Catalyst Passivation and Coping Strategies in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

IF 7.5 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ChemSusChem Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1002/cssc.202500810
Xin Ao, Qiong Wu, Xingyu Liao, Wenjie Liu, Yuxuan Zhang, Xiaochen Lin, Fang Liu, Bingbing Tian
{"title":"Catalyst Passivation and Coping Strategies in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.","authors":"Xin Ao, Qiong Wu, Xingyu Liao, Wenjie Liu, Yuxuan Zhang, Xiaochen Lin, Fang Liu, Bingbing Tian","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202500810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lithium-Sulfur battery (LSB) is promising to be one of the next-generation energy storage systems due to its exceptionally high energy density. Various catalysts are designed into the cathode to enhance the conversion efficiency of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and improve the comprehensive performance of LSB. Despite considerable attention devoted to discovering novel catalysts, catalyst passivation remains a frequently overlooked issue. This review summarizes recent findings on catalyst passivation mechanisms and coping strategies in LSBs. It also clarifies a common misconception in LSB catalyst design: that stronger catalyst-polysulfide interactions necessarily improve catalytic performance. A stronger interaction between these two components does not necessarily indicate superior catalytic performance and may actually lead to catalyst passivation. The catalyst passivation mechanisms are categorized into two types, based on the strength of the interaction between the catalyst and sulfur/sulfides. The first type involves a strong interaction, leading to physical coverage-induced reversible catalyst passivation. The second type is characterized by an ultra-strong interaction, resulting in chemical reaction-induced irreversible catalyst passivation. The coping strategies to guide the design of optimal catalyst for the cathode of LSB is also summarized. Finally, the future prospects and challenges of catalyst coping strategies in LSB are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e2500810"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202500810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lithium-Sulfur battery (LSB) is promising to be one of the next-generation energy storage systems due to its exceptionally high energy density. Various catalysts are designed into the cathode to enhance the conversion efficiency of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and improve the comprehensive performance of LSB. Despite considerable attention devoted to discovering novel catalysts, catalyst passivation remains a frequently overlooked issue. This review summarizes recent findings on catalyst passivation mechanisms and coping strategies in LSBs. It also clarifies a common misconception in LSB catalyst design: that stronger catalyst-polysulfide interactions necessarily improve catalytic performance. A stronger interaction between these two components does not necessarily indicate superior catalytic performance and may actually lead to catalyst passivation. The catalyst passivation mechanisms are categorized into two types, based on the strength of the interaction between the catalyst and sulfur/sulfides. The first type involves a strong interaction, leading to physical coverage-induced reversible catalyst passivation. The second type is characterized by an ultra-strong interaction, resulting in chemical reaction-induced irreversible catalyst passivation. The coping strategies to guide the design of optimal catalyst for the cathode of LSB is also summarized. Finally, the future prospects and challenges of catalyst coping strategies in LSB are discussed.

锂硫电池催化剂钝化及应对策略。
锂硫电池(LSB)由于其超高的能量密度,有望成为下一代储能系统之一。为了提高多硫化锂(LiPSs)的转化效率,提高LSB的综合性能,在阴极中设计了多种催化剂。尽管大量的注意力投入到发现新的催化剂,催化剂钝化仍然是一个经常被忽视的问题。本文综述了近年来在催化剂钝化机制和应对策略方面的研究进展。它还澄清了LSB催化剂设计中的一个常见误解:更强的催化剂-多硫化物相互作用必然提高催化性能。这两种组分之间较强的相互作用并不一定表明优越的催化性能,实际上可能导致催化剂钝化。根据催化剂与硫/硫化物之间相互作用的强度,将催化剂钝化机制分为两种类型。第一种类型涉及强相互作用,导致物理覆盖诱导的可逆催化剂钝化。第二种类型的特点是超强相互作用,导致化学反应诱导不可逆催化剂钝化。总结了指导LSB阴极催化剂优化设计的应对策略。最后,对LSB催化剂应对策略的发展前景和面临的挑战进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ChemSusChem
ChemSusChem 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ChemSusChem Impact Factor (2016): 7.226 Scope: Interdisciplinary journal Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability Features the best research on sustainability and energy Areas Covered: Chemistry Materials Science Chemical Engineering Biotechnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信