Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Racial Disparities of HIV Retention in Care: A Statewide Cohort Analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fanghui Shi, Chen Zhang, Jiajia Zhang, Bankole Olatosi, Sharon Weissman, Xiaoming Li, Xueying Yang
{"title":"Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Racial Disparities of HIV Retention in Care: A Statewide Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Fanghui Shi, Chen Zhang, Jiajia Zhang, Bankole Olatosi, Sharon Weissman, Xiaoming Li, Xueying Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04813-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial disparities have historically existed regarding HIV care outcomes, including retention in care (RIC). However, data regarding the longitudinal patterns and predictors of such disparities among different racial groups and various geolocations are limited. This study aims to explore the contribution of contextual features (e.g., socioeconomic and structural environmental factors) to the changes in RIC outcome disparity at the county level. All adult people with HIV who received a HIV diagnosis in South Carolina (SC) between 2013 and 2020 were included in this study, and their de-identified CD4 counts and viral load information were derived from the SC statewide HIV registry system. All contextual factors were extracted from multiple publicly available datasets, such as the American Community Survey. To provide a comprehensive view, we used four indices to measure racial disparities in the county-level percentage of RIC, i.e., Black to White ratio (BWR), Index of Disparity (ID), Weighted Index of Disparity (Weighted ID), and Gini coefficient. Linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate the relationship between various contextual factors and these disparity indexes, except BWR. The temporal trend of the four indices suggested no significant increase or decrease in racial disparities in RIC across 46 counties in SC from 2013 to 2020. Counties with more primary care providers and higher social capital in collective efficacy showed lower racial disparities in RIC when ID and Gini coefficient were used as outcomes. For ID only, higher racial disparities in RIC were observed in counties with lower isolation index (β=-1.92, 95%CI: -3.31~-0.53). For weighted ID only, no county-level contextual features explored were significantly associated with racial disparities in RIC. Racial disparities in RIC persist without major changes in SC despite the national implementation of the \"Ending the HIV Epidemic\" initiative. Efforts to address racial disparities should continue; specifically, efforts that focus on social and structural factors should be developed and implemented for populations that have poor HIV outcomes in the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04813-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racial disparities have historically existed regarding HIV care outcomes, including retention in care (RIC). However, data regarding the longitudinal patterns and predictors of such disparities among different racial groups and various geolocations are limited. This study aims to explore the contribution of contextual features (e.g., socioeconomic and structural environmental factors) to the changes in RIC outcome disparity at the county level. All adult people with HIV who received a HIV diagnosis in South Carolina (SC) between 2013 and 2020 were included in this study, and their de-identified CD4 counts and viral load information were derived from the SC statewide HIV registry system. All contextual factors were extracted from multiple publicly available datasets, such as the American Community Survey. To provide a comprehensive view, we used four indices to measure racial disparities in the county-level percentage of RIC, i.e., Black to White ratio (BWR), Index of Disparity (ID), Weighted Index of Disparity (Weighted ID), and Gini coefficient. Linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate the relationship between various contextual factors and these disparity indexes, except BWR. The temporal trend of the four indices suggested no significant increase or decrease in racial disparities in RIC across 46 counties in SC from 2013 to 2020. Counties with more primary care providers and higher social capital in collective efficacy showed lower racial disparities in RIC when ID and Gini coefficient were used as outcomes. For ID only, higher racial disparities in RIC were observed in counties with lower isolation index (β=-1.92, 95%CI: -3.31~-0.53). For weighted ID only, no county-level contextual features explored were significantly associated with racial disparities in RIC. Racial disparities in RIC persist without major changes in SC despite the national implementation of the "Ending the HIV Epidemic" initiative. Efforts to address racial disparities should continue; specifically, efforts that focus on social and structural factors should be developed and implemented for populations that have poor HIV outcomes in the US.

艾滋病毒在护理中保留的纵向模式和种族差异的预测因素:一项全州范围的队列分析。
种族差异历来存在于艾滋病毒护理结果,包括保留护理(RIC)。然而,关于这种差异在不同种族群体和不同地区之间的纵向模式和预测因素的数据是有限的。本研究旨在探讨情境特征(如社会经济和结构环境因素)对县域RIC结果差异变化的贡献。2013年至2020年间在南卡罗来纳州(SC)接受HIV诊断的所有成年HIV感染者都被纳入本研究,他们的去识别CD4计数和病毒载量信息来自SC全州HIV登记系统。所有的背景因素都是从多个公开可用的数据集中提取出来的,比如美国社区调查。为了提供一个全面的观点,我们使用四个指标来衡量种族差异,即黑人与白人的比率(BWR)、差距指数(ID)、加权差距指数(加权ID)和基尼系数。采用线性混合效应模型估计除BWR外的其他因素与差异指数之间的关系。四项指标的时间趋势表明,2013 - 2020年南卡罗来纳州46个县的种族差异没有显著增加或减少。当使用ID和基尼系数作为结果时,具有更多初级保健提供者和更高集体效能社会资本的县在RIC上的种族差异较小。仅就ID而言,隔离指数较低的县(β=-1.92, 95%CI: -3.31~-0.53)的RIC种族差异较大。仅对于加权ID,没有县级上下文特征与RIC中的种族差异显著相关。尽管全国实施了“终止艾滋病毒流行”倡议,但非洲裔黑人的种族差异仍然存在,非洲裔黑人没有发生重大变化。应继续努力解决种族不平等问题;具体来说,应该针对美国艾滋病毒治疗效果不佳的人群制定和实施关注社会和结构因素的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信