Nurses' Perceptions and Recommendations on the Safe Use of "Copy and Paste" Function in an Electronic Medical Record of a National Tertiary Hospital.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.9685
Neil Roy B Rosales, Clemarl Salvador M Reyes, Marie May F Lugay
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions and Recommendations on the Safe Use of \"Copy and Paste\" Function in an Electronic Medical Record of a National Tertiary Hospital.","authors":"Neil Roy B Rosales, Clemarl Salvador M Reyes, Marie May F Lugay","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.9685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study at a national tertiary hospital in Manila, Philippines investigated the use of the \"Copy and Paste\" Function (CPF) within their Electronic Medical Record (EMR). While CPF has benefits and risks, little is known about its usage patterns and impact on patient safety at the institution. This study explores nurses' perceptions and recommendations on CPF use in this hospital's EMR, assessing its prevalence, impact on patient safety, associations between prevalence and impact, and providing usage recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential explanatory research design was employed using surveys and semi-structured interviews. Ethical clearance was obtained before data collection. Instruments were adapted from similar studies and have undergone expert validation. Content validity was confirmed, and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.77). Stratified random sampling determined the respondents per area. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman's rho, and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey (n = 256) showed CPF use by nurses and doctors, and was confirmed by semi-structured interviews (n = 9). Nurses generally perceived CPF's impact on documentation as neutral (40.17%), leaning towards positive impact. Interviews supported this, revealing both \"challenges\" and \"benefits\" of CPF use as themes after thematic analysis. There was no statistically significant association between perceived CPF prevalence and its perceived impact on patient safety (p = 0.164). The theme \"considerations for safe CPF use\" also emerged from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found mixed perceptions on CPF's impact in healthcare. There is a call to continue its use, but safety measures must be implemented first. Recommendations include order verification, caution, practice standardization, selective CPF usage, additional technological features, and alternative documentation methods. A governance structure to manage EMR-related issues, such as unsafe CPF practices, is also recommended to ensure proper monitoring and response.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 7","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.9685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study at a national tertiary hospital in Manila, Philippines investigated the use of the "Copy and Paste" Function (CPF) within their Electronic Medical Record (EMR). While CPF has benefits and risks, little is known about its usage patterns and impact on patient safety at the institution. This study explores nurses' perceptions and recommendations on CPF use in this hospital's EMR, assessing its prevalence, impact on patient safety, associations between prevalence and impact, and providing usage recommendations.

Methods: A sequential explanatory research design was employed using surveys and semi-structured interviews. Ethical clearance was obtained before data collection. Instruments were adapted from similar studies and have undergone expert validation. Content validity was confirmed, and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.77). Stratified random sampling determined the respondents per area. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman's rho, and thematic analysis.

Results: The survey (n = 256) showed CPF use by nurses and doctors, and was confirmed by semi-structured interviews (n = 9). Nurses generally perceived CPF's impact on documentation as neutral (40.17%), leaning towards positive impact. Interviews supported this, revealing both "challenges" and "benefits" of CPF use as themes after thematic analysis. There was no statistically significant association between perceived CPF prevalence and its perceived impact on patient safety (p = 0.164). The theme "considerations for safe CPF use" also emerged from the analysis.

Conclusion: This study found mixed perceptions on CPF's impact in healthcare. There is a call to continue its use, but safety measures must be implemented first. Recommendations include order verification, caution, practice standardization, selective CPF usage, additional technological features, and alternative documentation methods. A governance structure to manage EMR-related issues, such as unsafe CPF practices, is also recommended to ensure proper monitoring and response.

某三级医院护士对电子病历“复制粘贴”功能安全使用的认知与建议
背景和目的:本研究在菲律宾马尼拉的一家国立三级医院进行,调查了电子病历(EMR)中“复制和粘贴”功能(CPF)的使用情况。虽然CPF有好处也有风险,但人们对其使用模式和对该机构患者安全的影响知之甚少。本研究探讨护士对该医院电子病历中CPF使用的看法和建议,评估其流行程度、对患者安全的影响、流行程度与影响之间的关系,并提供使用建议。方法:采用序贯解释研究设计,采用问卷调查和半结构化访谈。数据收集前必须获得伦理许可。仪器改编自类似的研究,并经过专家验证。内容效度确认,内部一致性可接受(Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.77)。分层随机抽样确定每个地区的应答者。数据分析包括描述性统计、Spearman’s rho和专题分析。结果:调查结果(n = 256)显示护士和医生使用CPF,并通过半结构化访谈(n = 9)得到证实。护士普遍认为CPF对文件的影响为中性(40.17%),倾向于积极影响。访谈支持了这一点,在专题分析后揭示了CPF作为主题使用的“挑战”和“好处”。感知CPF患病率与其感知对患者安全的影响之间无统计学意义的关联(p = 0.164)。分析还提出了“安全使用CPF的考虑”这一主题。结论:本研究发现对CPF在医疗保健中的影响有不同的看法。有人呼吁继续使用它,但必须首先实施安全措施。建议包括订单验证、谨慎、实践标准化、选择性CPF使用、附加技术特性和替代文档方法。还建议使用治理结构来管理与电子病历相关的问题,例如不安全的CPF实践,以确保适当的监测和响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信