed with a temporary restoration. Pain levels were assessed preoperatively and at 4 h and 4 days postoperatively using a visual analogue scale by a blinded investigator. Clinical and demographic data, including age, gender, smoking status, medical history, and pulpal/periapical diagnoses, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analysed using SPSS 28.0. T-tests were used to compare pain levels between groups, with significance set at P < 0.05. The average pain score decreased significantly from 3.95 ± 0.52 preoperatively to 1.47 ± 0.30 at 4 h and 0.42 ± 0.18 at 4 days postoperatively (P = 0.001). Ledermix was associated with greater pain reduction at 4 h (P = 0.004), no significant differences between groups were observed at 4 days (P = 0.665).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both medicaments effectively reduced pain, with Ledermix offering superior early relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_777_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim was to comparatively evaluate the ability of Ledemix and non-setting calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments to reduce postoperative pain in teeth undergoing root canal treatment (RCT).

Materials and methods: A single-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial was conducted at Ajman University College of Dentistry, involving 59 patients requiring RCT on maxillary and mandibular first molars. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 received Ledermix paste, while Group 2 received non-setting calcium hydroxide paste. Treatments were performed by supervised fifth-year dental students using standardised aseptic techniques. Local anesthesia was administered, and rubber dam isolation was ensured. After access cavity preparation, root canals were instrumented using WaveOne Gold Files with sodium hypochlorite irrigation. The assigned intracanal medicament was placed, and the cavity was sealed with a temporary restoration. Pain levels were assessed preoperatively and at 4 h and 4 days postoperatively using a visual analogue scale by a blinded investigator. Clinical and demographic data, including age, gender, smoking status, medical history, and pulpal/periapical diagnoses, were recorded.

Results: Data were analysed using SPSS 28.0. T-tests were used to compare pain levels between groups, with significance set at P < 0.05. The average pain score decreased significantly from 3.95 ± 0.52 preoperatively to 1.47 ± 0.30 at 4 h and 0.42 ± 0.18 at 4 days postoperatively (P = 0.001). Ledermix was associated with greater pain reduction at 4 h (P = 0.004), no significant differences between groups were observed at 4 days (P = 0.665).

Conclusion: Both medicaments effectively reduced pain, with Ledermix offering superior early relief.

肛管内用药类型对术后疼痛影响的前瞻性研究。
目的:比较评价Ledemix与不固定氢氧化钙管内药物对根管治疗牙齿术后疼痛的缓解作用(RCT)。材料与方法:在Ajman大学牙科学院进行了一项单盲、随机对照临床试验,涉及59例上颌和下颌第一磨牙的随机对照试验。患者随机分为两组:第一组使用Ledermix膏剂,第二组使用不凝固的氢氧化钙膏剂。治疗由监督的五年级牙科学生使用标准化无菌技术进行。局部麻醉,橡胶坝隔离。根管预备后,使用WaveOne金锉进行根管预备,次氯酸钠冲洗。放置指定的管内药物,并暂时修复封闭腔体。术前、术后4小时和4天,由盲法研究者使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛水平。记录临床和人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、吸烟状况、病史和牙髓/根尖周诊断。结果:数据采用SPSS 28.0进行分析。组间疼痛程度比较采用t检验,P < 0.05为显著性。平均疼痛评分由术前的3.95±0.52分降至术后4 h的1.47±0.30分和术后4 d的0.42±0.18分(P = 0.001)。Ledermix与4小时疼痛减轻程度相关(P = 0.004), 4天各组间无显著差异(P = 0.665)。结论:两种药物均能有效减轻疼痛,其中Ledermix具有较好的早期缓解作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Indian Journal of Dental Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信