Yves M Dupertuis, Wedali Jimaja, Cheryle Beardsley Levoy, Laurence Genton
{"title":"Bioelectrical impedance analysis instruments: how do they differ, what do we need for clinical assessment?","authors":"Yves M Dupertuis, Wedali Jimaja, Cheryle Beardsley Levoy, Laurence Genton","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used, noninvasive method for assessing body composition. Recent technological advances have diversified BIA devices in terms of measurement frequency, electrode configuration, and portability. This review outlines key criteria for selecting a BIA system according to clinical or research needs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Single-frequency BIA (SF-BIA) devices, typically consumer-grade with hand-to-hand or foot-to-foot configurations, are affordable and easy to use but often lack raw data access, clinical validation, and regulatory certification. In contrast, multifrequency BIA (MF-BIA) systems, especially octopolar models, enable segmental analysis and provide greater accuracy for evaluating fluid distribution and lean mass. However, they are costlier, depend on proprietary algorithms, and generally require standing measurements. In hospital settings, portable MF-BIA devices that allow supine, tetrapolar or octopolar assessments are preferable, particularly for use with bedridden patients. Across all contexts, standardized measurement protocols and access to raw parameters ( Z , R , Xc, PhA) are essential to apply accurate, population-specific predictive equations.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Reliable use of BIA requires careful consideration of device type, data accessibility, and methodological consistency. Portable, regulatory-certified MF-BIA systems with tetrapolar or octopolar configurations and access to raw data offer the most accurate and adaptable solutions for clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used, noninvasive method for assessing body composition. Recent technological advances have diversified BIA devices in terms of measurement frequency, electrode configuration, and portability. This review outlines key criteria for selecting a BIA system according to clinical or research needs.
Recent findings: Single-frequency BIA (SF-BIA) devices, typically consumer-grade with hand-to-hand or foot-to-foot configurations, are affordable and easy to use but often lack raw data access, clinical validation, and regulatory certification. In contrast, multifrequency BIA (MF-BIA) systems, especially octopolar models, enable segmental analysis and provide greater accuracy for evaluating fluid distribution and lean mass. However, they are costlier, depend on proprietary algorithms, and generally require standing measurements. In hospital settings, portable MF-BIA devices that allow supine, tetrapolar or octopolar assessments are preferable, particularly for use with bedridden patients. Across all contexts, standardized measurement protocols and access to raw parameters ( Z , R , Xc, PhA) are essential to apply accurate, population-specific predictive equations.
Summary: Reliable use of BIA requires careful consideration of device type, data accessibility, and methodological consistency. Portable, regulatory-certified MF-BIA systems with tetrapolar or octopolar configurations and access to raw data offer the most accurate and adaptable solutions for clinical and research applications.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.