Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/activation system scales in older adults in Mainland China: A classical test theory and item response theory approach.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105280
Peng Chen, Yanzhang Li, Mei Xiong, Yuping Zhang
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/activation system scales in older adults in Mainland China: A classical test theory and item response theory approach.","authors":"Peng Chen, Yanzhang Li, Mei Xiong, Yuping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study revises the Chinese version of the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scale for older adults in Mainland China, emphasizing cultural sensitivity. We assessed its reliability and validity using Classical Test and Item Response theories with data from 778 community-dwelling older adults. Item analysis confirmed adequate discriminative power for all items. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors with loadings ranging from 0.492 to 0.904, explaining 51.20 % of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor second-order model. Notable correlations were found: Self-Efficacy and Resilience negatively correlated with BIS but positively with BAS, while Depression correlated positively with BIS. The Attention to Positive Information Scale correlated solely with BAS. Discrimination indices for the BIS/BAS scale were acceptable, and difficulty parameters spanned a wide respondent range. The item information curve indicated optimal measurement for individuals with moderate ability. Overall, the revised BIS/BAS scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, with robust psychometric properties confirmed through both Classical Test and Item Response theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"258 ","pages":"105280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study revises the Chinese version of the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scale for older adults in Mainland China, emphasizing cultural sensitivity. We assessed its reliability and validity using Classical Test and Item Response theories with data from 778 community-dwelling older adults. Item analysis confirmed adequate discriminative power for all items. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors with loadings ranging from 0.492 to 0.904, explaining 51.20 % of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor second-order model. Notable correlations were found: Self-Efficacy and Resilience negatively correlated with BIS but positively with BAS, while Depression correlated positively with BIS. The Attention to Positive Information Scale correlated solely with BAS. Discrimination indices for the BIS/BAS scale were acceptable, and difficulty parameters spanned a wide respondent range. The item information curve indicated optimal measurement for individuals with moderate ability. Overall, the revised BIS/BAS scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, with robust psychometric properties confirmed through both Classical Test and Item Response theories.

中国大陆老年人行为抑制/激活系统量表的心理测量评估:一个经典测试理论和项目反应理论方法。
本研究修订了中国大陆老年人行为抑制系统/行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表的中文版,强调文化敏感性。我们使用经典测试和项目反应理论对778名社区老年人的数据进行了信度和效度评估。项目分析证实了所有项目都有足够的辨别力。探索性因子分析显示,4个因子的负荷范围为0.492 ~ 0.904,解释了51.20%的方差。验证性因子分析支持四因子二阶模型。自我效能、心理弹性与BIS呈显著负相关,与BAS呈显著正相关;抑郁与BIS呈显著正相关。积极信息注意量表仅与BAS相关。BIS/BAS量表的区分指数是可以接受的,难度参数跨越了广泛的被调查者范围。项目信息曲线显示中等能力个体的最优测量值。总体而言,修订后的BIS/BAS量表具有较强的信度和效度,并通过经典测试和项目反应理论证实了其强大的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信