Posterior conduit fixation with retroperitonealization of uretero-ileal anastomosis after open radical cystectomy reduces the postoperative complication rate: a retrospective, matched-paired single-center analysis.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vukovic Marko, Kavaric Petar, Magdelinic Aleksandar, Albijanic Marko, Rebronja Almir, Sabovic Eldin
{"title":"Posterior conduit fixation with retroperitonealization of uretero-ileal anastomosis after open radical cystectomy reduces the postoperative complication rate: a retrospective, matched-paired single-center analysis.","authors":"Vukovic Marko, Kavaric Petar, Magdelinic Aleksandar, Albijanic Marko, Rebronja Almir, Sabovic Eldin","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01869-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior conduit fixation with retroperitoneal ureteroileal anastomosis (UIA) in reducing perioperative complications after radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study, including 150 patients who underwent either modified IC technique (extraperitonealized anastomosis with posterior conduit fixation; n = 79) or the conventional IC technique (n = 71). The primary endpoints were the incidence of clinical parastomal hernia (PSH) and ileus. Secondary endpoints included operative time, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of early and late stoma- related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified group showed significantly lower incidence of both early and late postoperative complications, including ileus and PSH, compared to the conventional group (8.86% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.01 and 7.6% vs. 17%, p = 0.03, respectively) after a median follow-up of 34 months. Corresponding hazard ratios were 0.312 (95% CI: 0.047-0.798, p = 0.01) for early complications and 0.267 (95% CI: 0.105-0.611, p = 0.03) for late complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support our hypothesis that extraperitoneal ureteroileal anastomosis combined with posterior conduit fixation effectively reduces the risk of both early and late postoperative complications, including parastomal hernia and ileus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01869-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior conduit fixation with retroperitoneal ureteroileal anastomosis (UIA) in reducing perioperative complications after radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study, including 150 patients who underwent either modified IC technique (extraperitonealized anastomosis with posterior conduit fixation; n = 79) or the conventional IC technique (n = 71). The primary endpoints were the incidence of clinical parastomal hernia (PSH) and ileus. Secondary endpoints included operative time, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of early and late stoma- related complications.

Results: The modified group showed significantly lower incidence of both early and late postoperative complications, including ileus and PSH, compared to the conventional group (8.86% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.01 and 7.6% vs. 17%, p = 0.03, respectively) after a median follow-up of 34 months. Corresponding hazard ratios were 0.312 (95% CI: 0.047-0.798, p = 0.01) for early complications and 0.267 (95% CI: 0.105-0.611, p = 0.03) for late complications.

Conclusion: The results support our hypothesis that extraperitoneal ureteroileal anastomosis combined with posterior conduit fixation effectively reduces the risk of both early and late postoperative complications, including parastomal hernia and ileus.

开放性根治性膀胱切除术后输尿管回肠吻合术后导管固定降低术后并发症发生率:一项回顾性、配对单中心分析。
背景:本研究旨在评估经腹膜后输尿管油吻合术(UIA)后导管固定在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)伴回肠导管(IC)尿改道术后围手术期并发症的疗效。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,包括150例接受改良IC技术(腹膜外吻合后导管固定;n = 79)或常规IC技术(n = 71)。主要终点是临床造口旁疝(PSH)和肠梗阻的发生率。次要终点包括手术时间、术后并发症发生率和住院时间(LOS)。采用多变量logistic回归来确定早期和晚期造口相关并发症的预测因素。结果:中位随访34个月后,改良组术后早期和晚期并发症(包括肠梗阻和PSH)的发生率明显低于常规组(分别为8.86%比28.1%,p = 0.01和7.6%比17%,p = 0.03)。早期并发症的风险比为0.312 (95% CI: 0.047 ~ 0.798, p = 0.01),晚期并发症的风险比为0.267 (95% CI: 0.105 ~ 0.611, p = 0.03)。结论:腹膜外输尿管输尿管吻合术联合后导管固定术可有效降低造口旁疝、肠梗阻等术后早期和晚期并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信