The impact of cementing technique in polished taper fit hip stems : a modelling analysis of implant-cement interface.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Bernard H van Duren, Mohamad Taufiqurrakhman, Alison Jones, Mark Higgins, Andrew R Manktelow, Benjamin V Bloch, Hemant Pandit
{"title":"The impact of cementing technique in polished taper fit hip stems : a modelling analysis of implant-cement interface.","authors":"Bernard H van Duren, Mohamad Taufiqurrakhman, Alison Jones, Mark Higgins, Andrew R Manktelow, Benjamin V Bloch, Hemant Pandit","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.147.BJR-2024-0408.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cemented polished taper fit (PTF) stems are the femoral implant of choice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in many locations worldwide. There is increasing evidence that periprosthetic fracture may be the single major contributor to reoperation with these stems. The aim of this study was to demonstrate how mismatches at the implant-cement interface may occur and the subsequent effect of these incongruities on the contacting area and the forces transmitted to the cement mantle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parametric equation-based model was developed to determine the contact mismatch relative to axial stem rotations. This model was also used to calculate the restoration of contact surface area with stem subsidence for both a dual-taper and triple-taper geometry. A finite element analysis (FEA) was used to compare the effects of reduced contact area due to the incongruent hip implant-cement interface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The contact model showed a large decrease in surface contact area with even only a small rotation going from 100% at 0° to 50.00% at 2.5° for the dual-taper geometry, and from 100% at 0° to 50.20% at 2.5° for the triple-taper geometry. There was a gradual but small ongoing decrease in contact surface with increasing rotation for both the dual-taper and triple-taper geometries. For both taper designs, there was an increase in contact surface area with an increase in subsidence resulting in contact for up to a 5° mismatch being restored with 2 mm subsidence. FEA showed that with increasing mismatches and consequent contact area reduction, there was an increase in von Mises stress in the implant-cement interface of up to 235%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With increasing mismatch, there was an increase in maximum stresses, total strain, and subsidence in the cement mantle, highlighting the importance of achieving an optimal implant-cement interface at the time of implantation of cemented PTF femoral stems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"14 7","pages":"642-655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.147.BJR-2024-0408.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Cemented polished taper fit (PTF) stems are the femoral implant of choice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in many locations worldwide. There is increasing evidence that periprosthetic fracture may be the single major contributor to reoperation with these stems. The aim of this study was to demonstrate how mismatches at the implant-cement interface may occur and the subsequent effect of these incongruities on the contacting area and the forces transmitted to the cement mantle.

Methods: A parametric equation-based model was developed to determine the contact mismatch relative to axial stem rotations. This model was also used to calculate the restoration of contact surface area with stem subsidence for both a dual-taper and triple-taper geometry. A finite element analysis (FEA) was used to compare the effects of reduced contact area due to the incongruent hip implant-cement interface.

Results: The contact model showed a large decrease in surface contact area with even only a small rotation going from 100% at 0° to 50.00% at 2.5° for the dual-taper geometry, and from 100% at 0° to 50.20% at 2.5° for the triple-taper geometry. There was a gradual but small ongoing decrease in contact surface with increasing rotation for both the dual-taper and triple-taper geometries. For both taper designs, there was an increase in contact surface area with an increase in subsidence resulting in contact for up to a 5° mismatch being restored with 2 mm subsidence. FEA showed that with increasing mismatches and consequent contact area reduction, there was an increase in von Mises stress in the implant-cement interface of up to 235%.

Conclusion: With increasing mismatch, there was an increase in maximum stresses, total strain, and subsidence in the cement mantle, highlighting the importance of achieving an optimal implant-cement interface at the time of implantation of cemented PTF femoral stems.

固井技术对抛光锥形配合髋柄的影响:植入物-固井界面的建模分析。
目的:在全球许多地方,硬质磨光锥形配合(PTF)假体是全髋关节置换术(THA)的首选股骨假体。越来越多的证据表明,假体周围骨折可能是再手术的主要原因。本研究的目的是证明种植体-水泥界面的不匹配是如何发生的,以及这些不匹配对接触面积和传递到水泥地幔的力的后续影响。方法:建立基于参数方程的模型来确定相对于轴杆旋转的接触失配。该模型还用于计算双锥度和三锥度几何结构下的接触表面积恢复。采用有限元分析方法比较了假体-骨水泥界面不一致导致的接触面积减小的影响。结果:接触模型显示表面接触面积大幅减少,即使只有很小的旋转,对于双锥度几何形状,从0°的100%到2.5°的50.00%,对于三锥度几何形状,从0°的100%到2.5°的50.20%。对于双锥度和三锥度几何形状,随着旋转的增加,接触面逐渐减小,但减小幅度很小。对于两种锥度设计,随着下沉量的增加,接触表面积也会增加,从而在下沉2mm的情况下恢复5°不匹配的接触。有限元分析结果表明,随着失配的增加和接触面积的减小,种植体-水泥界面的von Mises应力增加了235%。结论:随着失配的增加,骨水泥覆盖层的最大应力、总应变和下沉也会增加,这突出了在骨水泥PTF股骨干植入时实现最佳骨水泥界面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信