Seerwan Hamadameen Sulaiman, Hoshyar Saadi Ali, Rebaz Anwar Omer, Hemn A H Barzani, Musher Ismael Salih, Aryan Fathulla Qader
{"title":"Biochemical Insights into Oxidative Stress in Colon Cancer Patients.","authors":"Seerwan Hamadameen Sulaiman, Hoshyar Saadi Ali, Rebaz Anwar Omer, Hemn A H Barzani, Musher Ismael Salih, Aryan Fathulla Qader","doi":"10.1007/s12013-025-01827-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this research was to assess oxidative stress levels in colon cancer patients and examine their association with disease onset and progression. 176 individuals were recruited, comprising 106 colon cancer patients and 70 healthy controls. Serum oxidative stress marker levels of protein carbonyl (PCO), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and catalase (CAT) were quantified. The tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19.9) were also evaluated. The levels of PCO, IMA, MDA, and GST were significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each) with a significant decrease in GPX and SOD levels (P < 0.01) when compared to the control group. No significant difference was noted in CAT levels. The tumor markers CEA and CA 19.9 were significantly increased in the patient group (P < 0.01). These results suggest an imbalance of oxidative/antioxidant status in favor of oxidative stress in patients with colon cancer. The study identifies oxidative stress as a major factor in the pathogenesis of colon cancer. Clinically, biomarkers such as IMA with more than 80% sensitivity can be powerful secondary aids to early detection or monitoring disease progression. The findings suggest that modulating oxidative stress would be therapeutic in the treatment of colon cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":510,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-025-01827-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to assess oxidative stress levels in colon cancer patients and examine their association with disease onset and progression. 176 individuals were recruited, comprising 106 colon cancer patients and 70 healthy controls. Serum oxidative stress marker levels of protein carbonyl (PCO), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and catalase (CAT) were quantified. The tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19.9) were also evaluated. The levels of PCO, IMA, MDA, and GST were significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each) with a significant decrease in GPX and SOD levels (P < 0.01) when compared to the control group. No significant difference was noted in CAT levels. The tumor markers CEA and CA 19.9 were significantly increased in the patient group (P < 0.01). These results suggest an imbalance of oxidative/antioxidant status in favor of oxidative stress in patients with colon cancer. The study identifies oxidative stress as a major factor in the pathogenesis of colon cancer. Clinically, biomarkers such as IMA with more than 80% sensitivity can be powerful secondary aids to early detection or monitoring disease progression. The findings suggest that modulating oxidative stress would be therapeutic in the treatment of colon cancer.
期刊介绍:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (CBB) aims to publish papers on the nature of the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms underlying the structure, control and function of cellular systems
The reports should be within the framework of modern biochemistry and chemistry, biophysics and cell physiology, physics and engineering, molecular and structural biology. The relationship between molecular structure and function under investigation is emphasized.
Examples of subject areas that CBB publishes are:
· biochemical and biophysical aspects of cell structure and function;
· interactions of cells and their molecular/macromolecular constituents;
· innovative developments in genetic and biomolecular engineering;
· computer-based analysis of tissues, cells, cell networks, organelles, and molecular/macromolecular assemblies;
· photometric, spectroscopic, microscopic, mechanical, and electrical methodologies/techniques in analytical cytology, cytometry and innovative instrument design
For articles that focus on computational aspects, authors should be clear about which docking and molecular dynamics algorithms or software packages are being used as well as details on the system parameterization, simulations conditions etc. In addition, docking calculations (virtual screening, QSAR, etc.) should be validated either by experimental studies or one or more reliable theoretical cross-validation methods.