Normative Reference Values for Pharyngeal Volume and Residue During Swallowing in Healthy Adults: Analysis Using 320-Row Area Detector Computed Tomography.
{"title":"Normative Reference Values for Pharyngeal Volume and Residue During Swallowing in Healthy Adults: Analysis Using 320-Row Area Detector Computed Tomography.","authors":"Howell Henrian Bayona, Yoko Inamoto, Eiichi Saitoh, Keiko Aihara, Seiko Shibata, Yohei Otaka","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10855-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to establish reference values for quantitative measurements of pharyngeal volume and residue during swallowing in healthy individuals and to examine how these measurements are influenced by age, sex, height, and bolus properties. We performed a retrospective analysis of 288 swallows from 135 healthy Japanese adults (median age, 43 years; height, 163 cm) who underwent Swallowing CT. Test boluses included thin or extremely thick liquids in either 3 mL, 10 mL, or 20 mL amounts. Pharyngeal cavity volume at bolus hold (PVHOLD), unobliterated air and bolus volume at maximum pharyngeal constriction (PVMAX), and pharyngeal volume constriction ratio (PVCR), and post-swallow pharyngeal residue were measured on dynamic 3D-CT images using a semi-automated software. We determined the 2.5th, 50th, 97.5th percentile values to obtain normative reference values for each parameter and made generalized linear regression models to determine how these volume measurements are associated with demographic factors and bolus properties. Normative values (median [97.5th percentile]) across all swallows were PVHOLD 20.9 cm<sup>3</sup> [38.6 cm<sup>3</sup>], PVMAX 0.3 cm<sup>3</sup> [2.1 cm<sup>3</sup>], PVCR 98.8% [2.5th percentile 89.1%], and residue 0 cm<sup>3</sup> [0.4 cm<sup>3</sup>]. Males exhibited larger values than females. PVHOLD significantly increased with height (β = 0.465, p < 0.001) and age (β = 0.068, p = 0.001), while PVMAX and PVCR increased with larger bolus volumes (β = 0.293, p = 0.005) and in thicker consistencies (β = 0.376, p = 0.017). Pharyngeal residue was present in 98/288 (34.0%) of swallows and was significantly associated with increasing bolus volume (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.865 [95% confidence interval: 1.275-2.727]), age (aOR = 1.025 [1.010-1.040]), thicker bolus (aOR = 1.806 [1.275-2.727]). Each 1 cm<sup>2</sup> increase in PVMAX was associated with nearly double the odds of residue (aOR = 1.86 [1.202-2.862]). Similarly, each 1% decrease in PVCR corresponded to a 10.6% increase in the odds of residue (aOR = 1.106 [1.015-1.295]). These normative data provide a bases for comparing individuals with or without pharyngeal impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10855-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to establish reference values for quantitative measurements of pharyngeal volume and residue during swallowing in healthy individuals and to examine how these measurements are influenced by age, sex, height, and bolus properties. We performed a retrospective analysis of 288 swallows from 135 healthy Japanese adults (median age, 43 years; height, 163 cm) who underwent Swallowing CT. Test boluses included thin or extremely thick liquids in either 3 mL, 10 mL, or 20 mL amounts. Pharyngeal cavity volume at bolus hold (PVHOLD), unobliterated air and bolus volume at maximum pharyngeal constriction (PVMAX), and pharyngeal volume constriction ratio (PVCR), and post-swallow pharyngeal residue were measured on dynamic 3D-CT images using a semi-automated software. We determined the 2.5th, 50th, 97.5th percentile values to obtain normative reference values for each parameter and made generalized linear regression models to determine how these volume measurements are associated with demographic factors and bolus properties. Normative values (median [97.5th percentile]) across all swallows were PVHOLD 20.9 cm3 [38.6 cm3], PVMAX 0.3 cm3 [2.1 cm3], PVCR 98.8% [2.5th percentile 89.1%], and residue 0 cm3 [0.4 cm3]. Males exhibited larger values than females. PVHOLD significantly increased with height (β = 0.465, p < 0.001) and age (β = 0.068, p = 0.001), while PVMAX and PVCR increased with larger bolus volumes (β = 0.293, p = 0.005) and in thicker consistencies (β = 0.376, p = 0.017). Pharyngeal residue was present in 98/288 (34.0%) of swallows and was significantly associated with increasing bolus volume (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.865 [95% confidence interval: 1.275-2.727]), age (aOR = 1.025 [1.010-1.040]), thicker bolus (aOR = 1.806 [1.275-2.727]). Each 1 cm2 increase in PVMAX was associated with nearly double the odds of residue (aOR = 1.86 [1.202-2.862]). Similarly, each 1% decrease in PVCR corresponded to a 10.6% increase in the odds of residue (aOR = 1.106 [1.015-1.295]). These normative data provide a bases for comparing individuals with or without pharyngeal impairments.
期刊介绍:
Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.