The Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Utilization in Australasia: A Survey of Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia Members.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Yifei Zhu, Danyon Lo, Deme Karikos, Malinda Itchins, Annie Wong
{"title":"The Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Utilization in Australasia: A Survey of Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia Members.","authors":"Yifei Zhu, Danyon Lo, Deme Karikos, Malinda Itchins, Annie Wong","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the current status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) utilization for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among members of the Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia (TOGA), and to identify barriers to its implementation in clinical practice across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 31-item electronic survey was distributed to TOGA members between December 2023 and August 2024. Responses were analysed descriptively to assess access, usage patterns, perceived barriers, and clinician attitudes toward ctDNA testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty complete responses were analysed. Most respondents were medical oncologists working in metropolitan academic or public hospitals. While respondents estimated 83% of patients have access to molecular testing, only 12% were believed to have access to ctDNA testing. Only 33% reported routine ctDNA use, primarily in advanced disease settings. If more accessible, 83% indicated they would adopt ctDNA in advanced NSCLC. Key barriers to ctDNA utilization included cost (93%), logistical challenges (63%), limited knowledge (50%), and assay confidence (40%). Although over half of clinicians had patients inquire about ctDNA, fewer than 40% routinely discussed it. Most preferred are in-person or virtual workshops for education. Notably, 30% lacked access to a Molecular Tumor Board, and 70% did not provide pre-test counselling regarding incidental germline findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite limited current use, there is strong interest in ctDNA testing for NSCLC in ANZ. Addressing funding, logistical barriers, and clinician education is essential to enabling equitable, widespread adoption of ctDNA into standard lung cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e14215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the current status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) utilization for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among members of the Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia (TOGA), and to identify barriers to its implementation in clinical practice across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).

Methods: A 31-item electronic survey was distributed to TOGA members between December 2023 and August 2024. Responses were analysed descriptively to assess access, usage patterns, perceived barriers, and clinician attitudes toward ctDNA testing.

Results: Thirty complete responses were analysed. Most respondents were medical oncologists working in metropolitan academic or public hospitals. While respondents estimated 83% of patients have access to molecular testing, only 12% were believed to have access to ctDNA testing. Only 33% reported routine ctDNA use, primarily in advanced disease settings. If more accessible, 83% indicated they would adopt ctDNA in advanced NSCLC. Key barriers to ctDNA utilization included cost (93%), logistical challenges (63%), limited knowledge (50%), and assay confidence (40%). Although over half of clinicians had patients inquire about ctDNA, fewer than 40% routinely discussed it. Most preferred are in-person or virtual workshops for education. Notably, 30% lacked access to a Molecular Tumor Board, and 70% did not provide pre-test counselling regarding incidental germline findings.

Conclusion: Despite limited current use, there is strong interest in ctDNA testing for NSCLC in ANZ. Addressing funding, logistical barriers, and clinician education is essential to enabling equitable, widespread adoption of ctDNA into standard lung cancer care.

澳大利亚循环肿瘤DNA利用的现状:一项对澳大利亚胸肿瘤学组成员的调查。
目的:评估澳大利亚胸肿瘤学会(TOGA)成员在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)利用的现状,并确定其在澳大利亚和新西兰(ANZ)临床实践中实施的障碍。方法:于2023年12月至2024年8月对TOGA会员进行31项电子问卷调查。对反应进行描述性分析,以评估获取、使用模式、感知障碍和临床医生对ctDNA检测的态度。结果:对30例完整应答进行分析。大多数受访者是在大都市学术医院或公立医院工作的内科肿瘤学家。虽然受访者估计83%的患者可以进行分子检测,但据信只有12%的患者可以进行ctDNA检测。只有33%的人报告了常规的ctDNA使用,主要是在晚期疾病环境中。如果更容易获得,83%的人表示他们将在晚期非小细胞肺癌中采用ctDNA。ctDNA利用的主要障碍包括成本(93%)、后勤挑战(63%)、知识有限(50%)和测定信心(40%)。尽管超过一半的临床医生让病人询问过ctDNA,但只有不到40%的人会定期讨论它。最受欢迎的是面对面或虚拟研讨会的教育。值得注意的是,30%的人没有进入分子肿瘤委员会,70%的人没有提供关于偶然生殖系发现的检测前咨询。结论:尽管目前使用有限,但对澳新银行NSCLC的ctDNA检测有浓厚的兴趣。解决资金、后勤障碍和临床医生教育问题对于公平、广泛地将ctDNA纳入标准肺癌治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信