Bioelectrical impedance analysis instruments: how do they differ, what do we need for clinical assessment?

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yves M Dupertuis, Wedali Jimaja, Cheryle Beardsley Levoy, Laurence Genton
{"title":"Bioelectrical impedance analysis instruments: how do they differ, what do we need for clinical assessment?","authors":"Yves M Dupertuis, Wedali Jimaja, Cheryle Beardsley Levoy, Laurence Genton","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used, noninvasive method for assessing body composition. Recent technological advances have diversified BIA devices in terms of measurement frequency, electrode configuration, and portability. This review outlines key criteria for selecting a BIA system according to clinical or research needs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Single-frequency BIA (SF-BIA) devices, typically consumer-grade with hand-to-hand or foot-to-foot configurations, are affordable and easy to use but often lack raw data access, clinical validation, and regulatory certification. In contrast, multifrequency BIA (MF-BIA) systems, especially octopolar models, enable segmental analysis and provide greater accuracy for evaluating fluid distribution and lean mass. However, they are costlier, depend on proprietary algorithms, and generally require standing measurements. In hospital settings, portable MF-BIA devices that allow supine, tetrapolar or octopolar assessments are preferable, particularly for use with bedridden patients. Across all contexts, standardized measurement protocols and access to raw parameters ( Z , R , Xc, PhA) are essential to apply accurate, population-specific predictive equations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Reliable use of BIA requires careful consideration of device type, data accessibility, and methodological consistency. Portable, regulatory-certified MF-BIA systems with tetrapolar or octopolar configurations and access to raw data offer the most accurate and adaptable solutions for clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used, noninvasive method for assessing body composition. Recent technological advances have diversified BIA devices in terms of measurement frequency, electrode configuration, and portability. This review outlines key criteria for selecting a BIA system according to clinical or research needs.

Recent findings: Single-frequency BIA (SF-BIA) devices, typically consumer-grade with hand-to-hand or foot-to-foot configurations, are affordable and easy to use but often lack raw data access, clinical validation, and regulatory certification. In contrast, multifrequency BIA (MF-BIA) systems, especially octopolar models, enable segmental analysis and provide greater accuracy for evaluating fluid distribution and lean mass. However, they are costlier, depend on proprietary algorithms, and generally require standing measurements. In hospital settings, portable MF-BIA devices that allow supine, tetrapolar or octopolar assessments are preferable, particularly for use with bedridden patients. Across all contexts, standardized measurement protocols and access to raw parameters ( Z , R , Xc, PhA) are essential to apply accurate, population-specific predictive equations.

Summary: Reliable use of BIA requires careful consideration of device type, data accessibility, and methodological consistency. Portable, regulatory-certified MF-BIA systems with tetrapolar or octopolar configurations and access to raw data offer the most accurate and adaptable solutions for clinical and research applications.

生物电阻抗分析仪器:它们有何不同,临床评估需要什么?
综述目的:生物电阻抗分析(BIA)是一种广泛应用的无创身体成分评估方法。最近的技术进步使BIA设备在测量频率、电极配置和便携性方面多样化。这篇综述概述了根据临床或研究需要选择BIA系统的关键标准。最近的发现:单频BIA (SF-BIA)设备,通常是消费者级的手对手或脚对脚配置,价格合理且易于使用,但通常缺乏原始数据访问、临床验证和监管认证。相比之下,多频率BIA (MF-BIA)系统,特别是章鱼模型,可以进行分段分析,并提供更高的准确性来评估流体分布和瘦质量。然而,它们更昂贵,依赖于专有算法,并且通常需要站立测量。在医院环境中,可进行仰卧位、四极位或八足位评估的便携式MF-BIA设备是优选的,特别是用于卧床不起的患者。在所有情况下,标准化的测量方案和获取原始参数(Z、R、Xc、PhA)对于应用准确的、特定人群的预测方程至关重要。总结:BIA的可靠使用需要仔细考虑设备类型、数据可访问性和方法一致性。便携式,经监管机构认证的MF-BIA系统具有四极或八极配置,并可访问原始数据,为临床和研究应用提供最准确和适应性最强的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信