Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences: An Exploration of Similarities, Differences, and Potential Explanations.

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Scott Devenport,Catriona Davis-McCabe,Barbara Mullan,Sam Winter
{"title":"Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences: An Exploration of Similarities, Differences, and Potential Explanations.","authors":"Scott Devenport,Catriona Davis-McCabe,Barbara Mullan,Sam Winter","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03173-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature studying individuals' selection of long-term romantic partners predominantly focuses on samples of majority gender and sexual identity (cisgender, heterosexual), leaving a gap in our knowledge regarding minority populations. In this study, 554 Australian adults seeking romantic partners (Mage = 32.06 years, 52.35% of whom reported minority gender and/or sexual identities) responded to an online survey regarding their partner selection experiences and beliefs, ideal and self-ratings on romantic partner traits, and self-perceived mate value. Factor analysis replicated established trait preference dimensions in this large, heterogeneous Australian sample, with dimensions remaining stable in majority and minority subsamples. Exploratory comparative and regression analyses generated preliminary insights into differences, similarities, interactions, and intersectional factors across identity groups. The commonly observed sex differences of men preferring aesthetic traits more than women, and women preferring empowered traits more than men were supported in comparative analyses. However, sex was not associated with preference for empowered traits in regression with identity, trait preferences, and self-perceived mate value. Self-perceived mate value findings replicated, challenged, and extended previous research, with asexual identity linked to lower self-perceptions. A preference for warm traits appeared to be a central factor through association with most other preferences and identities. As potential explanations, we discuss complex influences of evolutionary psychology, sociocultural factors, norms, and potential differences in partner selection processes. These findings contribute to our knowledge of partner selection experiences across majority and minority gender and sexual identity populations.","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03173-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature studying individuals' selection of long-term romantic partners predominantly focuses on samples of majority gender and sexual identity (cisgender, heterosexual), leaving a gap in our knowledge regarding minority populations. In this study, 554 Australian adults seeking romantic partners (Mage = 32.06 years, 52.35% of whom reported minority gender and/or sexual identities) responded to an online survey regarding their partner selection experiences and beliefs, ideal and self-ratings on romantic partner traits, and self-perceived mate value. Factor analysis replicated established trait preference dimensions in this large, heterogeneous Australian sample, with dimensions remaining stable in majority and minority subsamples. Exploratory comparative and regression analyses generated preliminary insights into differences, similarities, interactions, and intersectional factors across identity groups. The commonly observed sex differences of men preferring aesthetic traits more than women, and women preferring empowered traits more than men were supported in comparative analyses. However, sex was not associated with preference for empowered traits in regression with identity, trait preferences, and self-perceived mate value. Self-perceived mate value findings replicated, challenged, and extended previous research, with asexual identity linked to lower self-perceptions. A preference for warm traits appeared to be a central factor through association with most other preferences and identities. As potential explanations, we discuss complex influences of evolutionary psychology, sociocultural factors, norms, and potential differences in partner selection processes. These findings contribute to our knowledge of partner selection experiences across majority and minority gender and sexual identity populations.
在浪漫伴侣选择经验中的不同性别和性身份:相似性、差异和潜在解释的探索。
研究个人选择长期浪漫伴侣的文献主要集中在多数性别和性身份(顺性、异性恋)的样本上,这给我们对少数群体的了解留下了空白。在这项研究中,554名寻求浪漫伴侣的澳大利亚成年人(年龄32.06岁,52.35%的人报告少数性别和/或性身份)回答了一项关于他们选择伴侣的经历和信仰,对浪漫伴侣特征的理想和自我评价,以及自我感知的伴侣价值的在线调查。因子分析在这个庞大的、异质的澳大利亚样本中复制了已建立的性状偏好维度,在多数和少数子样本中维度保持稳定。探索性比较和回归分析对不同身份群体的差异、相似性、相互作用和交叉因素产生了初步的见解。男性比女性更喜欢审美特征,女性比男性更喜欢授权特征,这一普遍观察到的性别差异在比较分析中得到了支持。然而,在身份、特征偏好和自我感知的伴侣价值的回归中,性别与对授权特征的偏好没有关联。自我感知伴侣价值的发现重复、挑战并扩展了之前的研究,无性身份与较低的自我感知有关。通过与大多数其他偏好和身份的关联,对温暖特质的偏好似乎是一个核心因素。作为潜在的解释,我们讨论了进化心理学、社会文化因素、规范和伴侣选择过程中潜在差异的复杂影响。这些发现有助于我们了解多数和少数性别和性身份人群的伴侣选择经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信